Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
Posts: 1121
Introduction

 

by serum

Yes but you went and made special post just to say you don't care. If I was so irrelevant I don't think you would bother.

 On the other hand, it's possible you're underestimating how bored everyone on this forum is. : /

Posts: 524
Introduction

Welcome.

Posts: 658
Introduction

top kek

Posts: 10218
Introduction

I think this one's content with fishing with boring bait.

Posts: 956
Introduction

Soooooo are you ever going to post anything of worth, serum? Or sit here all day and defend yourself

Posts: 956
Introduction

Posts: 480
Introduction

.

Posts: 10218
Introduction

"No he implied. I thought he might but I didnt assume it just because he said so."

When I mentioned casting doubt, it's more like how I appear has had some people assume "sociopath", then I correct them with my actual diagnosis. By seeing that I'm not a sociopath, it's likely to increase the odds of "Who else here isn't a sociopath? Maybe I'm not a sociopath, there's all sorts of reasons I could be this way" passing through a user's mind.

It's sad that I have to explain that, it's been self demonstrated multiple times. You must be less observant than you give credit~

Posts: 2485
Introduction

 

by serum

I didnt think turncoat claimed that . I think others on here think they are though.

Some here do claim to be sociopaths. I don't see a problem with anyone claiming to be one on a forum like this.

Though, other people seem to make a big issue out of it when that happens.

I mean, if you know you're a sociopath, or just think you're one, then what's wrong with openly admitting it here if it's something you'd like to discuss. After all, the forum is called Sociopath Community, yet discussing your own sociopathy is clearly a taboo subject here.

I can only imagine how much shit M.E Thomas would get if she were actually here, and to think she wrote a whole fucking book about her sociopathy.

Posts: 658
Introduction

The only way to abuse your admin powers is to use them to benefit yourself, regardless of anything else.

Which you did. The only justification and/or rationalization about that ban was that he posted your information.

 

Now if we assume you are correct and you didn't abuse your power and there are no rules, then why did you make new rules?

Why did you ignore my statement about making new rules?

If you did nothing out of place, then there is no need for rules because there are no rules.

 

On the other hand, now there are rules. So now you can only work within those rules, is that correct? Why did you make the rules? You abused your powers when you made these rules.

This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.