Enjoys the sensation, and "accidentally" ruins your top with a small slice in it .
Edit: Ooops.
by smkovalinsky
by anastaciaYes. I'm a sociopath. How did you ever guess? This is why I'm referred to as a squishy empath in multiple threads. I can just see through bullshit. It doesn't take a sociopath to do that.
You act as though I am trying to pass something off here. All I have been is honest: About my feelings about the author, about my hopes that she runs into trouble for certain ethical considerations, about my own philosophy of morality, and about my general belief that sociopaths are con-artists - not born different any more than gays are. Its all a con to get social equality, and I hope it will be blocked. Moral laziness should not be upheld as an ideal Where is the bullshit? What am I pretending?
Did I read this correctly? Are you really saying that gays are "not born different" and it's just a con to get social equality? And you want it blocked? Or did you just mean this bigotted statement to apply to sociopaths. Of course, if we both chose our "lifestyle" of "moral laziness," then both groups, gays and sociopaths, are "morally lazy.
But you admit you are lazy too as far as getting off drugs. This stuff you are on is just "too hard" to detox from. Well, I got off methadone. That's considered pretty damned hard to get off of so maybe you shouldn't be putting on airs of superiority that you are so damned strong.
I wonder why you have come here to pick a fight with sociopaths. What is the point?
by free_behind_my_mask
by smkovalinsky
by anastaciaYes. I'm a sociopath. How did you ever guess? This is why I'm referred to as a squishy empath in multiple threads. I can just see through bullshit. It doesn't take a sociopath to do that.
You act as though I am trying to pass something off here. All I have been is honest: About my feelings about the author, about my hopes that she runs into trouble for certain ethical considerations, about my own philosophy of morality, and about my general belief that sociopaths are con-artists - not born different any more than gays are. Its all a con to get social equality, and I hope it will be blocked. Moral laziness should not be upheld as an ideal Where is the bullshit? What am I pretending?
Did I read this correctly? Are you really saying that gays are "not born different" and it's just a con to get social equality? And you want it blocked? Or did you just mean this bigotted statement to apply to sociopaths. Of course, if we both chose our "lifestyle" of "moral laziness," then both groups, gays and sociopaths, are "morally lazy.
But you admit you are lazy too as far as getting off drugs. This stuff you are on is just "too hard" to detox from. Well, I got off methadone. That's considered pretty damned hard to get off of so maybe you shouldn't be putting on airs of superiority that you are so damned strong.
I wonder why you have come here to pick a fight with sociopaths. What is the point?
You're right on all counts . I was just being an idiot, I was very hyper and not doing well. Sorry. And no, I do not hold either gays or neuro-atypicals responsible for how they were born. We all have to deal as best we can with our biological and genetic wiring.
As members of the same species at the same period in history with only slightly different genes and environment this miraculously constitutes evolutionary superiority and inferiority? How superior, then, is a Manhattanite when compared to a San from the Kalihari? Both genes and environment are enormously different as compared to a Manhattanite empath and a Manhattanite sociopath. Your argument is rubbish, do some more thinking.
Evolution is not a straight line, loser. Just because something is better does not make it more evolved, that is merely a way to view oneself as superior over others. We cannot say we are more evolved than apes becuase they have done evolving of their own while we were evolving...
Tl;dr - evolution is not as simple as you think