Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
Posts: 690
Black On White Racism In America

Oh, look - Whoameye's feeling all sensitive again. You can tell when he's feeling sensitive cos every time someone disagrees with something he's said and calls him out for being a barely-literate fool, he types a long-ass justification of his idiotic viewpoints onto his iPad (which, BTW, didn't catch all of the spelling errors this time, let alone the grammatical errors).

Whoa, at the rate you're going, you just might miss out on wooing Thrill. Your internet persona doesn't seem badass enough. TK wants a MAN, Whoa!

Posts: 5426
Black On White Racism In America

Wow you're a fucking talker.

Ok, first an elementary lesson on how not to act like a man without balls. In a situation like this address the person you disagree with directly instead of bitching about them and their points in 3rd person in a big monologue. That just shows you're scared of confrontation.    

Second, you dismissed my points because apparently I believe everyone's equal or wtf "equally related". Never said that, never thought that, it's crap. You pulled that assumption out of your ass because you jump to conclusions that are convenient to you and don't see alternatives to your shitty logic. It's why everyone here should question and doubt everything that comes out of you.

I'm glad you're back, to be honest. You're both arrogant and ignorant, and you're going to get your ass handed to you big time.

Posts: 135
Black On White Racism In America

 

There are no races. We are all equal.

Posts: 135
Black On White Racism In America

Yes, I am indeed arrogant. As for me being ignorant and me getting "my ass handed": HA HA HA HA HA HA HA.

I'm not scared of debating with you, fuckface. I just don't have the patience. It became very clear to me after that post where you compare a human being with a virus that you're beyond hope, and I have much better things to do with my time than trying to teach you how to think. For the looks of it I'd have more success teaching quantum mechanics to a  dog, lol.

 Second, you dismissed my points because apparently I believe everyone's equal or wtf "equally related". Never said that, never thought that, it's crap.

It's IMPLIED in your posts, moron. Or did they forget to teach you the concept of implication back in retard school, retard? Here, take a look: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implication

If you say there are no different races, it's because you believe all races are "equal". You don't need to spell that out for me, I just need to use my brain to draw this LOGICAL CONSEQUENCE out of your first proposition. 

"If Edvard doesn't believe in different races (and is outraged at the mere thought of this idea), it means he thinks blacks and whites are equal, or at any rate equally-related enough for us, as scientific human beings, to disregard their tiny, negligible differences" â€” THAT'S what any intelligent person takes from your posts after reading them. And, as I just explained in all my posts, yes, we are all homo sapiens, for fuck's sake but some of groups of us are different enough from other groups to be considered exactly the same (i.e. to be considered the same race).

Posts: 5426
Black On White Racism In America

 

by Etzel

Yes, I am indeed arrogant. As for me being ignorant and me getting "my ass handed": HA HA HA HA HA HA HA.

I'm not scared of debating with you, fuckface. I just don't have the patience. It became very clear to me after that post where you compare a human being with a virus that you're beyond hope, and I have much better things to do with my time than trying to teach you how to think. For the looks of it I'd have more success teaching quantum mechanics to a  dog, lol.

 Second, you dismissed my points because apparently I believe everyone's equal or wtf "equally related". Never said that, never thought that, it's crap.

It's IMPLIED in your posts, moron. Or did they forget to teach you the concept of implication back in retard school, retard? Here, take a look: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implication

If you say there are no different races, it's because you believe all races are "equal". You don't need to spell that out for me, I just need to use my brain to draw this LOGICAL CONSEQUENCE out of your first proposition. 

"If Edvard doesn't believe in different races (and is outraged at the mere thought of this idea), it means he thinks blacks and whites are equal, or at any rate equally-related enough for us, as scientific human beings, to disregard their tiny, negligible differences" â€” THAT'S what any intelligent person takes from your posts after reading them. And, as I just explained in all my posts, yes, we are all homo sapiens, for fuck's sake but some of groups of us are different enough from other groups to be considered exactly the same (i.e. to be considered the same race).

You honestly don't see any difference between "no race is superior to the other" and "everyone's equal", don't you pal. Here's an idea that could change your little nerdy mentality. I judge people individually. Some men are better than others if we consider different criteria. For example, I genuinely think you're more stupid than some black people I know, and that makes them better than you at expressing their ideas. So, more powerful in many ways.

You say crap like, whites are more powerful than blacks because whites killed more blacks. You have a problem when I say that's a stupid argument, since viruses kill people and you'd never say viruses are more powerful. You mock my comparison but you compare lions and tigers to black and white people, as if people are as uniform and simple as animals.

Everything you say points to you being a socially awkward bookworm who has never actually got out there to know people and feel the pulse of life. I've been on every continent, met, befriended, hated and fucked people from all races. If you did all that, experienced what I experienced and still kept your idea that judging people by race and not by they individuality makes any sense, I'll shoot a nigger for you buddy. But you're probably not going to do that, you'll just sit there reading books of other deluded reclusive nerds like you who got lost in distorted ideas of how the world and people are, instead of actually getting to know them. But who knows, maybe one day when you're older and wiser and hopefully lost some of your social anxiety or whatever the fuck prevents you from actually familiarizing yourself with the human mind, you'll look back to these days and see yourself as the snotty little kid I perceive you as right now.

