So would this make someone apathetic towards sex, would it make someone need larger fetishes to get their supply, or is it one before the other?
This explanation of yours goes on about their interests shifting, not so much the existence of the appetite itself.
Can you, as someone who admits to not reading posts in their entirety?
The topic was about apathy towards sex, and he answers instead about what they're into shifting from exposure, about them needing more to enjoy themselves. An appetite could still be quite strong with little to sate it within his explanation.
I once (eight or nine months ago?) said I sometimes don't read your posts in their entirety (because they are verbose, boring, creepy and often nonsensical, and to read and try to make sense of every word would be the equivalent of a part time job, and about as much fun as stacking shelves in asda).
I can't understand your not agreeing with the point Ed is making, but to actually not understand it (or pretend not to?) you must be terrifyingly dim.
Turncoat stated: source post
Wow you're lost. You ought to try reading posts more clearly before making a fool out of yourself.
Aw diddums. Do you get so upset when people challenge you irl? Or is your status here more important to you than rl?
Can you explain specifically which posts on this thread I haven't read clearly, what evidence you have to suggest this, and in what ways I am "lost" and "making a fool" of myself? I'm afraid you're being rather vague.
Edvard stated: source post
Well the answer was kinda there in my post. If you get to a point real sex/women can't satisfy you, ofc you lose interest in it.
But is that a loss of interest in sex, or in women? If the appetite is still there, I'd argue that the interest is still there, albeit unrealistic.
You end up choosing HamsterXXX over the real deal and you get to talk about how real sex "seems overrated".
Very... interesting kink you imagined there: