Such a smartass, aren't you.
by clownpenisThat's one way of looking at it. Rape is the same sort of deal isn't it? Domination. An act of power not a sexual one.
Yes, rape is also about power too I suppose. Though, to me, rape is more about degradation and humiliation. It's a way to destroy them inside and out.
A lot of serial killers were rapists who disposed of their cum-soaked trash in a plethora of ways.
Yep, it's all just trash in the end.
Rape would be more about sex to me.
It's funny how they kill their rape victims afterwards, to cover up what act they committed when murder carries worse punishment.
I don't often recommend books but I think you would definitely enjoy The Gates of Janus by Ian Brady. He is a very intelligent author. He could have very well been a political pundit or philosopher in a different lifetime.
by wilfulJust a theory of mine: your overall post count is relative to the contents of your bank account; the more posts one has the more time not working equals less fucking money....
You have the highest post count...hmmm
I'd personally take it a step further and apply some basic math to it to figure out an average of posts per day. Lets take myself and TK, two posters who don't have puppets. I just need the post count and the day they began really posting: Post / Time Here = Posts per day. The forum was founded in July if I am not mistaken, so we only need how many days are in each month from then to now (Jul: 31 Aug: 31 Sep: 30 Oct: 31 Nov: 30 Dec: 31).
Turncoat: 1830 / 128 = 14.296875 (roughly 14 posts per day).
Thrill Kill: 3783 / 85 = 44.5058823529 (44 to 45 posts per day).
Note: Thrill Kill's sign up date says July 14th, but she only really began posting in September 9th with only two posts prior to it that simply announced her presence.
Of course, all this math means nothing since some people use puppets or spam. With this setup, one long post filled with content from research is of the same weight as someone posting "Pfffffft", or a youtube video, or responding to multiple people in a single post. If we went as far as letter count, we could at least measure the effort, but even that is offset by copy/paste and images/links.
Funny how people on here get so caught up in the emotions.. people are so complicated anger is about as a weak emotion as empathy. agressive actions can get you sent to jail and thats not something people want. if i were you id go around it a sneaky way. Guns, knives, and slashing tires? Way too messy and way to easy to get caught. Either get your money back in a way such as stealing something of equal value from him and pawning it. make your money back through him or something. May not be as violent but, is violent really the most effective way to complete this action?
by clownpenis
It's funny how they kill their rape victims afterwards, to cover up what act they committed when murder carries worse punishment.
^ CP pointed out similar ^ it's not about logical consequences, but exerting one's will, like death before dishonor.
I've also argued "how is the death penalty a deterrent," when so many MORE cases of killing happen to try to "cover up for crimes." The act or consequence of punishment doesn't deter people who don't care anyway.
While most people who do care are deterred for "other reasons" besides the legal consequences and punishment.
I prefer means of "restorative justice" where the consequences of restitution are proportional to the wrong committed. So there would be incentive to reduce the amount of damages done in order to reduce the corrections. The longer you go without reporting and resolving a violation would carry greater penalty rather than addressing it immediately. People should be rewarded for taking responsibility by restoring their rights, or lose them otherwise.