Posts: 135
Black On White Racism In America

Me, a few pages ago:

And in the heads of intelligent people, culture is the only criterium you can use to compare races — why? because no one is born on a tabula rasa.

This is, at bottom, what's riling up everyone who denies with all their energy the existence of races â€” and the logical implication that follows from this fact, which is that some races are superior to others. (Order of rank follows immediately after we recognize distinctions.)

But the people want to believe everyone is born on a tabula rasa. They want to believe that if one makes "the right moves" one can reach the top. That everyone's starting point is the same. But can a pig become a human if he makes "the right moves"? Of course not! Becoming an intelligent human being is not an option in the pig's narrow realm of possibilities... There's so much a pig can do, and no matter what he does an intelligent human being will always be superior to him! And this is why the pig must declare that there are no pigs and no humans! that we are all "liveforms"! and "therefore" "equal"! 

The pigs want to erase their entire past. They want to start the game from scratch, and this is why when someone tries to put some sense back into their heads by telling them they are just pigs, they must slander him with all their strength. This is the pig psychology. A parable.

But of course now some guy will say "Buy hey! It's not the aboriginal's fault they evolved to become much less developed than the Europeans! It's just happened that way. The Europeans were lucky to be born in such a hostile and dangerous environment. It was the environment which dictated the European's fate! So the aboriginals could've become as awesome as the Greeks or the Romans or whatever, they just lacked the appropriate "external conditions" for that! So stop being an idiot Etzel and recognize that both the aboriginal and the European have the same potential! Recognize that both of them are born the same!"

And a reply like that would simply get a smile out of me. Because it's true indeed that the environment dictated the European's fate, and perhaps true that had the aboriginal been placed in such an environment for such a protracted period of time, he'd be just as awesome as the European â€” but he didn't. And it's precisely the fact that he didn't that I'm analyzing here. You cannot erase history, my little pig friend! And the only way to understand why you are a pig is to LOOK AT THE PAST. So all I'm saying is that not only did the environment dictate the fortunate fate of the European, it OUTRIGHT SHAPED HIM. 

His environment was such a hostile one, for such a long time, that he was FORCED to become strong. And only the strong would indeed survive. Is it any wonder that a few millennia of this are enough to CHANGE the brain of the race? So that the European born today IS POTENTIALLY MUCH SMARTER AND STRONGER than the European of 100.000 years ago? That his realm of possibilities has been expanded? So that the healthy European and the healthy aboriginal from peaceful Australia born today are completely different from one another? Nietzsche:

Evil.— Examine the lives of the best and most fruitful people and peoples and ask yourselves whether a tree that is supposed to grow to a proud height can dispense with bad weather and storms; whether misfortune and external resistance, some kinds of hatred, jealousy, stubborness, mistrust, hardness, avarice, and violence do not belong among the favorable conditions without which any great growth even of virtue is scarcely possible. The poison of which weaker natures perish strengthens the strong — nor do they call it poison.

That's what I mean when I say no one is born on a tabula rasa. You can't just erase the entire past of mankind, my dear pig friend. And facing your past is indeed the first thing you must do to stop being a pig and start being awesome! 

This the same reason, incidentally, why men are better at analytical thinking than women. Men were SHAPED into being smarter. WAR shaped them into being stronger and smarter than women. And these brain differences are even more profound and pronounced than the racial differences I'm espousing here â€” for these differences have been shaped for an even longer time period. 

This is not to say that SOME women are smarter than SOME men, as it should go without saying, but unfortunately must be said. Just as SOME women are stronger than SOME men. The exception does not disprove the rule, and the rule is precisely what I'm trying to delineate here, not the fucking exceptions.

 I'm aware, by the way, that to some people the things I just said here will be too much to swallow, but the truth is supposed to be harsh. However, there's no reason for you pigs to choke on your resentment. Because (Nietzsche again): 

Principle: There is an element of decay in everything that characterizes modern man: but close beside this sickness stand signs of an untested force and powerfulness of the soul. The same reasons that produce the increasing smallness of man drive the stronger and rarer individuals up to greatness.

And we even have a practical example of this quote: compare all the spoiled rich kids ever who accomplish nothing in their lives to Hitler who for some time was sleeping in the streets, but eventually came to rule an extremely powerful empire. So if you are still not exactly sure if you're a pig or a human being, by all means stop complaining about your past (if you're not outright denying it, that is), learn from it, stop being such a resentful little worm, and START BECOMING AWESOME.

Posts: 433
Black On White Racism In America

Um excuse me, these two specimens of the homo sapiens sapiens species have the exact same bone structure! In addition, there is no genetic difference at all that would categorize them as different. The only difference is the concentration of melanin in their skin!

Posts: 408
Black On White Racism In America

 

by Etzel
One of the reasons I'm so good at thinking is actually the fact that I BARELY READ ANY BOOKS. 

