Sociopath Community

Did you just try to appear smarter by using science on a scientificlyimpossible idea

Where's the fun in killing a baby?

did you just use a linear thought process to defend the use of a previous linear thought process ... of fucking course you did!

Thrill I mean no offence by this...

You say that you feel bored most of the time, and that it takes a lot more than your average person to feel excitement. My question is why do you do less than the average person in terms of finding stimulation and risk-taking. Yes I know you're a druggie, but that's not a real stimulation. When it comes down to it, you sit at home everyday, yes mostly looking after/teaching your daughter (commendable), but the rest of the time you are here. Which in literal terms mean you're sat on your ass all day staring at a PC screen. - this is the reason I find it hard to believe you're as much of a psycho as you make out. From what I know of psychopathy, this feeling of boredom drives them more than any health risks or offspring responsibilities. You say you don't want to work, and instead want to look after your kid and homeschool. You clearly weren't looking for stimulation and taking risks when you made that decision. Why would you not choose to go to work while she goes to school. The business world is a place where you can find relief from your boredom by taking risks, to get excited and stimulated. But you choose not to do this, why? 

And as for the thread topic, it's interesting. I pondered it a little while I watched the show on t.v. when it was first aired here. I like you wouldn't kill the baby either, but mostly because I don't care rather than for my empathy towards it.... I think the test is rather stupid tbh. It's the whole 6 of one, and half a dozen of the other scenario. - You could say, if you kill the kid you have empathy for the masses that get killed, and if you don't kill the kid you have empathy for the kid. Or the opposite of either statement. When in reality some people don't care. You can make statistics, especially ones like these surrounding PD's say whatever you want them to say. 

Limes, are you offering tk a job? :)

by trololol2

You say that you feel bored most of the time, and that it takes a lot more than your average person to feel excitement. My question is why do you do less than the average person in terms of finding stimulation and risk-taking.

 I do less than the average person in regard to risk-taking? lol

How did you come to that conclusion when you have absolutely no idea what I do when I'm not on here. I'm off here for hours at a time and not just sleeping or home schooling my daughter. What I do is my damn business.

Maybe you should consider minding your own.

by trololol2

I think the test is rather stupid tbh. It's the whole 6 of one, and half a dozen of the other scenario. - You could say, if you kill the kid you have empathy for the masses that get killed, and if you don't kill the kid you have empathy for the kid. Or the opposite of either statement. When in reality some people don't care. You can make statistics, especially ones like these surrounding PD's say whatever you want them to say.

I agree with you. The test was stupid.

I wouldn't kill the baby because I simply don't care about it's existence. I don't give two shits that it's going to grow up to be Hitler or anyone else for that matter. Without the opportunity to explain that though, the actions (or lack there of) could easily be misinterpreted.

I guess that means there's no Israel.

But Hitler and the Nazis actually helped bring Israel into existence. The Zionists actually made a deal with the Nazis. They didn't like East European Jews and were willing to let them be exterminated as long as West European and especially German Jews would be saved.

I don't think I would kill this baby but I would kill a baby that promised to grow into Ronald Reagan.

That's what I meant. I killed the baby so rip Israel. Most likely no nuclear weapons either, or space travel since the US hasn't had a reason to break isolationism and colonize the world with capitalism to keep its post WWII superpower status yet. So anything that happened as a result of cold war competition is gone. Eastern Europe is probably all communist. Computers probably suck if they exist at all.

Killing Hitler killed the internet ): But on the bright side 9/11 never happened because pre-Hitler America wouldn't have been so obsessive about messing with the middle east. Or rather, if it did happen, it would have happened to the Soviets. But without the US selling religious extremism in Afghanistan in the 1980s to mess with the Soviets the middle east would probably be a lot more secular.

I'd follow the baby, wait till it is older and kill it for fun, when it misbehaves.