Sociopath Community

Spatial Mind said: 

 The title of this thread is false.

Whorechata said: 

My understanding of the dox rule was:

If it is your dox, you may request a mod to take the dox down. The dox was open to be anything covering pictures, addresses, phone numbers, social media of that particular person.

However if it was a dox of that persons family member or friend, then that family member or friend must register and ask for it to be taken down but that's easy to fake as well looking back at what happened with Pink01; she asked for her dad's dox to be taken down and when called, her dad had no issues with it being up.

So are we changing the dox rules? Why are we changing them now- what was the catalyst for this?

That was never the way it worked. 

Family, friends, school and work are one's personal business, that is anything that can lead to a liability for the person and the forum are removable on request. The reasons for this vary including online defamation being enough to get the site shut down.

.

.

.

From what I gather, TC and Alena are conspiring to raise the bar in their campaign to bully Med over how ridiculous she is, but there's no cause for changing any rules. TC obviously wants push his boundaries as one of his favorite things to do around here is doxxing.  

I'm not bullying her. She's literally put out my name and picture and everything I've done has been in response to the actions she has taken. And yes, it was said the dox would be taken down by request of that person being doxed. 

Wait do you think I'm bullying med?

Spatial Mind said: 

 The title of this thread is false.

Whorechata said: 

My understanding of the dox rule was:

If it is your dox, you may request a mod to take the dox down. The dox was open to be anything covering pictures, addresses, phone numbers, social media of that particular person.

However if it was a dox of that persons family member or friend, then that family member or friend must register and ask for it to be taken down but that's easy to fake as well looking back at what happened with Pink01; she asked for her dad's dox to be taken down and when called, her dad had no issues with it being up.

So are we changing the dox rules? Why are we changing them now- what was the catalyst for this?

That was never the way it worked. 

Family, friends, school and work are one's personal business, that is anything that can lead to a liability for the person and the forum are removable on request. The reasons for this vary including online defamation being enough to get the site shut down.

Family and personal business is still personal details. 

Friends are another matter, anyone can be like "I want my friend's dox down", and believe me, people have been. 

Like we discussed prior, where do we draw the line for what is and isn't "a friend"? 

From what I gather, TC and Alena are conspiring to raise the bar in their campaign to bully Med over how ridiculous she is

No, we're trying to enact our SC rights and a few parties are interested in exercising more censorship than we'd otherwise grown to know. 

Even Inq isn't going this far with it, this is just your dogma biasing your read here based on current context and your new self-elected coaching position. 

but there's no cause for changing any rules.

Yes. 

TC obviously wants push his boundaries as one of his favorite things to do around here is doxxing.  

If you really insist on hashing up old unrelated news...

During that brief chapter you've let inflate further with time, that was just you. It was only after you doxed Jim's friends and family in chat during... whatever you'd call yelling Jim's name in all caps is, that I snagged what Vultus had been posting in chat and used it as the means for "an eye for an eye", and you've since leaked info on Jim a second time on this forum during his suicidal bender. 

You're free to call out other examples for "one of my favorite things" though, but in your shoes I wouldn't try to act like you're above it, otherwise people might be tempted to prove you wrong. 

Whorechata said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

 The title of this thread is false.

Whorechata said: 

My understanding of the dox rule was:

If it is your dox, you may request a mod to take the dox down. The dox was open to be anything covering pictures, addresses, phone numbers, social media of that particular person.

However if it was a dox of that persons family member or friend, then that family member or friend must register and ask for it to be taken down but that's easy to fake as well looking back at what happened with Pink01; she asked for her dad's dox to be taken down and when called, her dad had no issues with it being up.

So are we changing the dox rules? Why are we changing them now- what was the catalyst for this?

That was never the way it worked. 

Family, friends, school and work are one's personal business, that is anything that can lead to a liability for the person and the forum are removable on request. The reasons for this vary including online defamation being enough to get the site shut down.

.

.

.

From what I gather, TC and Alena are conspiring to raise the bar in their campaign to bully Med over how ridiculous she is, but there's no cause for changing any rules. TC obviously wants push his boundaries as one of his favorite things to do around here is doxxing.  

I'm not bullying her. She's literally put out my name and picture and everything I've done has been in response to the actions she has taken. And yes, it was said the dox would be taken down by request of that person being doxed. 

Wait do you think I'm bullying med?

He's made that sentiment known to me as well, and won't look at Med's involvements in it at all. 

He's stuck defaulting on her being the victim and won't listen to reason, but maybe time will show him what others otherwise already see. 

Actually Inq's position is to generally remove pics upon request. He's always done that as far as I know. 

MissCommunication said: 

Actually Inq's position is to generally remove pics upon request. He's always done that as far as I know. 

Like... just any picture? 

Even so my above point was over how Inq isn't making this about some sort of cartoonish plot, he's discussing clauses and terms. 

What is wrong with: If the person wants their picture taken down, take it down?

Say I post a picture, and then regret it later, or have posted it by accident, intoxicated, (insert reasons here), whatever.

Is it not humane to allow the person to dictate what to do with his own photos...?

MotherfuckingShuttle said: 

What is wrong with: If the person wants their picture taken down, take it down?

Say I post a picture, and then regret it later, or have posted it by accident, intoxicated, (insert reasons here), whatever.

Is it not humane to allow the person to dictate what to do with his own photos...?

 How do you post something by accident? If you're intoxicated why would the rest of the forum have to babysit you and your bad decisions?

Whorechata said: 

MotherfuckingShuttle said: 

What is wrong with: If the person wants their picture taken down, take it down?

Say I post a picture, and then regret it later, or have posted it by accident, intoxicated, (insert reasons here), whatever.

Is it not humane to allow the person to dictate what to do with his own photos...?

How do you post something by accident? If you're intoxicated why would the rest of the forum have to babysit you and your bad decisions?

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Actually Inq's position is to generally remove pics upon request. He's always done that as far as I know. 

Like... just any picture? 

 no dum dum, pics of the person xd

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Actually Inq's position is to generally remove pics upon request. He's always done that as far as I know. 

Like... just any picture? 

 no dum dum, pics of the person xd

So not their friends?