XD
(This text is only to make up for the minimum amount of text required in order to post.)
(Actually, it certainly is in excess of the required minimum. License for comedic purposes taken.)
If i have to be serious, which if some can't tell, i have not been for a while, i do rather think i am True Neutral.
Because the lawful neutral i imagine does not fit with the world as it. So i disregard whatever doesn't fit with my ideas. Which doesn't maintain lawful neutral.
Or so i understand.
WW3 stated: source post
I'm thinking of true neutral or maybe neutral good.
I strongly disagree with that.
" A neutral character does what seems to be a good idea. She doesn't feel strongly one way or the other when it comes to good vs. evil or law vs. chaos. Most neutral characters exhibit a lack of conviction or bias rather than a commitment to neutrality. Such a character thinks of good as better than evil-after all, she would rather have good neighbors and rulers than evil ones. Still, she's not personally committed to upholding good in any abstract or universal way. "
" A chaotic neutral character follows his whims. He is an individualist first and last. He values his own liberty but doesn't strive to protect others' freedom. He avoids authority, resents restrictions, and challenges traditions. A chaotic neutral character does not intentionally disrupt organizations as part of a campaign of anarchy. To do so, he would have to be motivated either by good (and a desire to liberate others) or evil (and a desire to make those different from himself suffer). A chaotic neutral character may be unpredictable, but his behavior is not totally random. He is not as likely to jump off a bridge as to cross it. "
I fit much better with chaotic neutral
so i read this:
http://easydamus.com/lawfulneutral.html
and that is perfect for me.
we should all be like that, it will be just right.