Sociopath Community

Good said: 

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

Billy said: 

BranTheBroken said: 

Interesting with BPD. Seems like Primal got beat by her husband, felt guilty about hitting back, decided she's a psychopath because she defended herself and then seems to have lost her mind completely and started projecting and attacking her BPD self on others as well. Since PF is closed and both the BPD and SC forum seem done with her, where will Primal post now?

after observing her behavior for some time, and being on the receiving end of some of her antics, ive kinda put her in the PPD category of traits.

hey, we are all human and im no angel either. i still want her to come back to SC as she was a good contributor. i still consider her my internet friend even though she beat the fuck out of me. i can look past that and am willing to start fresh.

seems we all can justify our bad behavior, "they deserved it"

What you call 'bad' behavior, I call justice.

"Just-Us is Blind". 

I don't really believe in it beyond the feeling it elicits.

It is another way of saying 'to get what you deserve'.

What is "deserved" is relative though. There's no way to justify it beyond a mob mentality (beyond some baser instinct arguments depending on the 'crime' in question). 

Actions have consequences and anyone that forgets it, I do my best to remind them. 

Are consequences something worth "winging it" though? 

I personally prefer to see a cleverly established protocol set a consistent framework for it. It helps for getting around the room for personal bias when it's otherwise cut and dry. 

You are delusional if you believe you can start afresh with Primal, in fact, it's quite the amusing concept. Your 'friend' will destroy you if she had the chance. If you chose to be a fool, that is your choice, of course, I am merely advising.

I think I could make it work, if I bothered to anyway. 

She's social, but I can't help but feel that it requires some degree of playing along if you're to get anywhere at the beginning.

Do as you wish, you have been warned. 

Warned about what, her backstabbing potential? 

What can she even do? I just have to avoid doing things that might result in a lawsuit. 

Just a reminder, she is not banned because she is not an angel, but because I respect my friends.

That seems like a weird reason to ban someone, on it's own anyway. 

If you have the power to end your friends suffering and you chose not to and the reason is something as pathetic as SC principles, then your friend would be wise to get away from you.

If they're a true friend, they'd understand when some areas operate as exceptions, especially if it's a matter of something established in advance instead of some impulse or whim. I wouldn't make exceptions to the rules for my friends or against my 'enemies', and I don't think that makes me a terrible person, but rather instead a consistent one who doesn't put one's own feelings first. 

So far, my friends who use this website understand the risks and don't expect any sort of special treatment. They've demonstrated that they can handle themselves and don't need any sort of special coddling. If something went awry on this website and it fit within the principles they'd agreed to when attending, they understand that "it's not really up to me", and the complications that arise from breaking something like that. 

If a 'friend' expects special privileges because of "being friends with the mod", that's fucked up and should not be supported. It makes sense to uphold what works instead of bend and break over people appealing to feels. 

Out of everyone on SC combined, Primal has done more(for autists like TC: in terms of member on member damage). SC is not even a big deal, PF is where the real shit was at.

What has she really done beyond the lawsuit, anuses, and arguably wasted time? 

Billy said: 

maybe you are correct. im sure she has justified her actions in some way

She has: for example you are a pedophile that needs to be exterminated in her eyes. A great starting point for any friendly relationship.

That just means that it'd take extra steps. 

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

Billy said: 

BranTheBroken said: 

Interesting with BPD. Seems like Primal got beat by her husband, felt guilty about hitting back, decided she's a psychopath because she defended herself and then seems to have lost her mind completely and started projecting and attacking her BPD self on others as well. Since PF is closed and both the BPD and SC forum seem done with her, where will Primal post now?

after observing her behavior for some time, and being on the receiving end of some of her antics, ive kinda put her in the PPD category of traits.

hey, we are all human and im no angel either. i still want her to come back to SC as she was a good contributor. i still consider her my internet friend even though she beat the fuck out of me. i can look past that and am willing to start fresh.

seems we all can justify our bad behavior, "they deserved it"

What you call 'bad' behavior, I call justice.

"Just-Us is Blind". 

I don't really believe in it beyond the feeling it elicits.

It is another way of saying 'to get what you deserve'.

What is "deserved" is relative though. There's no way to justify it beyond a mob mentality (beyond some baser instinct arguments depending on the 'crime' in question). 

Yes, I decide what people deserve. You have to make judgement calls in life.

Actions have consequences and anyone that forgets it, I do my best to remind them. 

Are consequences something worth "winging it" though? 

I personally prefer to see a cleverly established protocol set a consistent framework for it. It helps for getting around the room for personal bias when it's otherwise cut and dry. 

I have my own principles.

You are delusional if you believe you can start afresh with Primal, in fact, it's quite the amusing concept. Your 'friend' will destroy you if she had the chance. If you chose to be a fool, that is your choice, of course, I am merely advising.

