what are these complex words you use, go away
Cheery bye!
This thread reeks of sour grapes. I bet humility has been tried and failed, so now it's because humility is gay and not because you're too weak to apply yourself in a virtuous manner.
You are both making assumptions about my reasons and attacking me unprovoked. An empty shell of an argument, and proves exactly my point about people who shove "humility" on others.
My grandiose delusions are better than yours.
This thread reeks of sour grapes. I bet humility has been tried and failed, so now it's because humility is gay and not because you're too weak to apply yourself in a virtuous manner.
You are both making assumptions about my reasons and attacking me unprovoked. An empty shell of an argument, and proves exactly my point about people who shove "humility" on others.
You perceiving this as an attack is quite a telling sign that I must have struck a chord. Otherwise you'd gloss over it like you do when something doesn't apply to you.
This thread reeks of sour grapes. I bet humility has been tried and failed, so now it's because humility is gay and not because you're too weak to apply yourself in a virtuous manner.
You are both making assumptions about my reasons and attacking me unprovoked. An empty shell of an argument, and proves exactly my point about people who shove "humility" on others.
You perceiving this as an attack is quite a telling sign that I must have struck a chord. Otherwise you'd gloss over it like you do when something doesn't apply to you.
False assumptions and inaccuracies annoy me. You are cheap.
My grandiose delusions are better than yours.
This thread reeks of sour grapes. I bet humility has been tried and failed, so now it's because humility is gay and not because you're too weak to apply yourself in a virtuous manner.
You are both making assumptions about my reasons and attacking me unprovoked. An empty shell of an argument, and proves exactly my point about people who shove "humility" on others.
You perceiving this as an attack is quite a telling sign that I must have struck a chord. Otherwise you'd gloss over it like you do when something doesn't apply to you.
False assumptions and inaccuracies annoy me. You are cheap.
You'd rather argue about the tone and nature of which words are said than about the actual words themselves, which in itself is low and dishonest. Your arrogance has already shown to be false confidence, which stems from a place of insecurity. Everyone on SC sees this. In the end, it all comes down to possessing the very strength of character you put so much effort into faking.
This thread reeks of sour grapes. I bet humility has been tried and failed, so now it's because humility is gay and not because you're too weak to apply yourself in a virtuous manner.
You are both making assumptions about my reasons and attacking me unprovoked. An empty shell of an argument, and proves exactly my point about people who shove "humility" on others.
You perceiving this as an attack is quite a telling sign that I must have struck a chord. Otherwise you'd gloss over it like you do when something doesn't apply to you.
False assumptions and inaccuracies annoy me. You are cheap.
You'd rather argue about the tone and nature of which words are said than about the actual words themselves, which in itself is low and dishonest. Your arrogance has already shown to be false confidence, which stems from a place of insecurity. Everyone on SC sees this. In the end, it all comes down to possessing the very strength of character you put so much effort into faking.
You have the audacity to speak as if you have at one point possessed me and had the ability to feel the feelings in my mind, and therefore make the claim you are making about my thoughts.
No Xadem, maybe some people just really ARE confident. Not everything has to have some extra layer, and not everybody has depression like you do. I just AM. I don't fake shit, I am very candid in my thoughts and I clearly display them in their unfiltered glory all over this forum. If you find my mentality distasteful that is alright but don't you dare call it fake, because it is NOT. To call it fake is to imply you have possessed my mind to gleam that insight, which makes it fallacious.
I am arguing that you assuming that I tried and failed at humility is just that, an assumption. And since it is an assumption it is subject to, and is- false. So maybe you should argue based on objective truths and not theories.
My grandiose delusions are better than yours.
last edit on
5/22/2019 4:49:55 AM
This thread reeks of sour grapes. I bet humility has been tried and failed, so now it's because humility is gay and not because you're too weak to apply yourself in a virtuous manner.
You are both making assumptions about my reasons and attacking me unprovoked. An empty shell of an argument, and proves exactly my point about people who shove "humility" on others.
