Who the fuck is Squishy of 3 posts. You have nothing to say.
How the fuck you come up with a child being drawn to pedophiles is pure bullshit.
Waltz, you aren't much different in your bullshit with the Pedo in question to begin with either. Your garbage is smeared equally between you two.
TPG is the victim here. And there is only ONE pedophile that is active here.
You're discrediting my argument based on my reputation: ad hominem. Furthermore instead of using fact you are using emotional language in an attempt to sensationalize your argument. This is a community of 18+ with a child attempting to engage sexually with adults. Any adults whom would participate would inherently be pedophiles. He is therefore drawn to pedophiles.
Your argument is bullshit as you are not a member, of anything beyond 3 posts and most likely you are JimSavage, who is known for shitting out puppets every other minute of the day.
Your thoughts are irrelevant in this discussion.
A child is NOT drawn to pedophiles. Prove such an occurrence by digging up studies that suggest such has ever been recorded as the case. Children can be groomed. However a child willfully seeking out sexual contact is an extreme rarity.
TPG may post in his defense.
Ok Primal, let's talk here by logic. I will drop the whole PEDO accusation.
Let's start from the basics. The only rules here are 18+ and no chat spamming.
Let's pretend he never spams, like all other members never spam. He still 15. The website is 18 since we will have convo that are not suitable for a boy that young.
How come you think the ban would be unfair, when in fact, it would just be a way to help his character developt ?
I can't imagine someone that young grow up reading all that crap we write here. I am pretty sure it won't make him a better person.
Edit: Don't take it personal, but it seems you are being selfish right now. You like his presence because you think it's fun. Have you stopped to think how bad this website is for him ?
You're clearly desperate to be correct and can't actually manage to debate my arguments with any validity. The person presenting an argument is irrelevant. Look up ad hominem. Everything you used to discredit me was a fallacy and inherently false. Regardless of whether he was groomed or not he is seeking out sexual contact with adults and you are endorsing that by allowing him to continue.
Waltz Inaminor stated: source post
Let's pretend he never spams, like all other members never spam. He still 15. The website is 18 since we will have convo that are not suitable for a boy that young.
That 18+ nonsense is just a way for Luna to escape liability, seeing as we can't really prove their age without a dox. She wanted it to be like one of those "Click here if you're 18" buttons... without the button.
Luna started here at age 16, and look how well she's doing now.
How come you think the ban would be unfair, when in fact, it would just be a way to help his character developt ?
Character development from sheltering him? That seems more like it'd give room for regression.
I can't imagine someone that young grow up reading all that crap we write here. I am pretty sure it won't make him a better person.
As one of those kids who was allowed to watch Rated R movies when I was little, I'd say there's a fair amount of room for growth. I browsed weird places when I was growing up and out of it I became more informed instead of more damaged. Exposure can be healthy if the person is able to handle what they see.
What is "a better person" to you?
Edit: Don't take it personal, but it seems you are being selfish right now. You like his presence because you think it's fun. Have you stopped to think how bad this website is for him ?
I dunno, forums are what ramped up my typing speed and made me become better at writing papers. It's also a decent place to learn about what people are capable of without (necessarily) bridging the gap.