Sociopath Community

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

Turncoat said: 

Xadem said: 

If Cawk were to be shown love and compassion he'd buckle eventually, he definitely can  control himself.

He was just starting to two days before the forum shut down...

Too bad.

See, this is about you. You're acting childish right now. 

Who did you think it's about? Did you think that I removed pedophilia because of SC? I removed it, because it was on my forum. And I was led to believe SC didn't want it too, therefore I rehosted.

Cawk expects people to put in this kind of effort for him but he doesn't understand that most people don't have the desire and motivation to do that, for him.

And this is what makes it a popularity contest. 

Cawk's being banned less for being a pedo, and more for being detestable and annoying. There's other pedos on here and we haven't stopped them. 

You are an autistic fool when it comes to people. People are different and not only will, but must be handled differently.

Yet who has a degree specifically in people and spends too much time observing how the dynamics work here..? 

That is the problem, you are overthinking it, because of what you just wrote.

So he signals what he wants, and when his "demands" are not met, he lashes out from a deluded sense of justice.

...yeah his rants got a little weirder when he couldn't see if he should or shouldn't Halo Luna. 

He's actually been offline for almost a week now on all platforms I know him to be on. 

It's clear what it would take for him to stop being a shithead, but the reality is that it's far easier to just get rid of him rather than to placate him on his own terms. He believes that he's in a position to make demands. 

Easy answers don't make them right. 

Cost-effective ones are always the right awnsers.

No they aren't, and this is super easy to disprove. 

This is how pollution and fracking get support. 

Both of those can be cost-effective or not depending on the variables (like time and location).

Cost-effective ones are always the right answers if you think they are not, you miscalculated.

Your miscalculation is that you but too much value on cawk.

Good said: 

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

Turncoat said: 

Good said:

Unlike cawk, Jim has made improvements in his life.

So is this what it'd take for him to come back? 

Edvard seems convinced that he's trying to, and there's been no CP on there since. '

Edvard is never right, so it must mean cawk isnt trying to.

There's no CP on there, and Ed can be right on accident sometimes. 

There is no CP there because Cawk got banned here. He is either behaving to show off, which I believe will be temporary, or it is proof that banning him helped his behavior.

Because I do not let the forum become a cesspit of pedophilia.
I am a better leader, but I am not a leader of pedophilia accepting and enabling community. I shut down SC because I figured SC is such a community and there will never be a compromise I will accept where pedophilia stays. I was convinced it is not.

This behavior just further demonstrates that Cawk won, especially when others guilty of pedo-posting remain unaddressed. 

This is blacklisting, lets not play pretend. He got you by the feels and this is your emotional retaliation. 

If his goal was to be removed from SC, he won.

Pretend what? Cawk is not the issue. He is irrelevant, SC and mostly you were the issue. You and SC enable him and disable me. Once I had this disability removed, it was no longer a problem.

Cawk is the issue, you just don't want to give him the satisfaction. 

No, I explained it. I can expunge cawk. The issue was what he posted, but I can expunge that as well. So the issue was you and SC values.

You believe that I should not care that he posts pedophilia. But I disagree. I am not OK with pedophiles. Because they fuck children.

If I didn't host the forum, It would be different, but I am directly responsible for allowing it.

There are no others guilty of pedo-posting.

I can think of two off the top of my head, and I know it's more. 

I can't. CS isn't and Jim isn't and Waltz isn't. You just see it all in black and white. When I looked at my forum, I only saw cawk posting his pedophilia filth. Anyone else that posted that, would be treated the same. However, no one else has.

Anyone who can't make a stand is not a good leader, they are timid, indecisive, slow and have no balls. Anyone that is too swayed by the collective is also a bad leader.

So Edvard's a good leader? Luna too? 

Edvard is, Luna is not.

So you don't see the flaws in his approach anymore? 

