MissB, Europe is a continent - a geographical entity composed of various individual societies. The EU is a lurid fallacy. The former is currently in the process of getting rid of the latter, before the harm imposed becomes irreversible.
Norway is basically unofficially part of Europe. They act like part of Europe.
Though the Kingdom of Norway is not a member state of the European Union, it is closely associated with the Union through its membership in the European Economic Area in the context of being a European Free Trade Association member.
Norway's trade is dominated by the EU, and Norway is the EU's 5th most important import partner. Norway to EU trade amounted to 91.85 € billion in 2008, primarily energy supplies (only 14.1% is manufactured products). The EU's exports to Norway amounted to 43.58 € billion, primarily manufactured products.
Norway has been granted participation rights (save voting rights) in several of the Union's programs, bodies and initiatives. These include security and defense areas like the European Defense Agency, the Nordic Battle Group, Frontex Europoland the European Monitoring Center for Drigs and Drug Addiction. Whether or not the country should apply for full membership has been one of the most dominant and divisive issues in modern Norwegian political debate.
So that's why jimmy thinks I'll fuck him for a sandwich.
What a dick lol
Hey jimmy! This is a minimum wage job in Canada you tard.
Minimum wage is $11.25/ hour (roughly the cost of 2 hearty sandwiches, no sex required.)
And lots of us get our sandwiches for free :P
See how nice our hockey players are? <3
Not over till the fat lady sings by friday.
Still have half a box of Leave leaflets (leavelets?) to spread, pray it won't rain tomorrow. As a bona fide schizoid the least thing i had on my mind was approaching strangers on the street, still baffled by how easy it is. Pleasant, even.
Inquirer stated: source post
How is the migrant sex trade compared to the eastern European sex trade, for example? Does it dwarf it?
By a far shot, yes. By a very far shot.
Inq., sorry for being sparse (time / effort limits), you strike me as somewhat agenda-free and as perhaps genuinely curious. Might post links (stats, figures) if i get around it.
Meanwhile, i recommend you check out ex-muslim / apostate communities on fb & whereever. They are firsthand source.
Myself, i regard people by their individual merit, and that alone. However, the issue at hand is a global trend though, regardless the outliers. Koranic literalism has its ebbs end flows - and so commands the appropriate response. The core problem lies with the current 'western' administration's response.
Land grab....agree with you on that one Moonshine! ..lol...
Tryp wrote:
But you can at least acknowledge it is happening, right? I mean I can dig more and try to find things I've seen before, but I loathe doing that when it seems like common sense. Look at what happened on New Years in Germany. Consider the mindset behind it.
Please do Trypt. If you have more, it would be useful as evidence. It's not like you or I are making this up. The reality of it is worse than many are willing to realize. Cognitive dissonance on a national scale is what paralyzes nations it seems. The inability to comprehend such a different mindset allows for relatively easy blinding of the public. As the public are part and parcel of their own blinding through the use of PC rhetoric. "Islamaphobe', Racist, Bigot, you name it, those are labels used to shut people down. When in fact, none of those labels are even close to being accurate. It is the mindset of a particular group that is most often easily recognized by the skin color which muddies the facts and makes it easy to gaslight the public. That 'gaslighting' is carried out in broad daylight by making it 'illegal' to state the ethnicity of perpetrators and in that manner, obfuscate the facts.
@Inquirer
Warnings were probably given to women but I don't think they came from the government/municipality etc.
Those warning should have been the other way around. Touch Swedish women or men against their express wishes and be dragged around the country side by a rope. The immigrants are guests in the country. They have no 'rights' to be there other than those that were granted to them on compassionate basis.
@ Tryp
I feel baffled I have that logic alone isn't sufficient here, but I can understand the need for evidence.
I know, me too. It seems pretty obvious to me that there is a massive problem. However, some people will not recognize it exists until it directly affects them on a personal level.