I think I could make it work, if I bothered to anyway. 

She's social, but I can't help but feel that it requires some degree of playing along if you're to get anywhere at the beginning.

Do as you wish, you have been warned. 

Warned about what, her backstabbing potential? 

What can she even do? I just have to avoid doing things that might result in a lawsuit. 

If she can't do anything, then you are not really engaging her, or you have nothing to lose.

Just a reminder, she is not banned because she is not an angel, but because I respect my friends.

That seems like a weird reason to ban someone, on it's own anyway. 

If you have the power to end your friends suffering and you chose not to and the reason is something as pathetic as SC principles, then your friend would be wise to get away from you.

If they're a true friend, they'd understand when some areas operate as exceptions, especially if it's a matter of something established in advance instead of some impulse or whim. I wouldn't make exceptions to the rules for my friends or against my 'enemies', and I don't think that makes me a terrible person, but rather instead a consistent one who doesn't put one's own feelings first. 

So far, my friends who use this website understand the risks and don't expect any sort of special treatment. They've demonstrated that they can handle themselves and don't need any sort of special coddling. If something went awry on this website and it fit within the principles they'd agreed to when attending, they understand that "it's not really up to me", and the complications that arise from breaking something like that. 

If a 'friend' expects special privileges because of "being friends with the mod", that's fucked up and should not be supported. It makes sense to uphold what works instead of bend and break over people appealing to feels. 

In essence, you put something irrelevant above your friendship, the rest is excuses for your behavior. And this thesis is irrelevant to the case, Primal uses the platform to attack people who do not use the platform.

Out of everyone on SC combined, Primal has done more(for autists like TC: in terms of member on member damage). SC is not even a big deal, PF is where the real shit was at.

What has she really done beyond the lawsuit, anuses, and arguably wasted time?

'What has she done beyond doing more than everyone on SC combined?'
Regardless, she has done more, which is in essence use trusted information given to her for malicious purposes. I have no intention to elaborate.

Billy said: 

maybe you are correct. im sure she has justified her actions in some way

She has: for example you are a pedophile that needs to be exterminated in her eyes. A great starting point for any friendly relationship.

That just means that it'd take extra steps.

Step 1: let go of your dignity, integrity, and principles

Good said: 

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

 

What you call 'bad' behavior, I call justice.

"Just-Us is Blind". 

I don't really believe in it beyond the feeling it elicits.

It is another way of saying 'to get what you deserve'.

What is "deserved" is relative though. There's no way to justify it beyond a mob mentality (beyond some baser instinct arguments depending on the 'crime' in question). 

Yes, I decide what people deserve. You have to make judgement calls in life.

So you're Mr. Judge-Jury-and-Executioner now? 

Your original model here was more detached. 

Actions have consequences and anyone that forgets it, I do my best to remind them. 

Are consequences something worth "winging it" though? 

I personally prefer to see a cleverly established protocol set a consistent framework for it. It helps for getting around the room for personal bias when it's otherwise cut and dry. 

I have my own principles.

That sounds like a non-answer to allow yourself to justify your feelings after you've already done things. 

Feelings need to be controlled, or else they will take control of us instead. A protocol that goes beyond ourselves by choice is how to be better than ourselves. 



If you respond purely to your feelings, you're that much more of an animal and people will see you as such. 

I think I could make it work, if I bothered to anyway. 

She's social, but I can't help but feel that it requires some degree of playing along if you're to get anywhere at the beginning.

Do as you wish, you have been warned. 

Warned about what, her backstabbing potential? 

What can she even do? I just have to avoid doing things that might result in a lawsuit. 

If she can't do anything, then you are not really engaging her, or you have nothing to lose. 

Or I just haven't done anything that might result in a lawsuit..? 

This seems a bit dramatic. 

Just a reminder, she is not banned because she is not an angel, but because I respect my friends.

That seems like a weird reason to ban someone, on it's own anyway. 

If you have the power to end your friends suffering and you chose not to and the reason is something as pathetic as SC principles, then your friend would be wise to get away from you.

If they're a true friend, they'd understand when some areas operate as exceptions, especially if it's a matter of something established in advance instead of some impulse or whim. I wouldn't make exceptions to the rules for my friends or against my 'enemies', and I don't think that makes me a terrible person, but rather instead a consistent one who doesn't put one's own feelings first. 

So far, my friends who use this website understand the risks and don't expect any sort of special treatment. They've demonstrated that they can handle themselves and don't need any sort of special coddling. If something went awry on this website and it fit within the principles they'd agreed to when attending, they understand that "it's not really up to me", and the complications that arise from breaking something like that. 

