Sociopath Community

Calm down Turn, my post wasn't as hostile or invalidating as you must have perceived it. It wasn't about me either, despite your own attempts to discredit my points by pushing this narc image onto me.

Again: This is not to invalidate your opinions inside or outside "SC battles". It's fine you two have similar opinions. It's fine that all disagreements are probably discussed in private since sure as hell I don't see them on the forum. You two are distinct people and both of you have all the right to say whatever you want. I merely explained why you two give the impression of ganging up. You are more motivated to agree loudly with one another, as opposed to say person X and some random guy who agrees with person X but is not personally motivated enough to participate. Your two voices make up into one loud one that catches attention. Ofc people switch and group differently in various arguments, but no 2 people find themselves on the same side of an argument, actively, as often as you two. If you disagree, tell us who. If you think you've been involved into "plenty of disagreements with others" without the other joining, give some examples.

Even now, the main issue you seem to have with me is related to me picking on Crow. I think this alone is telling. Even if I was picking on her (I'm cool with her, btw), you felt compelled to defend her in a way I haven't seen you do with other people here who get/have got picked on (and fuck, they've been plenty).

It's aggravating that you keep trying to lump us into one person, and it is all about you. There's plenty of others on here you could argue that I haven't disagreed with, but that isn't the current convenience. The narc image is real, as this is what you do. You aren't "picking on" her either, you're butting heads, and every time that it goes on my credibility goes down a peg if I feel like participating from you trying to sell this bullshit time and time again with the same applying towards her should it be shoe on the other foot, or even when we don't stand in for the other from you bringing up how unexpected that that is. It invalidates that I'd have an opinion like this of you despite the sheer number of things that it took to have it build into this. I'm tired of it, my patience is worn down from it, I'm done having this be your way of excusing what's going on. 

Crow is barely even online these days and I oppose people quite a lot. It shouldn't be that hard to find a case where we aren't in tandem honestly. Stop making it about "us" and see that we're doing what we're doing separately, as otherwise you are completely blinding yourself to the bigger picture. This is ridiculous, it shouldn't only be taken seriously when we're disagreeing with each other merely from the fact that we're a couple. You want me to be siding with you against her for a change? Make a good enough argument that I can agree with and I will, just how I've backed down when I've recognized my being mistaken over things in the past. As is, you lately have been nothing but easy to disagree with points. 

I want to mention that I think it is only natural for couples or those in close bonds to favor and defend one another. I know that individuals we are close and share connections with are considered trustworthy in our own eyes. It mans if they have an opinion it is likely to swayed us because we have a certain level of confidence in them. It is important to mention there is a sort of unification in close bonds. In this case it should be expected and only natural for couples to tend to back each other on most occasions. It is like the members of the relationship become an "US".

In high school my best friend hated a girl I just met. I kind of liked the girl because she was dope. In time I began to resent her and not even on purpose. I heard my friend go on and on about how much she hates the girl. I know it was all bias and she had nothing substantial against this girl. I did not try to grow in resentment for the girl. I even tried to fight my own resentment because I knew it was not the proper way to judge. I became conflicted within myself when I was around the girl. I was never mean to her because I have self control. I just had a hard time stopping the  opinions my friend was sharing with me. 

I did make a thread about maximum killing distance. It states that the more social and physical distance is between the two individuals the easier it is to murder the individual. I should mention this has nothing to do with murder. I just want to remind everyone that there is favoritism for those we consider close and disregard for those considered outside our circle of relationships. It is natural and does not seem right to the new individual who is almost considered an outsider in a way. 

I do not think it is wrong to favor those in close bonds and want to defend them. I do think it is easy to fall for their opinions because of the level of trust we put in those who are close to our heart. It just means we should expect people who share bonds to often agree and defend one another. I say it is not bad because it is almost a survival tactic to trust those who have proven to be pretty trustworthy. I think this is actually kind of beautiful. In the end all it means is that they trust each other and are unified. 

If you want to get around this... I just suggest you try ensuring you are no stranger. I recommend trying to bond with both of the parties. I have a song to describe what I mean... 

FEMALE SINGER

MALE SINGER 

SCREAMO ISH (MY PREFERRED) 

you mean inherit the beloved admin position ;^)

Do they just want to get in my pants? 

maybe~

oooh you should throw shade more often. it's tainted by autism right now, but practice makes perfect. :P

We're both critical people who love to argue, but we tend to accomplish more that way with actual talking. For the areas we're in agreeance over, I mean come on, we ended up dating somehow, go figure that we'd have some common ground. I wouldn't really say she defends constantly either, she actually spends much more time typing about things that don't have to do with me. She has an identity outside of me, you know, opinions that are there because they're her own and not an extension of mine.

Finding excuses for why someone might agree or defend me only serves to undermine their own opinion, and at that point, what of those who agree/defend me who aren't dating me? Do they just want to get in my pants? 

Astamiss stated: source post

There's a free ebook on amazon. It might provide insight.

http://imgur.com/D3SLNz4

 

Edit: Damn one site classifies it under dark romance and erotica.

 

Good read.  Thank you to suggest it. Hopefully some others will read it as well. Figured out who the two rats were early on, but not the driver of the double cross.  That was brutal, but also made sense from that perspective. 

Have only read Crow and TC nothing via PM. But over the years, they both are quite interesting. Most of the time TC makes complete sense, until he goes too far down the existential path, at which point it becomes discussions of potentials and unknowns, and pointless IMO. Albeit , it can have a point, when you consider it as part of the internal make up/ mind map of a person. At what point though, is it mental illness speaking vs belief? 

Ed's 'fighting' style,  is planting 'seeds of doubt. ' Then he comes along to water his crop, while pretending to pull the weeds and evade questions while asking them. Then, no matter what you state he will spin it and come at you with a some side swipe personal attack to shift the direction of the substanceless-ness of his argument. All the while congratulating himself at what he perceives to be your expense. 

Ok Turn. Shh. It's ok. Your credibility is fine. I will stop now for you, alright?

Lol spot on.