Sociopath Community

user22212 said: 

natasha87 said: 

user22212 said: 

Sugar's the type to walk into McDonald's, throw the coke she orders at a wall then demand to speak to the manager about how employees are not allowed to fiddle with the plastic straw, which they did when they picked up the cup.

 

The edit TC did there was funny, an artistic expression of modding. To say it's abuse only a pretext, a technicality.

 

He should've removed the doxx if it was requested. So that was bad, but more down the lane of neglect. The other mods are equally responsible for that incident because they're mods too.

He could've simply forgot to delete the quoted part.

 

I don't think TC should be demoded. If he's to be demoded, it would be for neglect. He's not the only mod tho. Not having TC as a mod would make that neglect you complained about baseline, compared to just an isolated incident.

 user's the type to come to a forum and having been there 5 minutes think he understands the dynamic, and then try to hard to have a say in things he knows nothing about. this is like strike 5 for tc, and the pattern he demonstrates is always making things personal. he refuses to remove the doxxes of people he doosnt likes, and pink is the most obvious example.

this bish got doxxed, people were sending shit to her house, and because the girl that was currently fucking tc in the ass didn't like pink, tc not only didn't remove her dox, posted all her private DMs where she's literally begging him to remove it but then went ahead and called her house phone (supposedly to 'check it was her dox') and then told us all about the convo with her dad and how he heard her in the background acting sheepish.

if he wasn't a mod that shit would be funny, but he is so it isn't ok. he wouldn't like it if i called his fatass mom and told her i know she raped him as a kid would he?

 

I understand the dynamic very well, it's simple:

You do not like TC and want him demoded, and are willing to pull any sort of argument out of thin air to get it done.

 

Tc is a good mod in general, we have more than just TC as mods, why did nobody else remove those doxxes? Overall, TC's mod performance is good and he should stay a mod because of it. This alleged wilful neglect stuff, can be turned against any other mod as well, because they neglected it too, making them not better than tc in that regard.

 Can I just tell you I la u. Haha

(i felt particularly moved by how u said that user)

 

 Can I just tell you I la u. Haha

(i felt particularly moved by how u said that user)

 
I have no idea what you're talking about. No you can't tell me that.

user22212 said: 

natasha87 said: 

user22212 said: 

Sugar's the type to walk into McDonald's, throw the coke she orders at a wall then demand to speak to the manager about how employees are not allowed to fiddle with the plastic straw, which they did when they picked up the cup.

 

The edit TC did there was funny, an artistic expression of modding. To say it's abuse only a pretext, a technicality.

 

He should've removed the doxx if it was requested. So that was bad, but more down the lane of neglect. The other mods are equally responsible for that incident because they're mods too.

He could've simply forgot to delete the quoted part.

 

I don't think TC should be demoded. If he's to be demoded, it would be for neglect. He's not the only mod tho. Not having TC as a mod would make that neglect you complained about baseline, compared to just an isolated incident.

 user's the type to come to a forum and having been there 5 minutes think he understands the dynamic, and then try to hard to have a say in things he knows nothing about. this is like strike 5 for tc, and the pattern he demonstrates is always making things personal. he refuses to remove the doxxes of people he doosnt likes, and pink is the most obvious example.

this bish got doxxed, people were sending shit to her house, and because the girl that was currently fucking tc in the ass didn't like pink, tc not only didn't remove her dox, posted all her private DMs where she's literally begging him to remove it but then went ahead and called her house phone (supposedly to 'check it was her dox') and then told us all about the convo with her dad and how he heard her in the background acting sheepish.

if he wasn't a mod that shit would be funny, but he is so it isn't ok. he wouldn't like it if i called his fatass mom and told her i know she raped him as a kid would he?

 

I understand the dynamic very well, it's simple:

You do not like TC and want him demoded, and are willing to pull any sort of argument out of thin air to get it done.

 

Tc is a good mod in general, we have more than just TC as mods, why did nobody else remove those doxxes? Overall, TC's mod performance is good and he should stay a mod because of it. This alleged wilful neglect stuff, can be turned against any other mod as well, because they neglected it too, making them not better than tc in that regard.

