She was quite the laughing stock for a while after that.
When she was on dr Phil I thought of her as insecure. The radio interview brought out a somewhat nervous person. I find this quite amazing if she is really used to speaking in public. Nothing she said seemed to ring true.
I don't think she faked it, I think she really is like a frightened deer.
That doesn't mean she is a good person hellbent on making people's lives better..... I'm pretty sure she indeed is a freak. But with that, an aura of confidence obviously doesn't have to occur.
People who startle and flinch might still be bad people, sociopaths.... nope.
Lol. I'd be surprised if anyone took your petty "release" as serious. If you want someone to pay attention to you, try illuminating factors other than how old they look or whether or not they are attractive. From now on this release will be linked with your name. Anytime you apply for a job or try to further your own career and are researched, this piece will show up. That's just embarrassing. Your desire to harm her in some professional way likely backfired because you just look unprofessional and catty. Congratulations.
by anastaciaLol. I'd be surprised if anyone took your petty "release" as serious. If you want someone to pay attention to you, try illuminating factors other than how old they look or whether or not they are attractive. From now on this release will be linked with your name. Anytime you apply for a job or try to further your own career and are researched, this piece will show up. That's just embarrassing. Your desire to harm her in some professional way likely backfired because you just look unprofessional and catty. Congratulations.
Oh, gee, I have been a professional writer for 20 years, and I really didn't know that my name would be linked with this. Thank you for informing me of that! And I don't agree with you. I don't need to worry about furthering my career. I am financially independent, and I have done good work and been lauded by attorneys and authors who are far more noble and much more noteable than Lund. In any case, the piece is not petty. No one who read it would find it so. I stand by it. Incidentally, my favorite NYC editor and a professor colleague of mine both emailed me in praise of the piece. They loved it.
by SensitiveSoulWhen she was on dr Phil I thought of her as insecure. The radio interview brought out a somewhat nervous person. I find this quite amazing if she is really used to speaking in public. Nothing she said seemed to ring true.
I don't think she faked it, I think she really is like a frightened deer.
That doesn't mean she is a good person hellbent on making people's lives better..... I'm pretty sure she indeed is a freak. But with that, an aura of confidence obviously doesn't have to occur.
People who startle and flinch might still be bad people, sociopaths.... nope.
Bingo You are shrewd. She is posing as a sociopath.
by Buttered ToastAna's got a point.
No, she does not. There is nothing petty about the piece, and I am financially independent and not going to ever work again so it is nothing to me. I am proud of my former writing for past clients, and have always been praised by authors and attorneys who matter. I would never flinch from anything I said in this piece. I stand by it all. As I told the genius ana, I have already received praise on the piece by the 2 people who matter most to me: My NYC editor, and a professor colleague from WPU.
What's funny is that instead of outting M.E. you outted yourself as someone unable to write a decent investigative piece without turning it into the equivilent of a highschool facebook argument.
If you were the outstanding author you claim to be you wouldn't feel the need to defend yourself. You wouldn't have needed to come on here, construct some ellaborate ruse then self publish a release. Yes, self publish, because that site just takes releases from anywhere if they're submitted. If you were truly praised by people who matter you wouldn't have to be taking this sad route. :(
Any further comment to or about you is a waste of time.
by anastaciaWhat's funny is that instead of outting M.E. you outted yourself as someone unable to write a decent investigative piece without turning it into the equivilent of a highschool facebook argument.
If you were the outstanding author you claim to be you wouldn't feel the need to defend yourself. You wouldn't have needed to come on here, construct some ellaborate ruse then self publish a release. Yes, self publish, because that site just takes releases from anywhere if they're submitted. If you were truly praised by people who matter you wouldn't have to be taking this sad route. :(
Any further comment to or about you is a waste of time.
Let me see if I can make this clear: I don't answer to you, and you do not define what I can say or not say. Of course if I wasn't being paid by a client I would post for a free Google SEO. I am with a media firm and it says as much on the release. I would not waste money posting what I did about Lund-- it still goes to Google seo. You are the one who is a waste of time. I certainly would never defend myself to you, and you do not dictate when or what I am allowed to speak out on. I have done top press for Anthony Peake and Jay Paul Deratany among others, who are worth 50 of Lund. I post because I want to talk about her, and you can't stop me. My writing is mine to do as I see fit with---- while Your opinion is a waste of time.
Alright, well, I don't question your moxie. Of course, by shallow examination, some of the assumptions made would carry more weight than it deserves. (I mean reactions of readers.) It is always a matter of finding the respect from those that earn it from you, but I'm not questioning your integrity or quality of friends and colleagues. I'm more detailing the fact human nature being what it is, it may turn into a tangle. I am being highly paranoid, but...I just wanted to be sure you were solid on doing what you wanted and aware, I guess. I still would love for M.E. to make a response of some kind. Baiting or not, who can resist witnessing a successful venture?
With that, I'm just going to sit back. I don't feel I have the energy to delve into a debate or conflict. I see storm clouds and I'm wondering if it will pass by or pass over.