Ya I picked up on this rule after palling around here for a few days it's legit but they really need this 'unspoken rule' publicised or at least don't ban my homeboys if they haven't been warned and are breaking it out of ignorance that is crossing the line into hotpocketry.
TurnCoat I love you and all but what can I say y'all cowards don't even post dox.
Buttered Toast stated: source post
Do we have a working (i.e. agreed upon) definition of "spam?" There's your grey area.
While I do agree that we need an agreed upon definition of spam, this is has nothing to do with spam since the member who got chat banned was just posting a couple of comments in chat and wasn't even remotely spamming.
juicy bits stated: source post
turn would have let up any other dox
he's just sucking michael's dick now by deleting luna's dox
too pussy to upset michael
All the people he's taken down doxxes for during his tenure here, might beg to differ. And if he were too pussy to upset management..... how exactly did all of this unfold in the first place? XD
itstimeforpie stated: source post
So you dox Luna on KF, but protect her from that very same information being exposed here. Good to know, you treacherous fuck.
. . . You're site has different rules than ours. Silly fuck.
Reaper stated: source post
I completely agree with this. Turncoat is only supposed to deal with spammers, not ban people from chat when they're not even spamming.
And Luna has to request her dox be taken down, just like the rest of us.
Turncoat, you're just the toilet cleaner, remember. So, do you're fucking job properly.
Luna did request it, oblivious landwhale. : P
As for chat, I wasn't there so I can't speak as to what happened. But considering that much of this started because Turncoat refused to support Luna in the unjust ban of Kiwi members who hadn't broken any rules, somehow I doubt he's now doing the same. XD
TheCrowOnTheFence stated: source post
All the people he's taken down doxxes for during his tenure here, might beg to differ.
Who has he taken down doxxes for?
There's only been one that I'm aware of (Pink's dox) and look how he played with her before taking that one down, purposefully delaying the process.
Reaper stated: source post
I completely agree with this. Turncoat is only supposed to deal with spammers, not ban people from chat when they're not even spamming.
And Luna has to request her dox be taken down, just like the rest of us.
Turncoat, you're just the toilet cleaner, remember. So, do you're fucking job properly.
Luna did request it, oblivious landwhale. : P
Oblivious landwhale, huh. This is not preschool. Grow up.
How do you know Luna requested it? Nobody else saw the request.
As for chat, I wasn't there so I can't speak as to what happened. But considering that much of this started because Turncoat refused to support Luna in the unjust ban of Kiwi members who hadn't broken any rules, somehow I doubt he's now doing the same. XD
You weren't in chat when (I can't remember their username now) got chat banned for no legitimate reason. I was and I saw it.
Turncoat did exactly the same thing Luna was doing. He can't just chat ban people who didn't spam.
If turncoat can't do his job properly, he shouldn't be a mod here.
I completely agree with this. Turncoat is only supposed to deal with spammers, not ban people from chat when they're not even spamming.
And Luna has to request her dox be taken down, just like the rest of us.
Turncoat, you're just the toilet cleaner, remember. So, do you're fucking job properly.
Sun Puddles stated: source post
So if its in chat, is it or is it not a dox? Especially if the member is not named by ...user name....??
I mean it's technically a dox. But the reason we have our rule about doxxing, is because people are worried about how having their info on this site might affect them irl. I doubt having it posted in chat would have much effect. If nothing else, this is definitely worth discussion.