 I think that entire post can be summed up with this quote.

Posts: 174
Black On White Racism In America

What's known as 'racism' is actually perfectly natural.

Posts: 135
Black On White Racism In America

You honestly don't see any other option between "no other race is superior to the other" and "everyone's equal", don't you pal.

I already told you that once you admit there are no two equal things, order of rank follows immediately. It's not my fault you never learned to read properly. If you cannot see why this is as is, it's your problem. It's beyond my powers to explain to you these trivial things. Also, you are perverting logic the way you compare a human being to a virus. Just because viruses kill human beings, it does not mean they are more powerful. The criteria for power is not ONLY "who kills who" (even though this helps when comparing two similar objects, like surprise surprise lions and tigers, or blacks and whites) but more specifically PROPERLY COORDINATED COMPLEXITY. And what you are doing is taking a fucking VIRUS which is an object placed an enormous order of magnitude of complexity BELLOW that of a human being, and declaring it superior to the latter. You show up with a virus that kills millions of people and fancy you "proved me wrong" -- except your comparison IS EXTREMELY STUPID, since healthy human beings are OBVIOUSLY much more COMPLEX and PROPERLY COORDINATED than a shitty virus. Perhaps this quote will help you:

Nietzsche: "My general view.— First proposition: man as a species is not progressing. Higher types are indeed attained, but they do not last. The level of the species is not raised.

Second proposition: man as a species does not represent any progress compared with any other animal. The whole animal and vegetable kingdom does not evolve from the lower to the higher — but all at the same time, in utter disorder, over and against each other. The richest and most complex forms — for the expression "higher type" means no more than this — perish more easily: only the lowest preserve an apparent indestructibility. The former are achieved only rarely and maintain their superiority with difficulty; the latter are favored by a compromising fruitfulness.

Among men, too, the higher types, the lucky strokes of evolution, perish most easily as fortunes change. They are exposed to every kind of decadence: they are extreme, and that almost means decadents.

The brief spell of beauty, of genius, of Ceasar, is sui generis: such things are not inherited. The type is hereditary; a type is nothing extreme, no "lucky stroke"—

This is not due to any special fatality or malevolence of nature, but simply to the concept "higher nature": the higher type represents an incomparably greater complexity — a greater sum of co-ordinating elements: so its disintegration is also incomparably more likely. The "genius" is the sublimest machine there is — consequently the most fragile."

"But how can the most powerful being be simultaneously the most fragile?" you will, no doubt, wonder. Too bad I don't feel like explaining why (since even if I did you would so clearly lack the brains to understand me anyway). 

Everything you say points to you being a socially awkward bookworm who has never actually got out there to know people and feel the pulse of life.

I am sure you know everything about "social awkwardness" and "bookworms". 

I've been on every continent, met, befriended, hated and fucked people from all races.

And this is why I know you are beyond hope. Because if even with all these experiences you still fail so much at thinking, there's simply no way to make you smarter. Though I'm sure your "experiences" are pathetic next to mine, if that's what you're wondering. I mean, how else would you remain so naive, idealistic and so full of "good intentions" after being on "every continent". Perhaps you're the kind of "traveler" that goes to another country on the weekend to take some pictures, buy some postcards and who then happily returns to his little slave life of 9 to 5 jobs? I.e. perhaps you're a tourist. Because I don't want to believe a true traveler would be as stupid as you (though this guy (http://www.wanderingearl.com/) is indeed kind of stupid despite his amazing repertoire of experiences).

But you're probably not going to do that, you'll just sit there reading books of other deluded reclusive nerds like you who got lost in distorted ideas of how the world and people are, instead of actually getting to know them.

One of the reasons I'm so good at thinking is actually the fact that I BARELY READ ANY BOOKS. I only read philosophy books (—because I need to) and the occasional biographies or history books. Schopenhauer has already explained why reading too much is not a good idea:

http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/s/schopenhauer/arthur/essays/chapter3.html

http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/s/schopenhauer/arthur/essays/chapter6.html

But we already know your brain is not strong enough to read and decipher these essays, so don't bother. As for getting to know people: by the time I was 18 I had already met and befriended more people than you ever will IN YOUR WHOLE LIFE. Even while 18 I was already traveling abroad alone, having tons of fun with locals, sleeping in their houses, waking up in their countries' jails after drinking a tad too many beers, etc. etc. And I won't even try to communicate my best experiences and feelings, since even if I could do it you would be unable to empathize with any of them. And you dare compare your pathetic life experiences with mine, lol. The fact that you spend half your day reading this shitty forum and trolling random strangers on the internet is proof positive that your life is extremely boring. When I'm on the internet I'm MAKING THEORY. You, on the other hand, are merely "making friends" or "loling xD" or god knows what else you do with people you'll never meet face to face (besides webcams, these don't count). I mean, how much more should I say to make you see that you are not as great as you think you do? Does anyone even remember any of your 2000 posts in this forum? Compare that to me, in which every post I make is like a nuke has just been dropped in here. Etc. Etc.

But hey, you got postcards from all continents, you are cool as fuck.

 

This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.