sorry up for nearly 24 hours now and buzzed on top of it...just realized you probably mean that elon didn't want to steer the conversation too hard when trump got boring. yeah maybe, but a good conversationalist can do it in appropriate ways. when elon tries to do it he starts stuttering a lot and you can hear the impatience in his voice. XD i like the guy but it is what it is
post by the organization that worked on the information:
my gut feeling is that everyone knows something was up with that assassination attempt. i could get into the details like how the secret service was giving this "sloped roof" argument about the most probable building for a sniper to be on, even though the incline was negligible. or how the secret service lied about coverage on a water tower in the area, or how the assassin's mobile data showed him meeting up in areas near an FBI office...that whole situation reeks of a power play, but this one's getting memory holed, and all the relevant information is going to be sealed. i'm pretty sure that elon is a bit naive (given some of the stuff he retweets) and wanted to press the matter, but trump probably cannot discuss any truth on the matter he's aware of
There were numerous average joe shmoe's on the street who could see him, were yelling shit like 'He's Got A Gun!', calling and alerting people, uploading footage to Youtube... and it still got this far.
That's very unusual when it comes to a matter this sensitive.
It's a conspiracy. There is no other explanation really. Even gross incompetence doesn't really fit the bill because it doesn't explain why both the secret service and FBI are stonewalling everykne. They're not releasing any information whatsoever.
Instead, we get heritage foundation releasing findings based on phone geolocation data. They don't even have access to Thomas Crooks phone nor the resources FBI supposedly has, yet they can release mode information than the FBI and secret services combined.
I hope that the citizen investigations reveal what really happened here.
The one thing I think the situation indicates, is that clearly there are things going on behind the scenes—plays and stakes big enough to warrant killing Trump—which we only see the flashpoints of. There is some speculation abound; for example, the other Republicans who could be president are more “bought out”, or are at least legacy politicians.
In one parlor trick, there could have been two candidates totally selected by the organizers with money instead of the semblance of "vox populi" that we have. This election would have been Kamala and Haley.
Haley is of course a military-industrial complex puppet of the highest order; that was where she got her starting money. Kamala's ascendency is more of an unfortunate side-effect of all the campaign money being tied up in the Biden ticket already. Kamala ended up getting being able to acquire the Biden war chest through semantics because she's Biden's VP. And initially the Obamas opposed her, but I think everyone on the left was pleasantly surprised by how much ground she's made. A bit of a digression, but back to to what information we can get about the assassin.
A lot of the JFK stuff had to be waited on for decades before citizens could do Freedom of Information Act requests...and a lot of what is released is struck through with black marker. :) That’s how these people operate. So this is why I'm not optimistic we will get any truth out of this. And the people who orchestrate all of this see us as dumb proles anyways; cattle whose perceptions they have to manage.
It’s also weird to me that this failed assassin was in a Blackrock commercial. But I don’t want to be too Q-tarded about that.
The simplest explanation is always the correct one. In this case, it's that it was an intentional assassination attempt assisted by secret services and the FBI. The alternative requires swallowing so much bullshit, accepting gross incompetence and making excuses for the FBI's and secret services behavior and lies after the incident.
So you think Haley would've stepped up after the assassination attempt? It would be interesting to play out what would've happened if Thomas Matthew Crooks had been successful.
The reason both the FBI and SS are stonewalling the public is very simple. It gives them the same defense as the 5th amendment. If you're a criminal being interrogated, the best thing you can do is stfu so that you don't say something stupid that gets contradicted later on. They're only ever releasing information as it becomes already obvious to the public. The messaging communication became public, so SS fixes their timeline to be consistent with the public narrative. There was a release of photos of snipers aiming in the direction of the assassination building at/slightly before the shooting, so SS now says their "current theory" is that the snipers thought Crooks was a police officer so they didn't shoot. They've already changed the story several times over. If this were a criminal investigation, the changes in the story would've already been damning enough. There hasn't been a single useful fact that was released by SS or FBI that wasn't already derivable from the evidence available to the public.
The public should start hoarding information and release it only the moment that SS and FBI make their final report, just to show how full of shit they are.
So you think Haley would've stepped up after the assassination attempt? It would be interesting to play out what would've happened if Thomas Matthew Crooks had been successful.
100%. She beat out DeSantis when the Republican donors tried to run a counter-Trump candidate. DeSantis was the Republic donor's attempt at MAGA without Trump. Doesn't work, because Trump is a populist, but DeSantis has no charisma. Haley was the most presentable human that the RNC had to offer; that's how sad things have gotten there.
The reason both the FBI and SS are stonewalling the public is very simple. It gives them the same defense as the 5th amendment. If you're a criminal being interrogated, the best thing you can do is stfu so that you don't say something stupid that gets contradicted later on. They're only ever releasing information as it becomes already obvious to the public. The messaging communication became public, so SS fixes their timeline to be consistent with the public narrative. There was a release of photos of snipers aiming in the direction of the assassination building at/slightly before the shooting, so SS now says their "current theory" is that the snipers thought Crooks was a police officer so they didn't shoot. They've already changed the story several times over. If this were a criminal investigation, the changes in the story would've already been damning enough. There hasn't been a single useful fact that was released by SS or FBI that wasn't already derivable from the evidence available to the public.
The public should start hoarding information and release it only the moment that SS and FBI make their final report, just to show how full of shit they are.
You are right, and psyops are also the norm, not the exception in these situations. For example, the conversation on 9/11 would be way different if the average American had all the relevant information on which intelligence agencies were present at Ground Zero, or what was happening with WTC7, etc. But this information is kept opaque, because the interested parties by necessity hide their tracks.