 

Edit: Don't get me wrong. I don't think he's acted well or fair play in those situations. I'm just saying he's one of the best suited people to have mod, that does a lot of work for the community. The benefits of having TC as mod vastly outweigh the costs. Because the costs are NONE. A mod refusing to do mod-work, is the same as a mod not having mod at all. Having tc as mod has autistic spam and cp removed quicker and improves the usability of the site. That alone is enough to have him be a mod. Let's find a more impartial doxx-remover than TC, and mod that person too, who gives a crap as long as what needs to be done is done.

 they did remove them my sweet retard. that's the whole point. he wouldnt remove med's dox because he doosnt likes her. so either tony inq or meta had to do it. and the pink thing, he was the only mod at the time, so the shit stayed up for a while. maybe forever? i'm saying inq and tony are more impartial, that's always been my point. and as much as i like both of them, if they ever behaved like tc has i wouldn't think they were suited to be mod.

i obviously don't expect tc to be demodded over the recent stuff, esp if he wasnt demodded when he refused to take down meds stuff, i'm making a point that it needs to stop. if someone isn't around that's one thing. but to intentionally pick and choose what info to remove is biased.

i can't believe you actually think you know my motivations for doing anything, you're the same idiot who actually buys blancs OD bullshit and wastes time giving her advice lmao

user22212 said: 

 

 Can I just tell you I la u. Haha

(i felt particularly moved by how u said that user)

 
I have no idea what you're talking about. No you can't tell me that.

 It was a joke, jesus. I just liked how you phrased that.

user22212 said: 

Edit: Don't get me wrong. I don't think he's acted well or fair play in those situations. 

What'd I do wrong by your accounts User? 

Let's find a more impartial doxx-remover than TC

What examples are you going with here, Sug's? 

I've stuck to our original dox policy, she just can't seem to understand how it works even when Alena's outright narrating it. 

Turncoat said: 

user22212 said: 

Edit: Don't get me wrong. I don't think he's acted well or fair play in those situations. 

What'd I do wrong by your accounts User? 

I was trying to de-escalate by conceding some points to sugar and have her at least see my point as to why, even accepting what she faults you for, you'd still make a good mod. She proceeded to call me a retard tho :^(.

You being online and not removing the doxx while asked and partaking in the drama is something that can be considered unprofessional as a mod. But I don't know what "doxx" means. When, if at all, you were asked to remove it, and how fast did you act upon that. 

Furthermore, I believe it's part of SC culture to at least let the drama caused by a doxxing unfold for a while before the said doxxing is removed.

user22212 said: 

Turncoat said: 

user22212 said: 

Edit: Don't get me wrong. I don't think he's acted well or fair play in those situations. 

What'd I do wrong by your accounts User? 

I was trying to de-escalate by conceding some points to sugar and have her at least see my point as to why, even accepting what she faults you for, you'd still make a good mod. She proceeded to call me a retard tho :^(.

 

You being online and not removing the doxx while asked and partaking in the drama is something that can be considered unprofessional as a mod. But I don't know what "doxx" means. When, if at all, you were asked to remove it, and how fast did you act upon that. 

 

Furthermore, I believe it's part of SC culture to at least let the drama caused by a doxxing unfold for a while before the said doxxing is removed.

 yes, this is his life. he literally lives for sc, so he should behave as such. last time he got demodded he was damn near suicidal, i had his gf lecturing me that my troll got him fired lmao. also yea if we're gonna let drama unfold fair enough, but outright refusing, and refusing based on personal grudges? sc was not built on that kind of bitchass behavior

user22212 said: 

Turncoat said: 

user22212 said: 

Edit: Don't get me wrong. I don't think he's acted well or fair play in those situations. 

What'd I do wrong by your accounts User? 

I was trying to de-escalate by conceding some points to sugar and have her at least see my point as to why, even accepting what she faults you for, you'd still make a good mod. She proceeded to call me a retard tho :^(.

You being online and not removing the doxx while asked and partaking in the drama is something that can be considered unprofessional as a mod. But I don't know what "doxx" means. When, if at all, you were asked to remove it, and how fast did you act upon that. 

Do you remember our old dox policy? 

