You honestly don't see any other option between "no other race is superior to the other" and "everyone's equal", don't you pal.
I already told you that once you admit there are no two equal things, order of rank follows immediately. It's not my fault you never learned to read properly. If you cannot see why this is as is, it's your problem. It's beyond my powers to explain to you these trivial things. Also, you are perverting logic the way you compare a human being to a virus. Just because viruses kill human beings, it does not mean they are more powerful. The criteria for power is not ONLY "who kills who" (even though this helps when comparing two similar objects, like surprise surprise lions and tigers, or blacks and whites) but more specifically PROPERLY COORDINATED COMPLEXITY. And what you are doing is taking a fucking VIRUS which is an object placed an enormous order of magnitude of complexity BELLOW that of a human being, and declaring it superior to the latter. You show up with a virus that kills millions of people and fancy you "proved me wrong" -- except your comparison IS EXTREMELY STUPID, since healthy human beings are OBVIOUSLY much more COMPLEX and PROPERLY COORDINATED than a shitty virus. Perhaps this quote will help you:
Nietzsche: "My general view.— First proposition: man as a species is not progressing. Higher types are indeed attained, but they do not last. The level of the species is not raised.
Second proposition: man as a species does not represent any progress compared with any other animal. The whole animal and vegetable kingdom does not evolve from the lower to the higher — but all at the same time, in utter disorder, over and against each other. The richest and most complex forms — for the expression "higher type" means no more than this — perish more easily: only the lowest preserve an apparent indestructibility. The former are achieved only rarely and maintain their superiority with difficulty; the latter are favored by a compromising fruitfulness.
Among men, too, the higher types, the lucky strokes of evolution, perish most easily as fortunes change. They are exposed to every kind of decadence: they are extreme, and that almost means decadents.
The brief spell of beauty, of genius, of Ceasar, is sui generis: such things are not inherited. The type is hereditary; a type is nothing extreme, no "lucky stroke"—
This is not due to any special fatality or malevolence of nature, but simply to the concept "higher nature": the higher type represents an incomparably greater complexity — a greater sum of co-ordinating elements: so its disintegration is also incomparably more likely. The "genius" is the sublimest machine there is — consequently the most fragile."
"But how can the most powerful being be simultaneously the most fragile?" you will, no doubt, wonder. Too bad I don't feel like explaining why (since even if I did you would so clearly lack the brains to understand me anyway).
Everything you say points to you being a socially awkward bookworm who has never actually got out there to know people and feel the pulse of life.
I am sure you know everything about "social awkwardness" and "bookworms".
I've been on every continent, met, befriended, hated and fucked people from all races.
And this is why I know you are beyond hope. Because if even with all these experiences you still fail so much at thinking, there's simply no way to make you smarter. Though I'm sure your "experiences" are pathetic next to mine, if that's what you're wondering. I mean, how else would you remain so naive, idealistic and so full of "good intentions" after being on "every continent". Perhaps you're the kind of "traveler" that goes to another country on the weekend to take some pictures, buy some postcards and who then happily returns to his little slave life of 9 to 5 jobs? I.e. perhaps you're a tourist. Because I don't want to believe a true traveler would be as stupid as you (though this guy (http://www.wanderingearl.com/) is indeed kind of stupid despite his amazing repertoire of experiences).
But you're probably not going to do that, you'll just sit there reading books of other deluded reclusive nerds like you who got lost in distorted ideas of how the world and people are, instead of actually getting to know them.
One of the reasons I'm so good at thinking is actually the fact that I BARELY READ ANY BOOKS. I only read philosophy books (—because I need to) and the occasional biographies or history books. Schopenhauer has already explained why reading too much is not a good idea:
http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/s/schopenhauer/arthur/essays/chapter3.html
http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/s/schopenhauer/arthur/essays/chapter6.html
But we already know your brain is not strong enough to read and decipher these essays, so don't bother. As for getting to know people: by the time I was 18 I had already met and befriended more people than you ever will IN YOUR WHOLE LIFE. Even while 18 I was already traveling abroad alone, having tons of fun with locals, sleeping in their houses, waking up in their countries' jails after drinking a tad too many beers, etc. etc. And I won't even try to communicate my best experiences and feelings, since even if I could do it you would be unable to empathize with any of them. And you dare compare your pathetic life experiences with mine, lol. The fact that you spend half your day reading this shitty forum and trolling random strangers on the internet is proof positive that your life is extremely boring. When I'm on the internet I'm MAKING THEORY. You, on the other hand, are merely "making friends" or "loling xD" or god knows what else you do with people you'll never meet face to face (besides webcams, these don't count). I mean, how much more should I say to make you see that you are not as great as you think you do? Does anyone even remember any of your 2000 posts in this forum? Compare that to me, in which every post I make is like a nuke has just been dropped in here. Etc. Etc.
But hey, you got postcards from all continents, you are cool as fuck.