Stop using $100 words to ruin my thread and confuse me. :P
Like most things, the definition has multiple meanings and contexts in which it is applied. Take for example the economic models or weather models which are premiered by chaos theory and "chaos". While the mechanics and physics behind and governing these interactions is very accurate the complexity and dynamics of the system creates the chaos in that case (which follows what you said). However there's the inherent chaos in a dynamic system and numerical instability of it to take into account to, which by itself fosters chaos even with these variables accounted for. Furthermore there are inherently non-deterministic types of chaos and quantum chaos which all by their own right prove the existence of inherent chaos. But hey it's voodoo right?
I don't really know beyond a feeling of self control. When I am less all over the place I kind of hit a dead end. Trying to figure things out used to be so much of it, so having more answers for it alongside my original plans for the future not coming to pass as expected has left me somewhat directionless.
I cling to others who have direction instead of finding my own, trying to help them hone in on what they want in an advisory sense so that I can go with them. I make up for my lacking in a symbiotic fashion, as alone I am nothing, a tool with no one to use me.
Cadaver stated: source post
Like most things, the definition has multiple meanings and contexts in which it is applied.
Took you long enough. XD
So I guess you see yourself as a wingman? This is pretty honest and insightful but maybe a bit of a copout so you don't have to take any responsibility. You want a feeling of control but you give your control away? I fear you lose yourself in the goals of others without ever knowing what you want for yourself alone.
Turncoats is even the more common and older definition.
Plain wrong, like I said only the webster's definition supported a disconnect between governing power and outcome, which they later corrected. Furthermore the context of the word is important, if it is used when discussing physics and governing laws assuming someone is using the most common or the contextually appropriate definition shouldn't be too much to ask for. But hey you people just seem to keep on impressing me with your stupidity and unwavering will in preserving the little "intellectual bubble" you have. It's time for some facts and for kids to stop pretending that they have even the slightest clue about how these things work.
Do you have a reading impediment or are you just hell bent on embarrassing yourself when called on by TC for some ego-aid?
It was superfluous, self-serving, vulnerable and depressing. It hung there like a piece of rotten fruit. I appreciate your appreciation, but meh... The very barriers it referred to were the ones that were circumvented, then came back.
...Also, in light of the weird conflict going on here at present, it was distracting. :)
