Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
10 / 42 posts
Posts: 749
0 votes RE: Good, ban Edvard for po...

Why is the fucking content not showing.

I just want other people to read this shit and be confused whether it's part of the post or not.
Posts: 749
0 votes RE: Good, ban Edvard for po...
Turncoat said:

How much work and time do you expect it'd take Edvard these days to form a bandwagon of sympathizers?

That is your tactic, Turncoat. I don't need a bandwagon of sympathizers, nor do I count of them, especially since I figured out you are all cowardly and hypocritical about this place when it comes to people you don't like (Primal).

Maybe you are a helpless twat on your own, but I'm not :D

I just want other people to read this shit and be confused whether it's part of the post or not.
Posts: 5402
0 votes RE: Good, ban Edvard for po...

it is sad that people like you are allowed to vote

Posts: 33412
0 votes RE: Good, ban Edvard for po...
Edvard said: 
Turncoat said:

How much work and time do you expect it'd take Edvard these days to form a bandwagon of sympathizers?

That is your tactic, Turncoat.

...I was asking Cawk because he made the implication that you'd do it, not me.

Trust me, I don't think you have as much bandwagon potential as you used to. You still have some stock, but it's lessened a little bit. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 749
0 votes RE: Good, ban Edvard for po...
Edvard said: 
Turncoat said:

How much work and time do you expect it'd take Edvard these days to form a bandwagon of sympathizers?

That is your tactic, Turncoat.

...I was asking Cawk because he made the implication that you'd do it, not me.

How is this related to me statement?

Trust me, I don't think you have as much bandwagon potential as you used to. You still have some stock, but it's lessened a little bit.

Look at you, valuing my "bandwagon potential" again and commenting on my stock XD

You see these bandwagon tactics everywhere because it's how you deal with things. You think influencing people is a cool mustard manipulator thing to do, but life is not GOT and you're not Varys. You are quite obvious about it to anyone with a little experience in the matter.

I just want other people to read this shit and be confused whether it's part of the post or not.
Posts: 33412
0 votes RE: Good, ban Edvard for po...
Cawk said: 
Cawk said: 

If everyone does it, you can't ban them all. <<< This is what Edvard is trying to accomplish.

No one else is doing it though. 

 Mob mentality game with snowball effect that requires some time--just like in Luna's case. Once started, it can't be stopped anymore by means of communication.

Ed, I was responding to this. ^^^

He is saying you'd get the forum riled up against Meta, while I'm saying you'd fail. If you're aiming to attack the one claiming you'd use a bandwagon, go after Cawk, but if you want to say you could form a bandwagon these days then I am who you want to argue with. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 749
0 votes RE: Good, ban Edvard for po...

He is saying you'd get the forum riled up against Meta, while I'm saying you'd fail. If you're aiming to attack the one claiming you'd use a bandwagon, go after Cawk, but if you want to say you could form a bandwagon these days then I am who you want to argue with. 

My comment was about you, not about Cawk or me, or your discussion.

I swear, it is like everyone is playing dumb today to frustrate me or something.

I just want other people to read this shit and be confused whether it's part of the post or not.
last edit on 5/24/2019 11:28:16 AM
Posts: 33412
0 votes RE: Good, ban Edvard for po...

So... what are you even addressing me for here? 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 749
0 votes RE: Good, ban Edvard for po...

So... what are you even addressing me for here? 

 My first post is pretty clear.

I just want other people to read this shit and be confused whether it's part of the post or not.
last edit on 5/24/2019 11:41:04 AM
Posts: 33412
0 votes RE: Good, ban Edvard for po...

So it was just an excuse for a jab? 

 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
10 / 42 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.