If a 'friend' expects special privileges because of "being friends with the mod", that's fucked up and should not be supported. It makes sense to uphold what works instead of bend and break over people appealing to feels. 

In essence, you put something irrelevant above your friendship, the rest is excuses for your behavior. And this thesis is irrelevant to the case, Primal uses the platform to attack people who do not use the platform. 

It's called having integrity, which is thankfully something they understand. 

It's a shame that you don't seem to get it. 

Out of everyone on SC combined, Primal has done more(for autists like TC: in terms of member on member damage). SC is not even a big deal, PF is where the real shit was at.

What has she really done beyond the lawsuit, anuses, and arguably wasted time?

'What has she done beyond doing more than everyone on SC combined?'
Regardless, she has done more, which is in essence use trusted information given to her for malicious purposes. I have no intention to elaborate.

Done more what? 

Not having any intention to elaborate's kinda shady. I understand you not wanting to talk about how she's hit you personally, but didn't you just say that she's hit a lot of people? Surely there must be some detached stories that show her 'treachery'. 

Billy said: 

maybe you are correct. im sure she has justified her actions in some way

She has: for example you are a pedophile that needs to be exterminated in her eyes. A great starting point for any friendly relationship.

That just means that it'd take extra steps.

Step 1: let go of your dignity, integrity, and principles

You hold onto this sort of shit way too tightly. 

Sometimes it pays to humble yourself as a temporary choice. 

Turncoat said: 

So you're Mr. Judge-Jury-and-Executioner now? 

Your original model here was more detached. 

I had no model at all. There is time to research and there is time to act. If you are not Judge-Jury-and-Executioner, then you do nothing in your life. Make whatever excuses you want, it is true.

I have my own principles.

That sounds like a non-answer to allow yourself to justify your feelings after you've already done things. 

Feelings need to be controlled, or else they will take control of us instead. A protocol that goes beyond ourselves by choice is how to be better than ourselves. 

If you respond purely to your feelings, you're that much more of an animal and people will see you as such. 

If it sounds like a non-answer to you then this is your problem, not mine. All the rest of the emotional mumbo jumbo is just that: rabble. Principles do not have to be rooted in emotions and you should not ignore emotions and you should not just use emotions blindly. Its a combination of all things.

In fact, this has nothing to do with emotions at all, its laughable that you completely assume it. Emotions are sensory info, a catalyst, a motivator and they give power to your actions. Nothing to do with reasons. Just because I use emotion to give power to my actions, does not mean emotion is the reason behind it. Every few months I have to explain what integrity is on here.

If she can't do anything, then you are not really engaging her, or you have nothing to lose. 

Or I just haven't done anything that might result in a lawsuit..? 

This seems a bit dramatic.

Or you can reread what I said ?? But then again, you do not understand basic trust from what I've seen. So maybe you just won't get it.

In essence, you put something irrelevant above your friendship, the rest is excuses for your behavior. And this thesis is irrelevant to the case, Primal uses the platform to attack people who do not use the platform. 

It's called having integrity, which is thankfully something they understand. 

It's a shame that you don't seem to get it. 

The more I talk with you, the more I see exactly what you do, keep it up and I will treat you as I treat sugar.

Your 'integrity' is a joke. I would never trust anyone like you even on a colleague level.

And once again, it is irrelevant to the case where the person in question does not use the platform. Real-life people have come to this site and I have told them what you have told your rl friends. So if you wanted to use this against me, you can't. They won't be privileged, but if their livelihood is endangered in a substantial way and they are my friend, I have to choose between an online community of malicious people or someone I trust and have built an understanding and I meet irl, who do you think is more valuable? From the point of view of my friend, I can at least not participate in their demise. And if that were to happen, I would step down as admin or get rid of the problem, it would be your choice, as it always has been. But the chances of this are so unpractically low, under 1%, this is just for the sake of argument.

'What has she done beyond doing more than everyone on SC combined?'
Regardless, she has done more, which is in essence use trusted information given to her for malicious purposes. I have no intention to elaborate.

Done more what? 

Not having any intention to elaborate's kinda shady. I understand you not wanting to talk about how she's hit you personally, but didn't you just say that she's hit a lot of people? Surely there must be some detached stories that show her 'treachery". 

She has stalked and harassed her ex for 10 years if I remember the number of years correctly.

You hold onto this sort of shit way too tightly. 

Sometimes it pays to humble yourself as a temporary choice. 

Sometimes, in fact, most of the time I do. But this is so far away from these cases, it's hilarious you would suggest it.

"I have to choose between an online community of malicious people or someone I trust and have built an understanding and I meet irl, who do you think is more valuable?"

:)

what's funny is she is still causing drama here. lol

Chet?

Sven said: 

what's funny is she is still causing drama here. lol

That takes no work though. 

why did Jim say Sven was chet