It's a good thing the world is so big and full of possibility, then. : )
by MrOmegaPhiYes... it is also a traditional garment used by the mikmaq indians.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mi%27kmaq_people
Here is their "suckerfish writing"... looks to be middle eastern hieroglyphs...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mi'kmaq_hieroglyphic_writing
The migration of ancient peoples into the americas is another story all together.
Here is the first written contact by ancient peoples with the New World (this is information that 99.9% of the population does not know about).
29 Minutes and 22 Seconds into it, translation, with the name of the boat, the king who ordered the engraving, the reason for the trip and the time during the EQUINOX was passing through the sky! Amazing!
Thread in full...
It predates current science and thier accepted contact with the new world by over 1,000 years.
http://historum.com/american-history/62719-who-really-discovered-america-32.html
I am some fukin asshole who knows nothing, yet these are clear FACTS... it is no co-incidence that I know these things. The rest of the world is highly institutionalized and slaving away every last drop of thier existence on a hyper consumerist agenda.
Meanwhile, there is no doubt in my mind there are others who know substantially more than me.
Where I'm from, we refer to them as Natives. Once given the shorter end of the stick, but in all actuality they get the most benefits these days. I wouldn't mind living tax free.
When the British arrived, there they found Natives that settled long before they did. When the Spanish set sail around the world for the supposed sake or proving the world to be round, they also found civilizations already living on the soil they claimed. From the Caribbean, to Mexico and so on.
In a time when telecommunication did not exist, it was easier to write history and make something of themselves. It was always the winner who wrote history.
Even in the classroom, no one seems to make sense of the fact there were civilizations already present. It's actually common sense. The historians surely coveted the land before they decided it was time venture out and rule.
In many cases I myself wrote in these very pages how the ancients preach facts. Sumerian's knew the world wasn't flat 6,000 years ago. Egyptians and just about every civilization that built a temple also knew the world was round, and they expressed it in a way that boggles the mind.
Not to sound racist, but none of these civilizations are white. That's just an observation. The myths, the historical cover ups, the disturbance of civilizations by hostile takeover, the bloodshed and tyranny. All white people. That was just another observation, but to add to that. The belief the world was flat, religious contradiction and falsehood like Jesus with European features, and other tricks.
The great Ancients knew stuff, and were very educated too. It's just the white man invented the flint lock and claimed what they gained by force, and also sweeped history under the rug while the text book continues to teach. Again, not being racist, just an observation.
Do you understand why science is not about the truth? The truth does not fit the agenda of profit and hyper consumerist lifestyles.
On the most part, science is geared to shun any spiritual teaching while the most profound scientists in history come to the conclusion that there is a force vastly superior to man at play, and this force is indeed very conscious.
Spirituality is vastly liberating, and more than suggestive of the self, family and friends to be more valuable than profit and material possessions. Drugs are illegal, not because they can be harmful or addictive, but because they promote revolutionary thinking. Tobacco does not, so that's fine. Even profitable. Same with alcohol. Marijuana no, cocain's long term effects are a good excuse to outlaw anything with, as they say "a narcotic effect".
In short, what kills the most and makes people dumb, is fair game. In truth, it's not the outlaw that fears the police or the law. It's those who stay inbound because of law.
There is science, then there is mainstream science. Relative to mainstream media and Government. In the information age, the people are the leading source. The internet on a technological scale, is most likely our final life line. They'll push to regulate it, meaning we'll pay per site, which will dampen the things we learn and share with one another. I watched the Internet grow from the 90's till now. It got faster and more congested, but to me it also feels like Google itself is getting dumber.
50,000 years of human history and we barely have a sliver. It is human nature, this hyper consumerist profiteering.
Yes.
@spatial mind - you are losing me with the aluminum. Tell you what, why don't you try and explain to me why the asteroid belt exists.
That should be easy enough. PLEASE REMEMBER, You are an ACCRETIONIST!!!
Why don't I ? Because I'm not even trying to explain why the asteroid belt exist chief. Why expect me to deliver first what you wish to discuss, just say it already.
As for the Aluminum, like the ones delivered from the meteors, as a metal, it is in part comprised of hydrogen.
Now the atmosphere has Hydrogen in the .0000, while one can claim meteor showers do not occur enough to possibly explain why the Earth's water is increasing, one must take into account how old the Earth just might be. Using science as a reference, they estimate 140,000,000 asteroids burn in our atmosphere a year. That's average, last 2 years we had spikes. Though an asteroid will get a VERY thorough cremation as it comes too close to Earth, again with Aluminum composites included, the matter of which it's comprised of will somewhat remain intact. Surely the burning process is a form of synthesis, and what becomes of the Hydrogen compound ?
Some say the hydrogen (again part of aluminum) will remain at the top layer, and always be the lesser part of the atmosphere, even though the atmosphere will continue to undergo billions of more years of receiving hydrogen payloads from countless meteors beyond "trillions more" to come.
The sprites are a nice find, when it comes to these things, I do not rest my case, but to me, meteors being the cause of, well, the Earth's growth, seems more plausible to me than a side effect, the sprites, manifesting matter from 0 point. Doesn't mean I'll shut the book and move on from this channel, cause I, nor you, or anyone can explain how sprite makes water, either it uses materials found in the air or not.
