Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
10 / 36 posts
Posts: 2230
0 votes RE: Is the banning of Prima...

I do not think it is admin/mod abuse, it's contractual. 

 What about my theoretical site creating contracts I spoke of?

The price would be too costly, many of us would not attend and would instead find a place where the price is not steep. 

As it stands, most of the users find primal not being here a small price to pay. 

 So it is more about your biases than the principle of the matter.

 Our principals are our biases.

 The way you all dragged Luna through the ringer over Jim is inconsistent with how people are reacting to the same situation with Primal. It seems like it never was about free speech but rather, free speech of popular users.

My grandiose delusions are better than yours.
Posts: 2857
0 votes RE: Is the banning of Prima...

If you didn't act insane, I wouldn't call you insane.

BO said:
I am part of a massive, wide-ranging, all encompassing, conspiracy. With possible ties to the democratic party, involving pedophiles, satanists, scammers, and all manner of sin and vice. Spearheaded by Sturm88 AKA Taylor Swift, the plot is to gather information on people on the internet and extract information, only to dump it all over the web and destroy their lives. Her operatives are some of the worst scum on earth, attacking and probing from all angles as part of a massive bullying and espionage operation with the intent to gather information on bystanders, and report the results of the operation to the DNC so they can learn more about how to harm conservatives, and this is passed to the corrupt CIA, and FBI to interrogate foreign entities. In turn they pay Taylor and she laughs all the way to the bank after getting paid for her favorite activity of sadism.

 Posted Image


Primal is banned because she uses websites to post blackmail information, among her insanity. Some of it may or may not help her cause.

If I host a website and she uses it to do this to my friend, then I have no decency and integrity. If Primal didn't try to sue, then it wouldn't matter. It is not some minor distress, I've not seen anyone cause this much 'distress' online to anyone else, in person, all my life. And I've seen people worse then the worst SC folk.

Primal is insane and she is ready to do anything in her madness and that makes her extra dangerous.

This is why all your talks of being morally superior are bullshit BO. You don't even understand.

 

There are no ifs and buts, because thats for school girls. I said something and now I will do it. Your childish tantrums do not change anything.
Its a matter of principle. Something you lack.


I have not banned anyone else, despite Edvard saying I will. So I wouldn't even ban you, BO.


If anyone is talking bullshit, its you, Primal and Edvard.

You use this as an escape goat for your own failures and you are insane.

Edvard is an asshole(stupid one too, you are smarter then him, too bad autism).

Primal is insane.

 

It doesn't matter how many stupid people will stand united, I only care for the opinions of those that I value.

Cheery bye!
last edit on 6/2/2019 7:30:29 AM
Posts: 2857
0 votes RE: Is the banning of Prima...

Also if Primal sues me, like she did Sturm: for 'bad website environment/the website allowing a hostile environment', that would effect the functionality of the site.

Considering how Sturm was her friend and I was too, I can't trust her at all. She snapped out of the blue, we hadn't even talked for quite a while.

Cheery bye!
Posts: 2266
0 votes RE: Is the banning of Prima...

We did not drag Luna through the ringer over Jim. 

His ban was decided upon and supported well before your arrival and that support along with the ban was carried out until Luna shut SC down. 

Attitudes toward Luna were derived from her own actions after being criticized.  

Posts: 2230
0 votes RE: Is the banning of Prima...
Good said: 

If you didn't act insane, I wouldn't call you insane.

BO said:
I am part of a massive, wide-ranging, all encompassing, conspiracy. With possible ties to the democratic party, involving pedophiles, satanists, scammers, and all manner of sin and vice. Spearheaded by Sturm88 AKA Taylor Swift, the plot is to gather information on people on the internet and extract information, only to dump it all over the web and destroy their lives. Her operatives are some of the worst scum on earth, attacking and probing from all angles as part of a massive bullying and espionage operation with the intent to gather information on bystanders, and report the results of the operation to the DNC so they can learn more about how to harm conservatives, and this is passed to the corrupt CIA, and FBI to interrogate foreign entities. In turn they pay Taylor and she laughs all the way to the bank after getting paid for her favorite activity of sadism.

 Posted Image


Primal is banned because she uses websites to post blackmail information, among her insanity. Some of it may or may not help her cause.

If I host a website and she uses it to do this to my friend, then I have no decency and integrity. If Primal didn't try to sue, then it wouldn't matter. It is not some minor distress, I've not seen anyone cause this much 'distress' online to anyone else, in person, all my life. And I've seen people worse then the worst SC folk.

Primal is insane and she is ready to do anything in her madness and that makes her extra dangerous.

This is why all your talks of being morally superior are bullshit BO. You don't even understand.

 

There are no ifs and buts, because thats for school girls. I said something and now I will do it. Your childish tantrums do not change anything.
Its a matter of principle. Something you lack.


I have no banned anyone else, despite Edvard saying I will. So I wouldn't even ban you, BO.


If anyone is talking bullshit, its you, Primal and Edvard.

You use this as an escape goat for your own failures and you are insane.

Edvard is an asshole(stupid one too, you are smarter then him, too bad autism).

Primal is insane.

 

It doesn't matter how many stupid people will stand united, I only care for the opinions of those that I value.

 My point is, I could make a site and have the prerequisite be to ban people who have hurt delora forever, and people would be up in arms about it. It's really about Primals popularity that you are not getting backlash. People are hypocrites. Jim is WAY nastier than Primal, and it is very possible that he is a kidnapper, and they FLIPPED out over his justified permabanning. This thread is becoming more about the flaws of others' perpsective than yours, TFI. 

