Sociopath Community

That is a bunch of bullshit.

What you're trying to tell me is that turncoat was too stupid to see that Pink was only denying the information because she didn't want to admit it was hers. 

Do you think everyone here is just going to want to openly admit the information posted is actually theirs? 

What if the person being doxed has been hospitalized for awhile or gone on vacation for a month, or some other reason that causes them to be absent for a length of time. Is turncoat just going to wait until they return while that information is still openly exposed to potential abuse and exploitation?

Yeah, it's not really more moderation, it's faster moderation you're in favor of.

Whether or not you agree that the consensus makes a rule, there has been consistency.  He has very consistently deleted doxxes upon the request of the doxxed party.  Just as he has consistently refused to remove doxxes when requested by a third party.  Regardless of whether you care for the rule, or even believe that it is a rule, there absolutely has been consistency.

"What you're trying to tell me is that turncoat was too stupid to see that Pink was only denying the information because she didn't want to admit it was hers."

That's not even close.  I said that he's been consistent in following that rule, whether you care for it or not.  Do you deny that he's followed that rule to the letter?

"Do you think everyone here is just going to want to openly admit the information posted is actually theirs?"

They're free to PM TC, rather than publicly admit.

"What if the person being doxed has been hospitalized for awhile or gone on vacation for a month, or some other reason that causes them to be absent for a length of time. Is turncoat just going to wait until they return while that information is still openly exposed to potential abuse and exploitation?"

Yes.  Because that is how the rule currently stands.  If you have a problem with that rule, fine.  But that does nothing to negate his consistency.

"Do you think everyone here is just going to want to openly admit the information posted is actually theirs?"
"She's the only one who hadn't. With everyone else it's been no hassle."

That may not always be the case. The past doesn't always predict the future in situations like this.

"Is turncoat just going to wait until they return while that information is still openly exposed to potential abuse and exploitation?"
"Is this place supposed to be against doxing?"

You don't think it should be? 

I'm sure there are people here who would not like it if they were doxed.

"Do you think everyone here is just going to want to openly admit the information posted is actually theirs?"
She's the only one who hadn't. With everyone else it's been no hassle.

"Is turncoat just going to wait until they return while that information is still openly exposed to potential abuse and exploitation?"
Is this place supposed to be against doxing?

"You don't think it should be?"
Personally, no, I don't think it should be, but it's not solely up to me.

"I'm sure there are people here who would not like it if they were doxed."

There are also people here who don't like being called a faggot, don't like being trolled, don't like being lied to, don't like being disagreed with.  What's your point?

I don't believe turncoat has shown consistency, not with the way he toyed with Pink, purposefully delaying the process.

What I suggested would fix a lot of problems here when it comes to doxing, including the absentee problem for those who aren't here to speak on their own behalf.

You can't see any difference between insulting someone and exposing information about them that could be abused and exploited?

Yeah.. okay... I'm done discussing this for now. Maybe I'll get back to it later when you've grown a brain cell or two.