The water for the earth did not arrive via comets or accretion.
You don't know that.
Water falls apart into mist in zero gravity, and in space that mist turns into ice particles in the realm of maybe a couple molecule parts per TRILLION!! You need quite literally hundreds of billions of comets pummeling the earth to account for it's giant oceans.
Mist ? Water must saturate before it's converted into a gas form. In 0 gravity, a liquid, or water, becomes a sphere. Which is interesting cause the Earth is a sphere, and though she generates gravity, Mother Gaia is actually orbiting the Sun in 0 gravity. Now in a vacuum like space, the water will break out into beads before it freezes, and granted it's in a warm area out there, it will be a wobbly sphere in motion, then saturate anyway.
As for the amount of Meteors required to meet your expectations in terms of ocean growth.
They say the Earth is 4.5 billion years old. Meteors are nothing new, and if we average 140 million meteor burns for every estimated year of the Earth's age, not including the spikes or more uneventful payload years.... 6.3e+20
I honestly have to research what the hell number that is suppose to represent, but it's probably so freaky, to say it wouldn't even sound like English.
There is water on the moon. The moon was not smashed from the side of the earth via a large comet early in it's history. It does not have enough water on it's surface to support the idea that Earth has been bombarded by ice comets for billions of years.
If anything, we've gotten the debris from comets. If a Comet hit Earth, we'd probably be done and the Earth itself will come with us.
The moons atmosphere is weak compared to the Earth's oxygen rich environment. They say the Water on the moon is all frozen and hiding in cool shaded areas. The rest of the water probably saturated and broke free from the moons atmosphere and went into space. What's interesting is, moon rocks are Hydrogen rich. NASA says they have successfully made air out of moon rock. Something like that.
@spatial, you said,
We do have meteors that burn up in our atmosphere, who knows, maybe thousands of them every day.
Not on the scale required to fill the oceans!!
Don't you know with time, anything is possible ? See my last paragraph.
Lightning on the other hand is a constant and happens with absolute regularity.
It is estimated that lightning hits the Earth 100 times each second. That's 8.6 million strikes per day and over three billion each year.
That is normal lightning. Sprite lightning was only discovered in 1999. It can produce enough water to flood entire neighbourhoods with quick downfalls.
Okay. I can't seem to find any reliable sources for this.
You know, the mind is so powerful, if you seriously believe that, and you seem passionate about it, there will come a time when it will be discovered to be as you say. Without a source, I can only pass that off of theory backed by magical thinking, you are after all, just another guy, no ?
Here is something you must absolutely answer if you have any sense of logic or any interest in reality.
WHY IS LIGHTNING AND THUNDER ALWAYS FOLLOWED BY A RAIN STORM???!!!
Please stick to occams razor and the new discovery of sprite lightning which is a MASSIVE discovery. It is not a minor one. It is Earth shattering!!
Occam's razor.
In reality, it sometimes rains without lightning. Also, we never see lightning without the cloud.
To be honest, It's the lightning that follows the cloud, but rather, the cloud partakes in the process of creating a bolt of lightning.
As for thunder, it's nothing more than the sound of lightning ripping through the air. To the core, lightning is very thin, microscopic even. It just generates so much light along it's line, if it were as thick as it looked, the shock wave from the boom would probably turn us into jelly cause it's so damn fast.
.
.
.
As we visit oceans, and the great lakes. We can feel the wind.....
The wind is but a draft, created by the tremendous volume of water saturating and converting into gas form. We have pressure it won't go too far up...
The moisture is in the air. As a matter of fact. It's so fine, the gas is as invisible as air. At least, we cannot see it cause it's not saturating at boiling point. But there is so much, it just keeps going up into the air, and forms clouds as it stops at a certain altitude. They look fluffy, but the are actually wet.
.
.
.
The water is literally flying in the sky, there's lots up there, if we catch it, we can have a cool drink, and bathe our skin. When will it comes down ? Is it predetermined ? These questions are old. I like the new ones better. Sprites ? Show me more.
@spatial mind...
Look at the moon... if the water for the earth came from ice comets, then the moon would be covered in ice balls...
I cannot help you... you have no spacial intelligence...
That is okay, because as you are discovering... people cannot even figure out the Bermuda triangle. The world is really a bunch of idiotic cows who huddle together in hopes of safety in numbers. Believe what you want.
What's that you say? There doesn't need to be ice balls on the moon if the earth is covered in water delivered by meteors because it is only tiny parts of water in the comets?
Then accretion theory would clearly show the surface of the earth as purely extraterrestrial in material.
FUK PEOPLE!!!! TAKE THE FUKING SHIT OUT OF YOUR EARS AND USE YOUR BRAIN!!!!
@edvard - strange by your standards... absolute brilliance by those who study and are educated. They are the exception.
@spatial, you said, "In reality, it sometimes rains without lightning. Also, we never see lightning without the cloud."
That is NOT Occums razor!!!!
I said that thunder and lighting rarely if ever, (as I am totally unaware of any such event), happen without rain. Not ALL the water that rains is from the bonding of hydrogen and oxygen atoms in the atmosphere, only some of it. The same rules of evaporation still apply.