Sociopath Community

Primal stated: source post

 This site is 18+ and NSFW with only 1 rule: Do not ruin the usability of this site (such as spam, flooding, or illegal activities).

That's just a disclaimer put up so the site hosts don't get in trouble for what happens here. I am pretty sure that disclaimer followed shortly after one of the site members killed his grandfather and posted the pictures of that up on here. Legality is a concern here, which is why doxing is "take down upon request."

If this is truly a debate as your first post stated then treat it as one with the rules of a debate. Otherwise it is a childish argument.

That's why we need a neutral admin. Not the ones that only move their lazy fingers when it suits their own personal needs.

This guy is the kind of person that would let his friend post  "cheese pizza" all over here.

We have enough administration as it is and you're a noobfag, nobody agrees with you.

Enough people and at least the smart ones indeed agree. I am glad the sick ones did not took the same route as me, it means we are actually doing something right. Now go back to your porn, minion, be gone.

I've read through the thread and still don't really get it.

INTPG isn't going anywhere

I can't be fucked to read this thread entire thread. So forgive me if I have missed something.

There are probably pedophiles here.

There are almost certainly underage people here.

If you want someone to get banned because of their age, good luck. People claiming to be under 18 frequent this site, and nothing happens.

From what I skimmed, TC won't do anything unless he's "sure" they're underage. Meaning not only nothing will ever happen about people like TPG or FireMeetsIce, but also truthfully no one can be sure what their ages are. And so TC will not ban them, because, as he says, people can lie on the Internet, and we cannot be certain as to the validity of things. Now I think TC is bending technicalities a bit for his own entertainment. I mean, if you say you're 16, you're breaking the "one rule," seems a good reason for a ban. TC says we cannot know that is the case. I don't disagree with his actions, they have nothing to do with me. But that's what that is all about.

People come here of their own volition. To complain people are getting "taken advantage of" is kind of insane when you're on sociopath-community.com. You can lie and say you're an elder (FMI did that with a photo editor). How will you know how old someone is? Without concrete evidence, you don't know shit. Again, the "one rule" is for legal protection, and I've not seen one person care that (possibly) 16-year-olds signed up.

I agree with this. I'd consider taking action when 10-year-olds (ish) start frequenting this place but not before that.

I also think we should discourage children under 3 years old from smoking.