You perceiving this as an attack is quite a telling sign that I must have struck a chord. Otherwise you'd gloss over it like you do when something doesn't apply to you.
False assumptions and inaccuracies annoy me. You are cheap.
You'd rather argue about the tone and nature of which words are said than about the actual words themselves, which in itself is low and dishonest. Your arrogance has already shown to be false confidence, which stems from a place of insecurity. Everyone on SC sees this. In the end, it all comes down to possessing the very strength of character you put so much effort into faking.
You have the audacity to speak as if you have at one point possessed me and had the ability to feel the feelings in my mind, and therefore make the claim you are making about my thoughts.
No Xadem, maybe some people just really ARE confident. Not everything has to have some extra layer, and everybody has depression like you do. I just AM. I don't fake shit, I am very candid in my thoughts and I clearly display them in their unfiltered glory all over this forum. If you find my mentality distasteful that is alright but don't you dare call it fake, because it is NOT. To call it fake is to imply you have possessed my mind to gleam that insight, which makes it fallacious.
I am arguing that you assuming that I tried and failed at humility is just that, an assumption. And since it is an assumption it is subject to, and is- false. So maybe you should argue based on objective truths and not theories.
But you're not confident. Clearly. And yes I can tell because your façade of strength is flimsy. You changed your tune overnight from when you first arrived, then something (Idk what) happened and you started proclaiming yourself as great, visibly forced, and yet you kept failing to take any hint of criticism without whining like a child.
You can dish it out, but you can't take it, so yes that leads me to believe that you are deeply insecure and compensating. Sadly for you, this is very common so that doesn't make you special either.
This thread reeks of sour grapes. I bet humility has been tried and failed, so now it's because humility is gay and not because you're too weak to apply yourself in a virtuous manner.
You are both making assumptions about my reasons and attacking me unprovoked. An empty shell of an argument, and proves exactly my point about people who shove "humility" on others.
You perceiving this as an attack is quite a telling sign that I must have struck a chord. Otherwise you'd gloss over it like you do when something doesn't apply to you.
False assumptions and inaccuracies annoy me. You are cheap.
You'd rather argue about the tone and nature of which words are said than about the actual words themselves, which in itself is low and dishonest. Your arrogance has already shown to be false confidence, which stems from a place of insecurity. Everyone on SC sees this. In the end, it all comes down to possessing the very strength of character you put so much effort into faking.
You have the audacity to speak as if you have at one point possessed me and had the ability to feel the feelings in my mind, and therefore make the claim you are making about my thoughts.
No Xadem, maybe some people just really ARE confident. Not everything has to have some extra layer, and everybody has depression like you do. I just AM. I don't fake shit, I am very candid in my thoughts and I clearly display them in their unfiltered glory all over this forum. If you find my mentality distasteful that is alright but don't you dare call it fake, because it is NOT. To call it fake is to imply you have possessed my mind to gleam that insight, which makes it fallacious.
I am arguing that you assuming that I tried and failed at humility is just that, an assumption. And since it is an assumption it is subject to, and is- false. So maybe you should argue based on objective truths and not theories.
But you're not confident. Clearly. And yes I can tell because your façade of strength is flimsy. You changed your tune overnight from when you first arrived, then something (Idk what) happened and you started proclaiming yourself as great, visibly forced, and yet you kept failing to take any hint of criticism without whining like a child.
You can dish it out, but you can't take it, so yes that leads me to believe that you are deeply insecure and compensating. Sadly for you, this is very common so that doesn't make you special either.
My first posts literally declared me God Emperor of SC, what are you talking about? I am the most consistent, and I have the most quality in my posts so I have the right to call myself great. I will take criticism that is valid. Now, what happened overnight was someone on this site posted a video attacking my wife and I rightfully reacted angrily to it. You also laughed at the video being uploaded and I didnt forget it.
My grandiose delusions are better than yours.
You have to hurt people sometimes if you have made a pact with a demon. If you haven't than stay as humble as can be and you will be rewarded. If you have made a pact than it better be for a good reason, so that you can justify the harm you cause in the long run
timsecapsule.com