When you are breaking down someone, are you aware of what you are doing at that time? Or is it more of an afterthought? For the sake of conversation lets assume there is no "master plan." How do you restrict yourself? Is it based on a pattern or response from the individual? An example for clarification: how does one know when to put on the brakes if he doesnt know if he's speeding?
Let's say we take the default definition of empathy from Wikipedia. Based on your second comment does this mean you are unaware of emotions of another individual or that you are aware and disregard it as something that doesn't factor into the equation? We could factor screw turning into the previous question and I'd like to also be blunt and not assume anything.
The sharks might smell this but, I believe I'm very observant when it comes to emotions. The limiting factor here is that they require face to face interaction. I am fully aware of the agreed upon "weight" given to actions and responses but they play no part in the decision making process. For example:
John is making a decision on whether or not to cheat on Mary. If he does, this is morally "wrong." According to the world, the "wrong" is rated at "5." John is fully aware that the world believes this "wrong" is rated a 5 but for John, it's not rated 0. It doesn't even exist on the equation.
Maybe this "choice" doesn't make me a sociopath, maybe the "awareness" doesn't make me a sociopath, all I know is that when looking at a decision, weighing the pros and cons, the "wrong" plays no part in it.
Lastly, the response to poutine was intended to remove that thread from the conversation. I agree that it did come out a bit glamorized and I will admit that after reading it over I come off sounding like a 15 year old emo kid for which I apologize. The responses have been very interesting to read and the intention was to solicit further information without the other thread polluting it.
The thread was created to test the waters. I have perceptions of the people in this forum, both good and bad, just like everyone else. I created the thread to expedite my understanding of the different personas. I was curious to see who is eager to "prove themselves." I assumed that no one would share anything unless I wrote something first. The story of ruin was purposely light. I wanted to "feel out" the level of trust or perceived trust that the members are willing to give. I was also able to better understand what the responding members want other members to believe is a "heavy" story. In reality it may not actually be a heavy story, or a true story, but the level of story posted now has a baseline. "If you do this kind of thing in this story, this is considered a 10."
Others who didn't reply I have several guesses including: (1) they saw right through it, (2) they didn't care, and/or (3) they were right about to until it was killed. This does not mean that people who posted are better or worse than people who didn't. All it means is at that specific time of the post, on that specific day, this is how that individual responds to a question like this.
This may come out wrong but I'm still teetering on what the purpose of the board is for myself. Do I write some heavy ideas in here and look for genuine feedback from others that may or may not be like myself? Do I use it as a source of entertainment, a place to conjure up an online persona and expend my energy maintaining it? What is the baseline response of this forum? What is the community like? Is this primarily a "Call of Duty" channel on Xbox, or /r/suicidewatch. (those who are unfamiliar, /r/suicidewatch is taken very seriously).
Curious as to where I am at now? What I perceive this board to be? It's a mixture of personalities and conversations. One thread might be talking about the above, while another might be showing pictures of someone shitting themselves. The answer is it's a process, it's something to figure out. There is no black and white "this is where the screw fits."
I'll put myself out there (let the sharks circle) and say I can only speak for myself. Maybe I'm not a sociopath? Maybe I'm not anything? The only thing I know is that I've done some things, had some thoughts, and know that sharing these things might not be acceptible.