Your skew is somewhat disorienting to try to unravel. It not only misses obvious points, but it runs for miles until it has almost nothing to do with the actual story beyond grasping at a few, old, loose bookmarks and some conspiracy groupings that rationalize said skew through alienating yourself from the accusers through one big outgroup ad hominem.
I remember that convo, WW. You pm'ed me to ask about it.
I told you I have insomnia when I have insomnia. I debate with idiots when I debate with idiots.
One action does not cause the other.
I've stayed up plenty of nights here posting about the turkey I just cooked and the music I'm listening to, and whatever else is on my mind. It doesn't hurt. xD
Spark? As in sugar was only pretending to like me so she could dig for info to use against me later?
I doubt that. She would have asked for my name and pics back in December. I might have given both when she was still being nice, too.
As it was, all she got was a couple of my sock puppets, which I volunteered.
That ridiculous business with the name my friends call me happened later, after sugar started inventing bullshit to post about me. (That name is all over this forum and all over the internet for anybody who's not too lazy to google, btw.) If she had really been trying to buddy up to me to get more info, don'tcha think she would have asked for that name and a few thread titles when we were still friendly?