Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
10 / 68 posts
Posts: 2866
0 votes RE: Truce offer
Lena said: 
Good said: 
Lena said: 
Good said: 

yes but tc was the one coddling, beast feeding him and grooming him to attack luna, now cawk attacks this place. do u not see how that's karma? it's the same thing he did to crave after she used him for the same purpose.

tc talked about doxxing me to cawk, the difference is i'm not bullshitting for attention.

'do u not see how that's karma?'

Its you, not karma. You are using cawk, as you claim TC used him.

But that does not matter to me, I was annoyed that you will give anything to cawk, especially after his latest fiasco and all the others before. He does not deserve it.
Not that I expect this to change anything, just explaining.

 

 Weren't you the one that left him unbanned instead of enforcing the rules you shut down the forum for? Why did you allow him that after he identified himself as cawk? Especially after his latest fiasco and all the others before. He does not deserve it. Why did you do it meta?

When? Now? He is banned now??

 Yes, thank you for coming back to your senses which one of the girls knocked some sense into you this time? I have to thank her 

I had not made any real decision or even thought about it for real until I made the post where I banned him. It is not an important matter in my life. I just approved his account because if he abused it, it would be an easy decision where I don't need to think, those are my favorite.

Cheery bye!
Posts: 678
0 votes RE: Truce offer
Good said: 
Lena said: 
Good said: 
Lena said: 
Good said: 

yes but tc was the one coddling, beast feeding him and grooming him to attack luna, now cawk attacks this place. do u not see how that's karma? it's the same thing he did to crave after she used him for the same purpose.

tc talked about doxxing me to cawk, the difference is i'm not bullshitting for attention.

'do u not see how that's karma?'

Its you, not karma. You are using cawk, as you claim TC used him.

But that does not matter to me, I was annoyed that you will give anything to cawk, especially after his latest fiasco and all the others before. He does not deserve it.
Not that I expect this to change anything, just explaining.

 

 Weren't you the one that left him unbanned instead of enforcing the rules you shut down the forum for? Why did you allow him that after he identified himself as cawk? Especially after his latest fiasco and all the others before. He does not deserve it. Why did you do it meta?

When? Now? He is banned now??

 Yes, thank you for coming back to your senses which one of the girls knocked some sense into you this time? I have to thank her 

I had not made any real decision or even thought about it for real until I made the post where I banned him. It is not an important matter in my life. I just approved his account because if he abused it, it would be an easy decision where I don't need to think, those are my favorite.

 Oh, I bet they are.

Posts: 2866
0 votes RE: Truce offer
Lena said: 
Good said: 

I had not made any real decision or even thought about it for real until I made the post where I banned him. It is not an important matter in my life. I just approved his account because if he abused it, it would be an easy decision where I don't need to think, those are my favorite.

 Oh, I bet they are.

Yeah, I have better things to do then care about a pedophile.

Cheery bye!
Posts: 678
0 votes RE: Truce offer
Good said: 
Lena said: 
Good said: 

I had not made any real decision or even thought about it for real until I made the post where I banned him. It is not an important matter in my life. I just approved his account because if he abused it, it would be an easy decision where I don't need to think, those are my favorite.

 Oh, I bet they are.

Yeah, I have better things to do then care about a pedophile.

 Yeah I bet you do~

Posts: 3965
0 votes RE: Truce offer

LMAO i love u boo

Posts: 4564
0 votes RE: Truce offer

Many who are complaining about Cawk are holding total double-standards. When Jim (and others) shit up the site several times, you all got angry, but now things are apparently fine. But when Cawk does it? I'm guessing you're all just not as fond of him. Most people here have a combative side, even take the scorched earth route (how many people here have doxed others?). You're not on the moral high ground. Let it drop, and if shit that threatens the site continues, the can sit out for a while. Or forever. Let that bridge be crossed if it's arrived at.

And I know what's coming. "We did this before, it keeps happening!" My response to that is many of us here have learned to cooperate by being able to set old shit aside.

last edit on 10/16/2019 9:02:19 PM
Posts: 678
0 votes RE: Truce offer

Many who are complaining about Cawk are holding total double-standards. When Jim (and others) shit up the site several times, you all got angry, but now things are apparently fine. But when Cawk does it? I'm guessing you're all just not as fond of him. Most people here have a combative side, even take the scorched earth route (how many people here have doxed others?). Let it drop, and if shit that threatens the site continues, the can sit out for a while. Or forever. Let that bridge be crossed if it's arrived at.

And I know what's coming. "We did this before, it keeps happening!" My response to that is many of us here have learned to cooperate by being able to set old shit aside.

 You're very late to this party.

Posts: 4564
0 votes RE: Truce offer

Why, did everyone already decide what would happen?

Posts: 33392
0 votes RE: Truce offer

Why, did everyone already decide what would happen?

This is on page 3: 

Good said: 

  • Most of everyone wanted cawk banned
  • He has posted CP while being 'nice'
  • He has relentlessly posted CP after being banned as well
  • If we do not respect the rules, might as well not have them
  • Even if the initial ban was not so much for the CP, I have concluded it should have been and he has done it since.

If he didn't post CP, I would have made a poll to vote.
But if I make a poll now, it would be a poll if we respect the no CP rule. And if we do not, then this is not a website for you.

If you want to be here, pretend not to be cawk.

 

nani acc is banned.

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 678
0 votes RE: Truce offer

Why, did everyone already decide what would happen?

 Yeah, we even discussed the double standards concerning Jim and cawk 

10 / 68 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.