I am exposing the favoritism and disregard for SC ideals upon the people who pounced on Luna for abandoning them.

My grandiose delusions are better than yours.
Posts: 2266
0 votes RE: Is the banning of Prima...
People are hypocrites. Jim is WAY nastier than Primal, and it is very possible that he is a kidnapper, and they FLIPPED out over his justified permabannin. ls upon the people who pounced on Luna for abandoning them.
 

 Once again, this is simply not true. 

Posts: 2230
0 votes RE: Is the banning of Prima...
People are hypocrites. Jim is WAY nastier than Primal, and it is very possible that he is a kidnapper, and they FLIPPED out over his justified permabannin. ls upon the people who pounced on Luna for abandoning them.
 

 Once again, this is simply not true. 

 There was a dedicated pool of users who opposed the Jim ban very openly. Maybe you are not one of them, but Xadem, TPG, and Scarlett for starters highly opposed Jim being banned.

My grandiose delusions are better than yours.
Posts: 2857
0 votes RE: Is the banning of Prima...

 My point is, I could make a site and have the prerequisite be to ban people who have hurt delora forever, and people would be up in arms about it. It's really about Primals popularity that you are not getting backlash. People are hypocrites. Jim is WAY nastier than Primal, and it is very possible that he is a kidnapper, and they FLIPPED out over his justified permabanning. This thread is becoming more about the flaws of others' perpsective than yours, TFI. 

I am exposing the favoritism and disregard for SC ideals upon the people who pounced on Luna for abandoning them.

OK.

Jim is nastier, but he has not been nastier while just being online, you have to consent and go to him yourself irl. And he has never lied about his persona, while Primal was our 'friend'.

 

I agree, if I wanted to perma ban TC or Alice, I don't think people would like it at all.

But thats how life works BO. People are not equal. Primal harasses nearly everyone and this is why she is banned from all other forums, despite her claims.

 

She picks some favorite people who she never attacks, like she picked me and it seems you, and delora. She seems to pick them depending on how naive they seem or if they seem like victims to her. I do not have another explanation. To her I've revealed a lot more of myself, so its possible this is how she sees it.

This might be off topic, but it can explain why people don't care so much about Primal. Her primary positive was that her harassment was just entertainment for most. And it explains why you don't understand why she is disliked and no one cares about her: you were special, as I am to her, so she never harassed you. 

 

I always thought its unenviable she will up her harassment game(since it comes from her delusions), me and Sturm had talks with her about it when we were friends, but she didn't budge. However no one expected her to betray us.

Cheery bye!
last edit on 6/2/2019 7:42:48 AM
Posts: 2230
0 votes RE: Is the banning of Prima...
Good said: 

 My point is, I could make a site and have the prerequisite be to ban people who have hurt delora forever, and people would be up in arms about it. It's really about Primals popularity that you are not getting backlash. People are hypocrites. Jim is WAY nastier than Primal, and it is very possible that he is a kidnapper, and they FLIPPED out over his justified permabanning. This thread is becoming more about the flaws of others' perpsective than yours, TFI. 

I am exposing the favoritism and disregard for SC ideals upon the people who pounced on Luna for abandoning them.

OK.

Jim is nastier, but he has not been nastier while just being online, you have to consent and go to him yourself irl. And he has never lied about his persona, while Primal was our 'friend'.

 

I agree, if I wanted to perma ban TC or Alice, I don't think people would like it at all.

But thats how life works BO. People are not equal. Primal harasses nearly everyone and this is why she is banned from all other forums, despite her claims.

 

She picks some favorite people who she never attacks, like she picked me and it seems you, and delora. She seems to pick them depending on how naive they seem or if they seem like victims to her. I do not have another explanation. To her I've revealed a lot more of myself, so its possible this is how she sees it.

But this might be off topic, but it can explain why people don't care so much about Primal. Her primary positive was that her harassment was just entertainment for most. And it explains why you don't understand why she is disliked and no one cares, you were special, as I am to her.

 

I always thought its unenviable she will up her harassment game(since it comes from her delusions), me and Sturm had talks with her about it when we were friends, but she didn't budge. However no one expect her to betray us.

 Well, where's the FULL story at, with every detail? I will read if you can take the time to type or link it.

My grandiose delusions are better than yours.
Posts: 2266
0 votes RE: Is the banning of Prima...
People are hypocrites. Jim is WAY nastier than Primal, and it is very possible that he is a kidnapper, and they FLIPPED out over his justified permabannin. ls upon the people who pounced on Luna for abandoning them.
 

 Once again, this is simply not true. 

 There was a dedicated pool of users who opposed the Jim ban very openly. Maybe you are not one of them, but Xadem, TPG, and Scarlett for starters highly opposed Jim being banned.

 As trolling from time to time, and this is not an example of 'dragging Luna through the ringer'.

All four of us along with tryp would speak to Jim when mods were asleep and once they arrived and banned him we'd laugh at him. The only time unbanning Jim was seriously discussed was by tryp two years after the fact because Jim was starting to have constructive dialogues with many of us, this was ultimately decided against in a peaceful manner. After this it is a fact that Inq was more lenient with Jim, which eventually lost him his modship. Not even this triggered us despite viewing him as a good mod, we openly joked about it and multiple satirical threads were made. Jim was really a none issue as it pertains to Luna. 

Luna was dragged through the ringer because she can neither take criticism nor a joke. 

10 / 36 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.