Sociopath Community

There is a turkish adage "A demon will only be beat by the devil himself" Democrats are mad because finally someone more manipulative, more ruthless, more narcissistic and better at PR than them beat them.

It's just lower level narcs screaming that a higher level narc beat them.

If you look at hillary supporters, they have alot of common traits:

• some sort of personality disorder
• manipulative
• entitled
• feminazi
• obsessed with women related topics
• want men put under the boot of women to get revenge for daddy not loving or some shit kek

Bernie:

• people who couldnt succeed in capitalism
• stoners
• people on welfare
• various types of losers

Trump is just a higher IQ machiavellian and they hate that they got beaten.

Spatial Mind said: 

Tryptamine said: 

I'm personally fond of Trump, but I would be careful about idolizing the guy or thinking he's some kind of figure foretold in the Bible. That seems excessive. It also might blind you to some of his failings.

Atheist. You haven't been paying attention to the content. I'm covering what was prophesied years in advance, by a self proclaimed prophet, who died the same month Trump became President elect in 2016, and it actually happened.

- In advance, I waited to see what would really happen with the Supreme Court, waiting for 2 Judges to step down. 2 Judges stepped down.

Amazingly a 3rd Judge died on an election year, and Trump is putting in his 3rd Supreme Justice. Republicans are dominating the Supreme Court as it was said "I wish to place righteousness in the court".

- It also mentioned how the democrats wanted to fill the supreme court to suit their own endeavours. Meanwhile every time Trump fills a seat we see the dems raise a huge fuss with scandals and whatever they can do the stall Trump's progress

- In "2014" it was said they will shout "impeach" And look at the debacle that went on last year.

- In the first video, Kim Clement ( who lived long enough to see Trump win, then died the same month ) Said "This man will emerge in the coming weeks, Then we see Trump emerge into politics a few weeks later.

I think I mentioned God can only work through imperfect people. And no, this is not idolatry, this is actually happening. It so happens that Trump openly suggests he'll drain the swamp, and here we see him gutting corruption out of government like crazy. ( Other day CIA referred FBI's Russian collusion report originated from Hillary. A lot of officials are going down )

.

As for the Bible, with the use of Bible code software they are able to find hidden messages in the Bible.

This one was posted September 20, 2016. Two months before Trump won the election, and it came correct.

starts at 40 seconds.

Another one from 4 years ago.

^ That guy keeps laying them down in advance, like the rest of the subject matter here and it keeps turning up correct when the time passes. Of course his latest one is about Trump's next win.

When self proclaimed divine sources are right over and over again, it's worth looking into. Not everyone will be able to digest this.

The reason I don't get into videos when it comes to this type of conversation is that it creates so much to cover that it's impossible to give a reasonable response. Especially when you're posting 4, 5, 6+ videos. I don't just buy into things, I do my own research. I'm not implying that the videos are bad. Just that I don't watch them because I know what kind of rabbit hole they would be.

To keep things simple, I'm not into thinking our politicians are put in place by divinity. I think that they are a representation of vox populi at any given frame of time. But I think if we stick to the facts, we agree on a lot of things politically. For example, I'm woke to the shit about what the Clintons did, and about how the Obama administration tried to sabotage Trump's campaign. That should not have been a surprise to Democrats after they found out that Bernie's campaign was sabotaged last election.

In the case of the Supreme Court judge, I think Amy Coney Barrett is a good pick. But she's pro-life, so it's gonna be a shitshow trying to get her in. I'm also pretty sure Democrats are planning to pack the courts if they win. Neither Biden nor Harris will give a straight answer as to whether or not they'll do that come Election Day.

Tryptamine said: 

The reason I don't get into videos when it comes to this type of conversation is that it creates so much to cover that it's impossible to give a reasonable response. Especially when you're posting 4, 5, 6+ videos. I don't just buy into things, I do my own research. I'm not implying that the videos are bad. Just that I don't watch them because I know what kind of rabbit hole they would be.

For shame, these kinds of videos are amazing for milking content, and on the off chance they're getting anything right you'd be allowing your own willful ignorance to stop you from learning. There's a lot of things I thought were bullshit before further exploration, and even if they're full of shit you can still learn their arguments for the sake of debate experience. 

You're effectively looking at the speaker through a filter of preconceived archetypal ad hominems as why to not have to take their material seriously overall, and even just watching one or two of his vids is liable to get you closer to Spatial's page. 

