Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
Posts: 2829
Little Archer

You're brave. 

Posts: 2
Little Archer

I'll definitely pay you a visit from time to time.

I wish you the very best of luck with your project.

Posts: 3246
Little Archer

.

Posts: 7
Little Archer

^ Those other two posters are imposters. I'm the real Allan Zed, don't get fooled by fakes. 

And yes, I am pleased with PsychForums' current design scheme. 

Posts: 3246
Little Archer

.

Posts: 3
Little Archer

It's okay if you don't understand why it's wrong. That is part of this disorder. Normal people would understand why it's wrong.

Posts: 11
Little Archer

Don't believe the other three they are all impostors.

 

There is only one Zedd.

 

Posts: 11
Little Archer

 

by Allan Zedd 

There is only one Zed.

 

 Indeed. And that's me. Not you, impostor.

Posts: 2829
Little Archer

Way to set me up, I'm not falling for that. I just got unmuted.

Posts: 135
Little Archer

lulz

Also:

It's okay if you don't understand why it's wrong. That is part of this disorder. Normal people would understand why it's wrong.

So cute. :)

Tryptamine: I take it you're MLZX or whatever it is your name was, right? Yeah I saw your latest post and liked it, but I think you should read my posts again and think about them a bit more. I'll be repeating myself a bit. I still believe the affective/cognitive empathy duality is useless and does not correspond to anything real. What the neuroscientists observe in their scans are not "proof" of affective empathy, that's what I mean. 

I also realized after your posts that I was interpreting the affective/cognitive duality from the wrong perspective (as in, I switched the subject with object). I don't really remember now how that discussion was exactly going, and I don't have patience to go check it out now, since I've already spent some hours in here debunking the racism debacle. Perhaps another day I'll get back to it, and maybe you can convince me of having been wrong (which is possible, but I currently doubt it lol -- the fact that you repeatedly mention "empirical evidence" as if that was some sort of "proof" that the theories you mention were correct, is telling me you aren't getting where I'm going). 

This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.