by Spatial MindYou thought I was done eh ?
Yeah, you just interrupted my victory dance. :\
We're talking about collapsing the wave function there. When we measure, the outcome is different, when we do not measure, the outcome is different yet again. For some, that's proof enough that something on a conscious level is at play. Wouldn't you agree ?
No. The problem is that we can't look at the results without involving consciousness, but that doesn't mean the same thing wouldn't happen if we don't. It's a 'did the tree fall when there's no one there to see it' kind of thing. There are several theories about quantum physics and most do not take consciousness into account.
Well I told you from the start it's something I can't prove to just anyone. In order to see the picture, one must collect the information, set it down on the table without doubt, and assemble all the pieces to see the big picture. Now there you are saying for the 100th time "You can't prove it". Only one who is seeking the answer will see. You're mind is already settled and reliant on some other source to hand feed you information which is not so easily done in this subject. You say the burden of proof is on me. If that's the case, it would indeed be a burden.
This is a bad argument. If you can't put the "evidence" in front of me and let them speak for themselves, I'm going to believe something more probable. You have a theory, but not the most probable theory in my opinion.
At what point did a creature who rose from the swamp start to mate and give birth, then raise offspring ? Cause before that, these creatures were not giving birth, nor would they have ever been an infant. For mamals in particular, the young will not make it without care.
The change is gradual, not flipped on like a switch. There's no exact point when species mutate; it is something that happens slowly over time.
It is a scientific delema, where some argue a mutation must have taken place from some creature simular to the bird. It's still a laughable thing.
If cell splitting happened little by little, then how would the creature progress without giving birth ? Were there creatures that mutated and lived for 250,000 years ?
Why is it a laughable thing?
Cells split and over time become more complex, so complex that they cannot simply 'split' any longer and the need for a more advanced reproduction system emerges. Simple.
Regardless, science cannot explain everything and it never claims it can. If a more probable theory appears science is going to adopt that one instead. This is how it works.