It fit within the parameters to not be taken down, namely that Med had posted herself on this website and the photos following from others did not escalate any further than how identifiable she'd made herself first. We'd been taking down Med photos on and off for years here at SC simply over how she'd not put herself directly on the website (just PM proliferation), and her finally doing it was a nail in the coffin. 

The supposed "Alena and Med wanted it down" situation was Sugar doing a bullying form of diplomacy only to later see that Alena couldn't edit her photo upload of Med out of a post from it making it past the edit timer. Seeing as it wasn't by our older policy of SC even a dox, it was just them asking me to change a non-dox post without any rules backing it, and I make a point of not taking down any posts that don't go against any rules for the sake of forum purity. 

Alena and I were talking during Sug's weird "womyn are weak and need to stick together" attempt at forming a 'feminist' bandwagon, and largely she was just tired of Sugar complaining so much to the point of cowing to her demands. She if anything seemed relieved, and even reversed her decision as the conversation escalated, and now this far along both of them are together again in their witnessing the trainwreck that is Med. 

To give you an idea, this is enough to be called a "dox" to ol' Sug: 



So in the end, this was just a power move to Sugar, and she thinks in that battle that she lost. If she can't use it as a means to "take me down" after the fact, then she has to face this idea in her head of having lost a game of tug of war where her opponent wasn't even playing. She'd even tried to hand my dox to Med as some means of evening the score only to see nothing come of it. 

Furthermore, I believe it's part of SC culture to at least let the drama caused by a doxxing unfold for a while before the said doxxing is removed.

It'd been dependent on if the person in question wanted it down, and if it'd passed the bar of how much they've shown of themselves or not. 

Turncoat said: 

user22212 said: 

Turncoat said: 

user22212 said: 

Edit: Don't get me wrong. I don't think he's acted well or fair play in those situations. 

What'd I do wrong by your accounts User? 

I was trying to de-escalate by conceding some points to sugar and have her at least see my point as to why, even accepting what she faults you for, you'd still make a good mod. She proceeded to call me a retard tho :^(.

You being online and not removing the doxx while asked and partaking in the drama is something that can be considered unprofessional as a mod. But I don't know what "doxx" means. When, if at all, you were asked to remove it, and how fast did you act upon that. 

Do you remember our old dox policy? 

It fit within the parameters to not be taken down, namely that Med had posted herself on this website and the photos following from others did not escalate any further than how identifiable she'd made herself first. We'd been taking down Med photos on and off for years here at SC simply over how she'd not put herself directly on the website (just PM proliferation), and her finally doing it was a nail in the coffin. 

The supposed "Alena and Med wanted it down" situation was Sugar doing a bullying form of diplomacy only to later see that Alena couldn't edit her photo upload of Med out of a post from it making it past the edit timer. Seeing as it wasn't by our older policy of SC even a dox, it was just them asking me to change a non-dox post without any rules backing it, and I make a point of not taking down any posts that don't go against any rules for the sake of forum purity. 

Alena and I were talking during Sug's weird "womyn are weak and need to stick together" attempt at forming a 'feminist' bandwagon, and largely she was just tired of Sugar complaining so much to the point of cowing to her demands. She if anything seemed relieved, and even reversed her decision as the conversation escalated, and now this far along both of them are together again in their witnessing the trainwreck that is Med. 

To give you an idea, this is enough to be called a "dox" to ol' Sug: 



So in the end, this was just a power move to Sugar, and she thinks in that battle that she lost. If she can't use it as a means to "take me down" after the fact, then she has to face this idea in her head of having lost a game of tug of war where her opponent wasn't even playing. She'd even tried to hand my dox to Med as some means of evening the score only to see nothing come of it. 

Furthermore, I believe it's part of SC culture to at least let the drama caused by a doxxing unfold for a while before the said doxxing is removed.

It'd been dependent on if the person in question wanted it down, and if it'd passed the bar of how much they've shown of themselves or not. 

 if that were the case why the fuck was it ultimately deleted? lmao

also are you trying to say lena was complaining about me to you?

also i never said that pic was a dox you liar..so desperate for approval lmao, everyone thinks u were wrong tc and you can't accept it