They simply never participated. The beautiful ones did not get into scraps. They actually did not need to defend a nest.
They just drank and ate and groomed. They avoided the others. In turn they were the healthy ones.
Maybe nature took its course. In the grand scheme for human beings though. There is an emasculation of man taking place in our society today. Men are expected to just not make a pass at a woman, in a world where a complement in a workspace can destroy a guy.
Traditional family will become a rare thing.
Physically they appeared healthy due to the autist like self grooming, but they were not healthy in that they could not do anything more complex than eat drink shit and and groom.
They were in better condition as a while. The participants were all battered. All of them had scars crewed out tails some where beaten to death. Therewas one type comparrable to an incel, it was basically a male who failed to defeat a more dominant male, and despite how mashed up this mouse was it would keep trying to score a mate. There were other types that were needy in other ways, like always needing to be accompanied, which is actually a good idea in the cesspool.
The beautiful ones simply never particapated.
They were in the upper levels, not really better conditions just more detached.
mice you're talking about were attacked by other withdrawn mice, not dominant or territorial males in that zone, the reason for the attack was a change in ambient stimuli. All the mice in that particular area were of the same sort-
Males who failed withdrew physically and
psychologically; they became very inactive and
aggregated in large pools near the centre of the
floor of the universe. From this point on they no
longer initiated interaction with their established
associates, nor did their behaviour elicit attack by
territorial males. Even so, they became charac-
terized by many wounds and much scar tissue as
a result of attacks by other withdrawn males.
The battered mice also stopped participating and while they were wounded or scarred they were still able to react to ambient stimuli, while the beautiful ones were just completely self absorbed and could not react.
Are you saying that you feel emasculated because you can't make a pass at a coworker?
I don't feel emasculated. I'm saying there is an emasculation of man happening where young guys are being taught to be betas. Unlike before, making a pass at a woman is a more serious risk to him.
Yes ever since women's rights was a thing it's less acceptable to make a vulgar pass at a woman and have other men accept or applaud you're behavior. You can still ask a woman out but I think you understand the difference between asking someone you've established good rapport with rather than a women that's pointedly ignoring you or just not interested. You should be able to read social cues as well.
As for the coworker thing. That is a more complicated subject. A man has to be a 9 or 10 or just hot to a woman before he can make a pass at her in schools or workplaces.
Honestly I'm of the mindset that the workplace is for work and there is no space to be making passes at your coworkers. Not only is it not professional but you ruin the productive atmosphere and can make it awkward.
The case im making is, there is a thinning line between harassment and establishing a meaningful connection with women these days.
It's not just women tho, as you age it gets harder and harder to make friends as an adult. Its more important to have established good relationships in your youth so that you can have a support system.
Harassment is often offensive repeated behavior, if you're being offensive as a way to establish a connection then may you need to change your approach
The need to keep traditional roles are indeed becoming rare, now that woman can earn as much or more than most males there are plenty of men becoming house husband's or woman paying child support, is this not a good thing? No long is it set upon men to be the backbone of the family, women can do their fair share.
Woman paying child support ? Maybe that's happening but literally I have never seen or heard of that in my whole life.
Fathers get custody of their children too, mother do have to pay child support and just like there deadbeat dad there are also deadbeat mom's that flake out on paying.
From my understanding women are able to put up their children for adoption if they want. Ive heard of such case where the Father had to struggle to recover their children in these cases.
Could you link them? My understanding of adoption procedures is that if dad is in the picture he gets a heads up from the court system. if he's not actively in the kids life, just as long as he's named on the birth certificate they try their best to locate and contact as they want to make the adoption as smooth as possible.
My ex is very career orientated and she did bring up having a child, and she was like "Yeah I wouldn't want to look after it when its young tho. Ill be more interested in it when its older" Which is similar to what i once said, but i just stated how i find children more interesting as they age.
Call me crazy or sexist if you will, but that's some red flag when she's eligible to take a year off with pay, and not even do this. Not to mention i suspect she would attempt to isolate me then take over the estate, and have my ass pay child support.
No deal.
Then maybe she would be up for adoption which is grate as many kids age out of the system they are often fucked over and have no mentors to help them navigate. And having a child does tend to isolate you in that you can't go out and do most of the things you used to do unless you have a very good and stable support system.
That's not a red flag, and if you don't want to pay child support invade of a separation you could always just sign away your parental rights.
