by Freedom Fighters Unite
I did not simply make "claims"...I have shown archaeological evidence for what I have said. I have shown video footage. I have done more than you have, sitting on your computer chair as a cynic with nothing to bring to the table.
You've done nothing but make claims. What you consider "evidence" is just a collection of more claims. They were complexified interpretations of largely subjective or, simply, universally unrecognized observations. For a debate to be successful, everyone involved must agree on some fundamental concepts of existence. How do you expect us to refute your hypothesis if we can't agree on the fundamental "observations" that are intended to be the basis of your evidence?