If you're uneducated on the matter and have admittedly not studied any topics within it with any real depth, how can YOU say its tangible?
If you're uneducated on the matter and have admittedly not studied any topics within it with any real depth, how can YOU say its tangible?...Because you use a computer? Or do you think God is sending these messages here?
Science is an abstract methodology and a computer is a physical object.
Hence, using a computer does not imply an understanding of Sciences tangibility.
If you're uneducated on the matter and have admittedly not studied any topics within it with any real depth, how can YOU say its tangible?...Because you use a computer? Or do you think God is sending these messages here?Science is an abstract methodology and a computer is a physical object.
Hence, using a computer does not imply an understanding of Sciences tangibility.
You... Look.. I like this pseudo-intellectual talk to a reasonable extent, but don't give me that skies are blue, hence you are wrong, Al-Ghazali wannabe pedantic nonsense-vomit with your nose high up in the air.
Anyone with half a brain understands that science produces tangible results because we employ it in everyday life. You see the evidence in front of your eyes.
If you're uneducated on the matter and have admittedly not studied any topics within it with any real depth, how can YOU say its tangible?...Because you use a computer? Or do you think God is sending these messages here?Science is an abstract methodology and a computer is a physical object.
Hence, using a computer does not imply an understanding of Sciences tangibility.
You... Look.. I like this pseudo-intellectual talk to a reasonable extent, but don't give me that skies are blue, hence you are wrong, Al-Ghazali wannabe pedantic nonsense-vomit with your nose high up in the air.
That doesn't negate my argument.
Anyone with half a brain understands that science produces tangible results because we employ it in everyday life. You see the evidence in front of your eyes.
Observing ones surroundings and making judgments does not equate to utilizing Scientific methodology, hence most people do not use it in everyday life.
Does not equate..........What?
Look, I never said people utilize scientific methodology in everyday life. I'm saying that science has produced that computer in front of you. Do you not see how it would be hypocritical for you to continue using your laptop all the while claiming that science does not produce tangible results..?
And I never said Science doesn't produce tangible results.
I am a research manager at a university, science is my life.
This conversation is about Sint discrediting religion and using the tangibility of science, something he knows very little about, to negate the tangibility of religion, another thing he knows very little about.
Does not equate..........What?
Look, I never said people utilize scientific methodology in everyday life. I'm saying that science has produced that computer in front of you. Do you not see how it would be hypocritical for you to continue using your laptop all the while claiming that science does not produce tangible results..?And I never said Science doesn't produce tangible results.
I am a research manager at a university, science is my life.
This conversation is about Sint discrediting religion and using the tangibility of science, something he knows very little about, to negate the tangibility of religion, another thing he knows very little about.
Edit: Nevermind....... Look, it's pretty neat you being a research manager and all and you are probably very proud of it.. With good reasons.. I'm just a hog farmer... Would be nice to hear about your research at some point. It's really a cool thing and you're probably a very sharp girl...
But.... If you go all high-and-mighty and try to make like your science experience gives you a golden ticket to a exclusive VIP mensa club that non-experts are too stupid to understand again, I will fucking strangle you to death.
Does not equate..........What?
Look, I never said people utilize scientific methodology in everyday life. I'm saying that science has produced that computer in front of you. Do you not see how it would be hypocritical for you to continue using your laptop all the while claiming that science does not produce tangible results..?And I never said Science doesn't produce tangible results.
I am a research manager at a university, science is my life.
This conversation is about Sint discrediting religion and using the tangibility of science, something he knows very little about, to negate the tangibility of religion, another thing he knows very little about.
Edit: Nevermind....... Look, it's pretty neat you being a research manager and all and you are probably very proud of it.. With good reasons.. I'm just a hog farmer... Would be nice to hear about your research at some point. It's really a cool thing and you're probably a very sharp girl...
But.... If you go all high-and-mighty and try to make like your science experience gives you a golden ticket to a exclusive VIP mensa club that non-experts are too stupid to understand again, I will fucking strangle you to death.
I will knock anyone who uses science, despite not having any real experience, as their golden ticket to discredit all of religion down a peg.
Does not equate..........What?
Look, I never said people utilize scientific methodology in everyday life. I'm saying that science has produced that computer in front of you. Do you not see how it would be hypocritical for you to continue using your laptop all the while claiming that science does not produce tangible results..?And I never said Science doesn't produce tangible results.
I am a research manager at a university, science is my life.
This conversation is about Sint discrediting religion and using the tangibility of science, something he knows very little about, to negate the tangibility of religion, another thing he knows very little about.
Edit: Nevermind....... Look, it's pretty neat you being a research manager and all and you are probably very proud of it.. With good reasons.. I'm just a hog farmer... Would be nice to hear about your research at some point. It's really a cool thing and you're probably a very sharp girl...
But.... If you go all high-and-mighty and try to make like your science experience gives you a golden ticket to a exclusive VIP mensa club that non-experts are too stupid to understand again, I will fucking strangle you to death.
I will knock anyone who uses science, despite not having any real experience, as their golden ticket to discredit all of religion down a peg.
But you're just saying that they're ignorant peasants whereas you're an educated scientist. Do you understand why that doesn't strike me as particularly impressive?
Does not equate..........What?
Look, I never said people utilize scientific methodology in everyday life. I'm saying that science has produced that computer in front of you. Do you not see how it would be hypocritical for you to continue using your laptop all the while claiming that science does not produce tangible results..?And I never said Science doesn't produce tangible results.
I am a research manager at a university, science is my life.
This conversation is about Sint discrediting religion and using the tangibility of science, something he knows very little about, to negate the tangibility of religion, another thing he knows very little about.
Edit: Nevermind....... Look, it's pretty neat you being a research manager and all and you are probably very proud of it.. With good reasons.. I'm just a hog farmer... Would be nice to hear about your research at some point. It's really a cool thing and you're probably a very sharp girl...
But.... If you go all high-and-mighty and try to make like your science experience gives you a golden ticket to a exclusive VIP mensa club that non-experts are too stupid to understand again, I will fucking strangle you to death.
I will knock anyone who uses science, despite not having any real experience, as their golden ticket to discredit all of religion down a peg.
But you're just saying that they're ignorant peasants whereas you're an educated scientist.
I was conveying to Sint that he's using something he knows very little about, he admits this, to discredit something else he knows very little about.
That is all, the rest is your imagination.