His approach was never flawed and I've never expressed it was. His motivations and conclusions, however, are mostly retarded.
This is why he thinks we are different, yet we are not so much.

Your tolerance for pedophilia is your right(as long as I have no say in it), so you can go and make a forum accepting it, but this is not the forum for it here and I will never accept it. I do not have any issues with you running a forum. But I will never be nice to the subject of accepting that vileness anywhere, so you may as well stop trying to make me.

You're being weak, yet you sit here calling it strength. 

He hurt you. 

How did he hurt me? Especially when cawk is not the relevant factor. You and SC are. Well, were.

You let him turn this place into shit.

You are weak, SC was weak. And you enabled him and let him turn SC into Pedo Community.

You "didn't care about SC" before, and your reaction before you were talked down was a huge overreaction. 

You didn't rehost this place, Misscomm did, and you're showing clear signs of being emotionally budged by him still. You had very different behaviors before he got to you and the milling can be witnessed across a timeline. 

I do not care about SC until I hosted SC... because I am responsible for its content. With that said, I do not care about SC values on a personal level. But I do care to be honest to my word, so I abided by them.

My actions were not an overreaction at all. I thought it out long and calmly. You think its an overreaction because you are passive.

 

Actually, this place was never unhosted, to begin with, I just turned off the site.
MissC assured me that SC does not tolerate pedophilia, we shall see.

My behaviors are different because I've reevaluated the situation and I've adapted in such a way to ensure that this does not happen again.
I will eventually make a topic about it, but I plan to make a few other, "support" topics before that. These will just be my personal reflections.

[placeholder]

I do want to respond to this, it's important. I'll edit one in later. 

Good said:

Your miscalculation is that you put* too much value on cawk.

I put too much value on SC Ideals more like (not his version of them he misused that term a bunch). 

It could be someone else and it'd be a similar conflict. 

Turncoat said: 

Blanc said: 

hey i posted tips on how to help with dissociation and started a lot of great topics for people to talk about or make conversation around!! 

You rarely invite others to answer questions or contribute points, you mostly treat your topics like a blog repository. 

 

 i genuinely intend for all of it to be open game for conversation and sharing of thoughts, experiences, etc. 

Blanc said: 

Turncoat said: 

Blanc said: 

hey i posted tips on how to help with dissociation and started a lot of great topics for people to talk about or make conversation around!! 

You rarely invite others to answer questions or contribute points, you mostly treat your topics like a blog repository. 

 i genuinely intend for all of it to be open game for conversation and sharing of thoughts, experiences, etc. 

I know, but there's strategy to it. 

This was a problem during early SC actually, and we adapted towards a sort of unspoken format to invite discussion: 

1. Make a topic asking a question or announcing a subject over something you want to talk about. 
2. Give other people time to answer it. 
3. Wait some more. 
4. Answer the question yourself after they've posted answers instead of stealing the spotlight. 

A lot of people here want to talk about themselves, but they build circumstances around them instead of just throwing it all out there at once. They need to be invited in or it's TLDR from seeing it as "Me-Me-Me" in the OP. 

My problem is I’m very forgetful so I just write everything down while it’s there in my brain 

because I don’t know when it could be gone 

I may never remember to talk about it again lol or I will forget certain things even happened

Blanc said: 

My problem is I’m very forgetful so I just write everything down while it’s there in my brain 

I use notepad for that. 

Yeah i just haven’t held myself to that high of standards like as if i’m Some sort of official “content creator” 

because i’m Not getting paid and that’s kind of work. 

I just kind of let it be free flowing and raw, an open void to just throw whatever out that i want to 

and I don’t judge it or hold it to any standards. 

I thought there is sort of an appreciation for it just being raw and real because, so much isn’t now a days. I know i appreciate it when i see it. 

So that was just the approach i’d Been taking. 

It's really more about if you want to actually encourage participation or not from here on then. 

I feel very involved in every single post Blanc makes, whether she likes it or not.