MartinLooterKing said: 

There is a turkish adage "A demon will only be beat by the devil himself" Democrats are mad because finally someone more manipulative, more ruthless, more narcissistic and better at PR than them beat them.

It's just lower level narcs screaming that a higher level narc beat them.

I'm pretty sure his passing more anti-abortion laws, enabling fracking practices, doing dubious talks with foreign leaders that no one else can listen in on, and taking wealth away from the little guy's not helping. 

I'm just surprised more people aren't enterprising on Trump's fears right now. 

Tryptamine said: 

AliceInWonderland said:

Trump gets bad coverage near constantly, but the benefit of this is that he gets coverage constantly while Biden barely gets any. Why? Because Trump sells the news while Biden doesn't, that much is obvious. As a Trump can consciously use this to his advantage to get was essentially equates to free Marketing. His statements are, regardless of if you like them or not, always on brand for him; thus running his 'controversial' statements constantly and talking about the things he says or does is merely spreading his brand. 

An example would be Trumps recent use of the word 'Fuck' during a Rush Limbaugh interview. This is a brilliant imo because in doing so, he knowingly dropped bait he knew the press would not be able to resist. The only thing I've hear about pertaining to that interview regardless of who's talking about it is his profane use of 'Fuck'. The key here is the context of the words use, he was making a statement to Iran to not fuck with the United States. Hence, all the media has been doing the past 24 hours is running a story on how hard Trump is on an enemy of the United States. An added bonus is that it distracts from covid. 

This is true, and I'm wondering if the attention and hatred will actually ruin him this election. I don't think Kenosha or Portland may be good samples, but it seems like a lot of people are pissed. Remember that older woman dressed in green that screamed "NOOOOOOO!!!!" when Trump got elected? That is nothing compared to what we're about to see if he gets re-elected. People aren't just divided, they are livid.

It really depends on if people can forgive Biden's pedo smears or not. 

On the note of cursing, I find it an endearing trait. Studies show that honest people are more prone to cursing. Less to hide, I think.

Through it's repetition it demonstrates itself for it's uncreatively, and it demonstrates a lower class mentality. 

Tryptamine said: 

I'm personally fond of Trump, but I would be careful about idolizing the guy or thinking he's some kind of figure foretold in the Bible. That seems excessive. It also might blind you to some of his failings.

I've also been fond of him (more than fond really). I've been following his careers for decades, but he's a terrible choice as president beyond the self-demonstration room to show what 'The Presidency' has become. 

Turncoat said:

Through it's repetition it demonstrates itself for it's uncreatively, and it demonstrates a lower class mentality.

There is an amount between reasonable and excessive. I employ foul language fairly frequently, I hope I hit the balance. I think I do.

Turncoat said:

I've also been fond of him (more than fond really). I've been following his careers for decades, but he's a terrible choice as president beyond the self-demonstration room to show what 'The Presidency' has become.

Could you elaborate on this?

Tryptamine said: 

Turncoat said:

I've also been fond of him (more than fond really). I've been following his careers for decades, but he's a terrible choice as president beyond the self-demonstration room to show what 'The Presidency' has become.

Could you elaborate on this?

For the fondness, my folks used to live in New York when they were younger. Through that, they showed me much about Trump in my younger years, but there was no political spin attached to it it was merely over his media presence and the biography in progress that's followed it. Ranging from his pizza hut commercials trying to smooth over the drama of his divorce to Battle of the Billionares, I'd say I've been a huge fan of Trump media for most of my life. 

Having Trump as president however's like having Colonel Sanders become head of the FDA. It's contradictory towards the office position itself and their talent base to the point of suspecting shenanigans, which naturally raises many questions. People literally asked for less lobbying in the Oval Office, yet elected a literal business man who's sold out countless times in the name of his brand, and based on his career pre-presidency of scapegoating his mistakes and rushing into expensive blunderous decisions it gave me a bad feeling about times ahead. 

As for why beyond the contradiction, he's a jack of all trades media mogul who can't keep his words in check, and even his own government's been forced to compensate for his actions more than once (Space Force, the meeting with Putin, etc). He is quite talented at charisma and image, much like Kanye West, as that's been his job for his entire life, but it's people like Mike Pence and Roger Stone that stand to make his abilities cease being solely hammy (not too dissimilar to George Bush II's reign). 

