Xena stated: source post
Um... no.
I'm riffing on smthg MissB said in chat :P
so why respond to crick's post and not state what your comment was in reference to?
I know what a sig is. We had them on PF too.
They were used a little differently, but the idea is similar enough.
crazy eyes
Daniella stated: source post
why not correct the misunderstanding? if you really cared about the misunderstanding and not making her look stupid you would have just fucking explained it
lol who the fuck said he cared? did he ever even imply it? and why should he babysit this middle aged buffoon ahaha. rather than 'not making her look stupid' you wanted him to jump in and save her from looking stupid, which would be misleading and unfair. she is stupid.
Daniella stated: source post
why not correct the misunderstanding? if you really cared about the misunderstanding and not making her look stupid you would have just fucking explained it
There's an example provided. I think she might just not be interested in the thread.
Daniella stated: source post
why not correct the misunderstanding? if you really cared about the misunderstanding and not making her look stupid you would have just fucking explained it
Xena doesn't need anyone's help to look stupid.
Sugar stated: source post
which one is the thread you were prepared to tell us to gtfo of if we derailed by attacking xena? was it this one? cos i feel like misbehaving crick ;)
This is not it. I offered to provide a psych eval thread and try to keep it on topic if agreed to. It has not been.