"The fucking ban/mute system was invented for dex, Turncoat."
Back when he was spamming the place way more obviously, yeah. At the moment it's more for the accounts making a more literal mess out of the place.
"Banning Dex is why TK was named as first mod in Sociopath World history."
Banning Dex because of what he was doing is why she was given mod powers, not just for being Dex.
"We know he's annoying, we know he spams, we know his autism can never be cured."
The underlined portion is the only part that's really against any rules, and if he's spamming he's being a lot more controlled about it or something (or he's behind the other accounts).
"He changes his username and each time he gets treated like he's a different person."
And then if banned he'd just make more and more accounts. Why go after him when he's not even misbehaving?
"Threads like "Don't be a vagina clown by crazyfartingclowns" are no better than spam."
And this is along the lines of why I bothered making the topic, attempting to identify the difference between spam and free speech. Spamming the letter F, a video link, banana stuff, random code, that doesn't make for any discussion, while saying stuff people don't agree with is another story.
"I've witnessed dex spamming the chat the other day."
Screencap it next time, he hasn't been doing much from what I've seen.
"I see dex shit all over the forum."
If you're meaning the long trains of blatant spam, we don't know that that's him. If you're meaning the "God will save you" stuff, is that really spam?
"Muting dex on the forum is the next best thing after ripping his throat off."
Then another account is made and we're back at square one.
So, is this "spam" deletion bit about quality control or stopping literal repetition? That's up to the majority, not me, and if there is a line drawn for quality where is said line?