Inky, imagine you are minding your own business walking down the street. Then a gang of ( any race/ group. for sake of current argument recent immigrants to Sweden) attacks you, beaten and dragged into an alley. Pinned down while you struggle and scream, the assailants are laughing at you while they tear off your clothes and then sitting on your limbs they anally rape you, taking their turns and videotaping their amusement. And then later, you are blamed for getting raped because you were merely walking down the street you have walked 10000 times before in complete safety.
I cannot imagine that anyone will be 'ok' with that happening to them. The data on that sort of crime perpetrated against anyone is pretty dismal.
Inquirer
I agree Europe has a problem and it's quite big. Especially the failure to stand up for core western values (free speech, tolerance etc.) is worrying to me.
It is a big problem. It is growing and it will continue to grow larger. Exponentially by the looks of it. The numbers are not lying about that. Minority of a minority is responsible for 6.7% increase on a national level in Germany alone, and that minority of a minority did NOT include the recent arrivals. That is in Fact massive. Which is also why the media has been quietly silenced. The numbers are there, but the PC rhetoric is blinding people to that. They don't even have to be silenced, people shout each other down using the PC slogans, and will basically bring it on themselves.
The EU is trying to "guilt' Poland into taking "refugees' which even the Saudi, Yemeni etc have Rejected based on fears of 'terrorists' amongst them. Which is funny, as that would be muslims slaughtering each other, and a muslim understands another muslim better than anyone else. Instead, Saudi offers to build 200 Mosques on Euro soil? What kind of a joke is that? Poland accepted a $12.1 billion dollar bail out, which is what the EU is holding over their head, but that bailout package came long before the immigration crisis was ever on the scene. Now the EU is attaching strings to that and Germany is shifting its self created problem to the rest of Europe. Norway recently rejected 80000 claimants of refugee status. Where do they go now? 3 million more are set to enter. Europe....what then? There are less than, ~ approx 1.5 million or less even, that have managed to create a whole ton of very strange things happening in Europe. From Pork in restaurants to rape of little children in the streets....it is insane. That is not the European News I am /was used to reading about.
Before the discussion gets lost in the economics of the macro , let's focus on the micro, the person to person experience in the streets of too many places. Children being raped by readily identifiable members of their society. How is it that the hosts of these immigrants are feeling 'guilty' or in any manner responsible for the rape of their friends/ family children , if not in some fashion they actually might be? And they are guilty, when they continue to hang on to the senseless concept of 'tolerance' as it is being promoted. Which "side" needs to change in this scenario? Europe adapt to Islam, or Islam adapt to Western Europe?....I think it is pretty obvious which side is being FORCED to "adapt' and it is not a pretty sight.
On the note of obfuscation, the BBC's initial article, "a problem with some overhead power supply":
https://web.archive.org/web/20160620160955/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-36578348 < news item vanished, erased, deleted (but thankfully archived) as soon as real life coverage surfaced. What in fact was going on: http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/681614/Calais-migrants-refugees-Britain-UK-EU-referendum-Brexit-Euro-2016
They still haven't learnt a fucking clue from Cologne. Facts do surface, no matter how much they criminalise the messenger.
Of course as of today it's a sensitive matter of Cox / Calais balance.
moonshine stated: source post
On the note of obfuscation, the BBC's initial article, "a problem with some overhead power supply":
https://web.archive.org/web/20160620160955/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-36578348 < news item vanished, erased, deleted (but thankfully archived) as soon as real life coverage surfaced. What in fact was going on: http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/681614/Calais-migrants-refugees-Britain-UK-EU-referendum-Brexit-Euro-2016
They still haven't learnt a fucking clue from Cologne. Facts do surface, no matter how much they criminalise the messenger.
Of course as of today it's a sensitive matter of Cox / Calais balance.
This reminds me when some immigrants were trying to smuggle themselves in France, i think, and Bulgarian truck drivers sweared at them
Apparently they BRUTALLY sweared at them, thats how our news reported it. Brutally lol.
Here is the video, but its in Bulgarian:
https://www.facebook.com/NBM.Transport/videos/404448029758438/
Starts at about 1 minute