Sociopath Community

My skimming skills are unfortunate today.

Lena said: 

Tryptamine said: 

Why, did everyone already decide what would happen?

 Yeah, we even discussed the double standards concerning Jim and cawk 

 There is no double standard. Cawk wasn't banned for what he is, he was banned for what he did.

Very simple.

Tryptamine said: 

Many who are complaining about Cawk are holding total double-standards. When Jim (and others) shit up the site several times, you all got angry, but now things are apparently fine. But when Cawk does it? I'm guessing you're all just not as fond of him. Most people here have a combative side, even take the scorched earth route (how many people here have doxed others?). You're not on the moral high ground. Let it drop, and if shit that threatens the site continues, the can sit out for a while. Or forever. Let that bridge be crossed if it's arrived at.

And I know what's coming. "We did this before, it keeps happening!" My response to that is many of us here have learned to cooperate by being able to set old shit aside.

 I'd like Jim banned too, and anyone else who is like Cawk, but I'm just working with what I got. Jim is still a pedophile and as such never a friend to me. 

Though I highly doubt Jim would get banned, and thus the less the better. 

Anyway, if majority of this forum agrees that Cawk shouldn't be unbanned, then I'd say we should just move on from this thread, and move on without Cawk, no need to feed the parasite in any capacity. 

But guys can't you see, cawk's antagonism has brought us all closer together! 

Xadem said: 

But guys can't you see, cawk's antagonism has brought us all closer together! 

That's what Xadem's mom said about his deadbeat crack-addict dad.

Learning like a good virgin boy.

Sintetika said: 

Tryptamine said: 

Many who are complaining about Cawk are holding total double-standards. When Jim (and others) shit up the site several times, you all got angry, but now things are apparently fine. But when Cawk does it? I'm guessing you're all just not as fond of him. Most people here have a combative side, even take the scorched earth route (how many people here have doxed others?). You're not on the moral high ground. Let it drop, and if shit that threatens the site continues, the can sit out for a while. Or forever. Let that bridge be crossed if it's arrived at.

And I know what's coming. "We did this before, it keeps happening!" My response to that is many of us here have learned to cooperate by being able to set old shit aside.

 I'd like Jim banned too, and anyone else who is like Cawk, but I'm just working with what I got. Jim is still a pedophile and as such never a friend to me. 

Though I highly doubt Jim would get banned, and thus the less the better. 

 rent free in ur head

Sintetika said: 

Tryptamine said: 

Many who are complaining about Cawk are holding total double-standards. When Jim (and others) shit up the site several times, you all got angry, but now things are apparently fine. But when Cawk does it? I'm guessing you're all just not as fond of him. Most people here have a combative side, even take the scorched earth route (how many people here have doxed others?). You're not on the moral high ground. Let it drop, and if shit that threatens the site continues, the can sit out for a while. Or forever. Let that bridge be crossed if it's arrived at.

And I know what's coming. "We did this before, it keeps happening!" My response to that is many of us here have learned to cooperate by being able to set old shit aside.

 I'd like Jim banned too, and anyone else who is like Cawk, but I'm just working with what I got. Jim is still a pedophile and as such never a friend to me. 

Though I highly doubt Jim would get banned, and thus the less the better. 

It's, for once, somewhat like Spatial was saying: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Cawk wasn't banned for what he is, he was banned for what he did.

Granted, while it seems like his likeness is banned, how much CP has Jim posted here? 

We aren't think police, we're a cleaning service. 

Sintetika said: 

Anyway, if majority of this forum agrees that Cawk shouldn't be unbanned, then I'd say we should just move on from this thread, and move on without Cawk, no need to feed the parasite in any capacity. 

But I like feeding him. 

He's like a mosquito, except we have the choice of squeezing our hand when he injects his face into it to the point of bursting him.