Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
Posts: 170
SC Wedding

Sugar stated: source post

"There are 2 or 3 that I could maim remorselessly and without any provocation besides what they've said to me this past year on SC."

not sure if this is directed toward me as one of the 2 or 3, but if you maimed me i would murder both your children.

1.

"not sure if this is directed toward me as one of the 2 or 3,"

Sounds like:"I am uncertain if I am one of the 2 or 3 that you would maim unprovoked but if I am, this is what I would do in retaliation to you(xena) maiming me:"

2.

 "if you maimed me i would murder both your children."

If

Only after you cause her harm would she follow up with what she said.

Only after Xena maims Sugar, Sugar would do what she said.

Now, because xena hasnt maimed Sugar, Sugar will not murder Xenas children.

Best thing to do?

Don't go meeting people armed to hurt them and then try to claim self defense if it's premeditated. That's not how it works.

Posts: 3246
SC Wedding

I'm glad we covered this.

Posts: 3645
SC Wedding

lol

Self defense is self defense, asshole.

If we were to meet in a "stand your ground" state, the law would allow me to shoot the stupid bitch. Forget about just beating her.

 

The fact remains. If I'm invited to a wedding, I'm not going to pussy out bc some idiot has been making threats on the internet at me.

I'm going to make sure I'm able to protect myself if said asshole carries through on those threats.

IF.

 

And that's not the point.

The point is the stupid cunt just irrepairably underminedd 5 months of fake concerntroll concern statements that she's made about my kids.

She threatened to murder them.

Therefore she just proved my point for me.

Posts: 476
SC Wedding

Another good thread ruined by some petty insignificant bickering nobody but the involved parties give a damn about.

smh tbh fams

Posts: 3645
SC Wedding

"Don't go meeting people armed to hurt them and then try to claim self defense if it's premeditated. That's not how it works."

 

So the law says people are allowed to murder innocent children IF blah blah?

lol. You're only pretending to be this stupid, right?

Posts: 10218
SC Wedding

Damien stated: source post

Another good thread ruined by some petty insignificant bickering nobody but the involved parties give a damn about.

smh tbh fams

It was essentially just another "What would happen if we were all in the same room?" thread anyway. It's not much of a loss and I'm sure that we'll see plenty more of them. 

Posts: 10218
SC Wedding

If you maim her, then she'll retaliate on your kids.

Technically you'd need to premeditate the maiming, if not admit to poor self control if you're assuming that you'll end up hitting first inevitably. Your kids by those conditions aren't in any danger. 

That is... unless you're seriously trying to paint Sugar as some sort of wanton child beater. 

Posts: 1201
SC Wedding

oh no..if only you were here to dull us all to death ;)

Posts: 1201
SC Wedding

"The fact remains. If I'm invited to a wedding, I'm not going to pussy out bc some idiot has been making threats on the internet at me."

me neither. anyway, just so we're clear, was i included in the 2 or 3? if not, you have nothing to fear from me

Posts: 2829
SC Wedding

This is the silliest thing I've seen here yet. How many people have made a comment on this forum or in chat and didn't think twice about it? Does it really need to be said that you shouldn't believe everything/anything you read online? 

 

If you really feared someone from here then you wouldn't be here. Ever. But since you are and say, sugar did kill your kids. Are you now a willing accessory for continually being here and giving out information? This is nothing but an attempt to paint those you dislike in a bad light. It's backfiring. 

This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.