Sugar stated: source post
Cricket stated: source post
At this point in the thread, I'm just being used as bait and fodder with the untrustworthiness rating as a point of contention to perpetuate drama. Carry on, lovelies.
outstanding.
Isn't it? And it just keeps going too. lol
Turncoat stated: source post
She's inquiring about Ed's motives, not yours.
Anal wasn't bringing up the untrustworthiness thread in her statements, which is what Ed mentioned. She was discussing the emotions thread, which I threw in just out of curiosity.
Cricket stated: source post
At this point in the thread, I'm just being used as bait and fodder with the untrustworthiness rating as a point of contention to perpetuate drama. Carry on, lovelies.
outstanding.
It could be she did not notice it before it was brought to attention. It could be that she is realizing it might influence someone who does not know her to have a statement even without an explanation. I know without an explanation it is hard for me to take it into account.
I think she sees it is raising suspicious and she is not even sure why crow would have these feelings. I think crow knows it is raising suspicions on cricket... I am not sure she considered it could raise suspicions on her without explaining it to cricket. It is all kinda suspicious.
I want to send a reminder... I feel like a judgment without explanation is a bit empty. I don't think crow needs people to be on board with her opinion. I do wonder if she knows she is raising suspicions for both of them.