Him being president serves to more blatantly redefine what it means to be a president in the first place, and other countries watching us could risk emulating it due to our ties towards the Globalist agenda. I like Trump, I always have, he's an amazing spectacle to witness, but I wouldn't hire a clown to run a country even if he got top marks at clown college, and yet... it seems the American people would over how he can steer emotional contagion. 

Again, remember that Trump was a Roger Stone project dating back as early as 1998 (a man who's government education came from working with Nixon and involving himself in Watergate). Suspicion is warranted over the puppet king we call president, as while he on his own is essentially harmless and blunderous his cabinet knows how to smooth talk their way into powerful positions of government and business ala Trump Steaks and Trump University; Trump has a weakness for smooth talking con-men that's been demonstrated to us for decades. 

Man, you've got a hard-on for Roger Stone. Possibly appropriately, you name-dropped his book before and I skimmed a bit of it. It was interesting.

I think you've got a good read on his (Trump's) character, and that much is important. But he's also running Republican, which means he is bound to certain rules of the party. Do you have contentions or opinions on his policies?

Tryptamine said: 

Man, you've got a hard-on for Roger Stone. Possibly appropriately, you name-dropped his book before and I skimmed a bit of it. It was interesting.

You act like noticing Roger Stone's contributions is unusual. 

He has a notable hate-crowd that have been following his exploits since the 70s, he invented Super PACs, he's pushed many political shenanigans and has held his own versus popular Democratic debaters on their own shows without going full Jordan Peterson on them... he's not exactly a niche audience figure. 

I think you've got a good read on his character, and that much is important. But he's also running Republican, which means he is bound to certain rules of the party.

He began as a Democrat and only flipped parties down the line based on which side would be more likely to vote for him (with Roger's help I'm sure, although even he's changing parties at this point). He's essentially scoffed at religious people as steerable over God Stuff, and he's not really wrong. 

Do you have contentions or opinions on his policies?

While he himself isn't really doing much beyond the radius of his charisma, the danger he presents is through his cabinet and through how arbitrary and shiftable his views are. He's otherwise signed off on some deals that are pretty bad for the environment, and his cabinet are aiming to push religious angles to the point of reversing progressive progress in many areas such as Abortion rights and Social Security. His dangers are over how what doesn't apply to him is immediately delegated to other, terrible choices, and making him care about those things takes direct threats. 

His biggest policy has been to hide the believed dangers from the American people and otherwise make his pockets shine brighter, yet it seems that others are hit harder with these accusations than the literal business narc. Even his interviews that blatantly show his fears are just disregarded, and his affluence is itself much of what's causing a protest energy to bubble on both sides. 

If he strong arms the public as his leadership style and otherwise won't listen to people, the only way to respond will be assumed to be further strong arming. His responses to his own people express notions of how civil protest won't work, while him responding to what people are escalating towards enables them to further that approach. He's effectively created the perfect conditions for riots, and people are being conditioned by this new environment in ways that may stick around long after his reign. 

                                                                             The Lord's Ambush 

The year is 2022

We've seen election days turn into Election nights. The masses are still divided, however, many on left are questioning the corrupt DNC, some have left the left. Midterm elections has indicated the popular vote.

Clear cut voter fraud in the 2020 elections. That's fine.

With the house the Republicans launched a probe in the midst of the Joe Biden scandal.

Some of you maybe recognize the Joe Biden scandal, it was mentioned here, since Trump was in office and the DNC tried to impeach him for the 2nd time I believe.

The DNC accused Trump of asking a foreign leader, President Zelensky of Ukraine, to investigate the Biden corruption that was known to, well, many of us. The accusation was that Trump had a "quid pro quo" with Zelensky.

Time Stamped from 1:15

^ Quid Pro Quo.

The above clip is Vice President Joe Biden telling Ukraine's previous administration to call off an investigation into "Burisma" ( An oil company based in Ukraine, where Biden's son Hunter was set up with a high paying job, despite not even speaking their native language. It is government corruption. 

So far, Biden had time to disappoint the masses. Showing weakness, empowered the Taliban, putting the Saudis first, and a list of other no-nos that made the republican party more appealing even to never Trumpers. The masses who are more alert about policy in this age, see the difference, and with that the truth.

Fast forward to today. With the house the Republicans are starting bringing it...

Oh the savagery.