Xena stated: source post
^ Comments like that are the biggest reason I doubt your self proclaimed legal expertise.
There's no such thing as taking a night class for welfare entitlement in Canada or the US.
And I'm not on welfare.
For the 8000th time.
Xena stated: source post
srsly?
No autism is not an STD, you tard.
Why do you even bother Xena with Sugar's trolling, Xena. You're just getting frustrated while playing into her boredom.
lolwut?
Now you sound like wooster. I'm not frustrated.
I'm fascinated, actually.
I'm kinda curious about how many times one idiot can repeat the same 5 incorrect sentences in front of an audience, all of whom know she's completely full of shit, completely unfunny, and completely not anything else she's tryina be.
I wanna go for broke with this thing. I wanna see how long it will take before people get so bored with sugar's echolalia that they leave the forum.
]:D
Boring. You know I'm not autistic.
And I was correcting your incorrect explanation of the thin skull principle for our audience, who may or may not be aware of it. I was hoping you were joking. Your incorrect use of the term was actually quite funny, whether you meant it to be or not.
But it looks like my corrections are compelling you to reach into your bag of impotent oneliners again.
Way to bore our audience some more
shrugs
Pfft.
You mean your failtroll?
Yeah, I get it. I just refuse to respond to it bc it's so idiotic.
"so how did i incorrectly explain the thin skull principle mm? was it the part where i said i would try to apply it to me doing whatever to those close to you even though it's never been used in that context? hmm?"
Precisely.
Xena stated: source post
"i am not aware of this principle being applied in cases where the victim has in retaliation harmed those close to the perpetrator, but i would be happy to argue for this concept to be used in a new context, for the purpose of deterring others from such deranged, remorseless attacks."
^ This is hilarious.
The precedents set in this particular area of torte law (on wiki) were all cases of driver negligence (vehicular manslaughter) or attacks involving perps of equal or superior size and strength attacking a smaller and weaker victim. The one boy required a leg amputation and the other died.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eggshell_skull
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vosburg_v._Putney
Are you tryina tell me that you would even waste your time arguing that my maiming somebody (who you previously believed was you, so we'll call her you for the sake of our thought experiment) who is predisposed to homicidal fits of rage bc of her PD...
would make MOI responsible for her killing my children?
You would srsly try to convince a judge that I should pay you for your brittle batshit skull if you were to opt to cross at least one international border to murder my kids in retalliation for being assaulted?
lol. Just lol.
The part where you try to convince a judge that your brittle skull that was somehow(?) made weaker by smthg I did...
that said brittle skull made it across at least one international border and into 2 separate residences, several hundred miles apart, both with addresses you'd have to do some crazy amounts of tapdancing to find...
And then use the same brittle noggin to commit 2 separate acts of premeditated murder... lol
That might get you a lifelong stay in a looneybin rather than prison.
I thought you were intentionally trying to be funny with that.
sowwy XD
Do you actually think that's what I actually think?
lol tard.
"
who is predisposed to homicidal fits of rage bc of her PD...
would make MOI responsible for her killing my children?
You would srsly try to convince a judge that I should pay you for your brittle batshit skull if you were to opt to cross at least one international border to murder my kids in retalliation for being assaulted?"
^ Notice all the places where I used "brittle batshit skull" as euphemisms for SUGAR IS A HOMICIDAL MANIAC CHILD KILLER