by anastaciaWell obviously, I wouldn't expect you to be the tails or ass of that operation. ;)
How so? Did Mr.Omega ever day he think prostitutes are dirty? Or is your mind unable to understand the variable synonymous meaning with the word dirty.
Dirty Dancing... that's what he meant... get your self righteous head out of the sewer.
Prostitutes are not disease ridden. Crack hoes are... There is a big difference.
by Spatial MindThe easy ones are just casual sex, she will supply consumables such as alcohol or something to get high off of.
She will?
You make it sound as though that's a definite in every situation, which isn't always the case.
The one a man wants to bang is a challenge, and she has an expensive price tag in some way shape or form.
Not much of a challenge really when you consider that if he wants a fuck with a price tag, all he has to do is pay a whore.
It's because of you 'slutty' men that women are doing so well in the sex trade.
nature between opposite sex has its way when we score a desired catch.
What define's a desired catch?
How is sticking your dick in her any different than sticking your dick in a 'hoe' if 'hoe' simply means a woman who enjoys casual sex.
How do you know your 'desired catch' didn't have quite a few sexual partners before you. She could just be playing hard to get simply because she enjoys the chase, but has no interest in you other than for sex - to use and discard afterwards.
"This is why we can both agree there's no point in explaining things to you."
Can we? I think there's no point in trying to change me, but explaining and discussing can be done without that as the endgame goal, can't it?
As for said "Editing", the only editing is posting fragments of your texts instead of the entire thing that serve as placeholders or markers to save space and see where within your post I am referencing (I even bother to make sure they're in order for easier cross-referencing). In many cases I only am meaning to target a portion of your post to dissect it for a more in-depth understanding, since the entirety of the message is formed from said fragments. You know which portion of your bit I'm talking about, I know what portion of your bit I'm talking about, and anyone with the patience to read your posts will know what the sentence I've captured is about. If they don't read your posts and judge only from the fragments I'm referentially nabbing, then they're the ones navigating toward misunderstanding. Any portions I don't comment on I had nothing to say to, or it was covered by another portion.
"When I'm in opposition of things I see, like under aged jail bait hoeing away.Then maybe I'll drop my 2 cents like I did today, and you will resent that making this your problem."
It's still none of your business what said "under aged jail bait" is doing until they try to involve you in it in some way. It's their lives.
Wait, what would I be resenting exactly? 
"Fake hoes like undercover cops for some reason strike me as worse. Maybe because they are not real prostitutes and they charge guys for agreeing to pay for sex and though there are no transactions the guy gets charged as though something happened."
If it wasn't undercover cops, something likely would have happened, and it's the responsibility of the undercover to make sure that they've given out enough evidence against themselves before pushing for a charge. Come on, if they had no interest in them they'd not be falling for such shmuck bait in the first place.
"Under aged girls working for police and some tv show by acting like sluts is poor conditioning for the future of law enforcement. It's almost like Minority Report where thoughts are policed rather than actions."
Would you prefer they prey on someone first? It's better they target "fakes" than the genuine article, and the fear that any little girl on the internet could secretly be a cop makes them less likely to act on impulses out of fear. If the person had no interest in little girls, they'd not get trapped by cops pretending to be them. Sometimes you need to use what may be viewed as scummy tactics to catch supposedly scummy people, and it only enters the realm of "Think Police" if they target them before their motives are as clear as day.
"Biblically I think it's you who needs not judge."
I dragged The Bible into this because it's something you use as a form of reasoning at times, a way for me to speak in a language that carries the same name as your own faith instead of pushing it in a flavor closer to my own words, words that would likely be much easier to discard. Attempting to sway me with words like "Biblically" is barking up the wrong tree since The Bible to me is just a book I can use against others.
"These actions are mine, and it's me who will be accountable for the choices I make."
People still have to face the weight of "your actions", which makes them not just something of yours anymore once no longer within only your mind.
Holy shit Tony. I wonder if you have any sane friends around that don't get put off by your annoying high horse attitude and pompous speech.
"Maybe because they are not real prostitutes and they charge guys for agreeing to pay for sex and though there are no transactions the guy gets charged as though something happened."
So what's your real issue, that you didn't get to bang the cop or that you didn't get the money back? lmao.
You know, I'll never forget reading back to your original thread on Sociopath World a couple of years ago, where you talked about that woman who (you felt) had taken advantage of you. I remember you made a list with every little shit you had done for her, and what she had done for you. I'll try to see if I can get my hands on those posts, they were really something.
No wonder you replied the way you did in Luna's thread also... You consider every relationship you have as a trade that has to be profitable for you. It's one thing that narcs have in common with sociopaths I suppose.
Spatial is like 1940s businessman hot.
I'm positive the bait girls for To Catch a Predator (in the US at least) must be 18+ because they can't allow the crime to happen. They arrest the people based on intent. These same men could drive to South America and fuck a legal 14 year old, but they want the perceived jailbait. The people who set up the trap can't legally have a minor lure adults or even other minors. However, I bet many of the men would never otherwise find a near enough minor able to see them and only show bc the "actress" is so persuading. Like pigs selling hookers or blow it should be entrapment but isn't.
"However, I bet many of the men would never otherwise find a near enough minor able to see them and only show bc the "actress" is so persuading."
Many of them are likely repeat offenders that had an unlucky break down the line, but it would be interesting to see the chat logs in their entirety as opposed to the somewhat contextless tidbits they show the audience. It'd be one thing if they never revealed how young they are, but it's something else entirely once the underage detail is known.
Many of them bring alcohol to share with minors as well. Even if a minor is begging for it, is it really right for them to bring it? I don't know about you, but if a 14 year old started hitting on me my response wouldn't be to drive down there with alcohol in hand and act on it, let alone flirt back. Lack of personal interest aside, it's reckless.
If someone meant to purchase a bag of coke, but ended up with a bag of sugar, then there is no reason to make an arrest.
The concept is the same as someone thinking about breaking the law, but not following through with it.
A speeder cannot be ticketed unless he was clocked speeding. In the case of under cover police, it's the cop who commits the crime while the accused did not partake in a real crime, nor did he illegally distribute money.
I'm in opposition of policing thoughts. Sadly, those who have the most to lose are the ones doing the least to prevent a way of life where it will be less free.
On the side. Prostitution in my opinion shouldn't even be illegal.
