Sociopath Community

yeah i made it clear to people many times that it was still under development and subject to change. 

including the aesthetic. 

i agree about the features thing... 

Turncoat said: 

"At least Luna has tits" - Edvard

It was a joke, why do you keep bringing this up like it proves anything. It must be because of your gender and body image issues that you can't laugh at a joke that contains this sort of male humor in it.

This is where you could be sitting here gloating about it "being right" to do it "your way" for how to handle "pedo talk",

Brag about what, the obvious? I, as in Mike, Luna, Inq and I, DID handle the pedo talk problem you petty snake. You are the only retard claiming otherwise. They stopped being an issue a long time before SC's demise, Cawk was being an active and interesting member as Furryboy, and there was talk about allowing Jim back in since the context stopped being what it used to be when he got banned (pedo cesspit).

Here everything took the same turn as it did before OUR measures were implemented. And Meta broke in like 3 weeks.

yet you're now on the side of the fence that supports it? 

I'm on the side of the fence that has the best chance to keep this community going without the interference of someone who knows and appreciates SHIT about what SC means, and never has. Which is NOT this side of the fence.

Cawk intends to behave in other forums except this one. He has proven capable of this as Furryboy. His trolling here pleased me immensely not because I supported the pedo talk, but because he helped bring to light some truths that were festering at the foundations of this new forum. Sometimes you need a knife to cut open the pus.

Do you even know what you want Ed?

 Just because you can't see the coherence and consistency in ALL my actions and claims doesn't mean they're not there. It means you're too caught up in your fucking petty ego issues that you continue to stay blind to the things that truly harm this community, again and again.

this is luna

Edvard said: 

Some of you people went out of your way to make Luna crack, and it took you literally years to do it. Was Luna perfect? Certainly not, and it became more and more obvious only alongside your massive efforts to destabilize her. What you didn't ask yourselves when you were waging your shitty war was: do we have a better alternative for SC? Is there anyone BETTER to host us? I'd say it took Meta just a few months to become a dozen times worse than Luna, but I'd lie, since before this forum even existed his ban on Primal betrayed a huge selfishness and lack of understanding of SC spirit.

I had 0 faith in Meta as a host for SC since the beginning, since I saw him for what he was: an unstable, emotional, frustrated individual, with delusions of grandeur and "dictatorship", while at the same time being a cringy doormat and tool for female characters who hold his virgin cock and balls.

He does NOT have what it takes to host SC, which is, first and foremost, a love for the community and a capacity to see its many positives among the disadvantages. Whoever does not do this, is NOT to be trusted as host, something I said from the start. His most recent forum kill hopefully proved to you all what what less evident from the start: this is not a good place for SC, and unless we move from here, it will wither down and die.

I for one am not willing to visit this place anymore. I'd rather go back to Luna's place, or a place hosted by Inquirer or Turncoat. Anything else is not an option for the SC I came to know and like, and if I can't have that SC, I'd rather not have this petty replacement either. I consider staying here on Meta's terms and feeding this forum as a betrayal of what used to be SC at this point, and I refuse to make such a crappy compromise out of lazy convenience and a false lack of "other options". There are always better options, and the Antisocial BoardZone is preferable to anything Meta hosts.

 "Hey guys listen !... Just listen to me !... I'm going over there now, follow me !" 

this thread made me laugh, ed the drama bitch

Luna, the kind of drama that ed brings is not good for your site. just think back to when all your drama problems started. who was there stirring the pot? edvard. ed's goal is to make as much drama as possible in a bad way. just like this thread. :)

open your eye to the real people that makes your life suck, people like edvard.

edvard is the kind of gal that can't stand when people disagree or are different than her. he gets insulted and then attacks back, this starts a never ending conflict of drama because she cant let things go.

people are starting to figure this one out. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

prediction, ed comes to antisocial, problems start happening

Ed, you really need to keep up with current events. You're at this point buying into Cawk rhetoric, which we've now seen an actual track record of. 

I registered on Luna's Forum as a way to get away from pedophilia, yet the second this place becomes anti-pedophile, it's as if she shifts her stance and then gives into the perspective of "it's futile, they'll just keep making alts" as if that's a valid excuse. Personally, I believe it's an opportunistic move. Perhaps Luna seeks to become the anti-thesis of this forum in regards to major dramatic differences. 

I don't hate Luna, this is just my perspective of what's happening. I'd rather them just stick to the core values that was agreed upon in the server, she never bothered to leave it up to a vote or ask her standing members, no, they were just allowed to exist. I see this as a betrayal of trust. 

Maybe other members were fine with it, but I'm not sure if Xena would be, I think we were both very heavily anti-pedo. It's not that I wouldn't be in a place with Cawk, I'd like him removed, but the point is, one of the first things Luna mentioned was the stance of anti-social board was to be anti-pedo. If you're not going to follow through with your word, don't bother even stating it, it makes it seem as if it's an opportunistic attempt to garner support to challenge your competition. 

As stated, I don't hate Luna, I just dislike the lack of actions taken as of recently. 

Sintetika said: 

I registered on Luna's Forum as a way to get away from pedophilia, yet the second this place becomes anti-pedophile, it's as if she shifts her stance and then gives into the perspective of "it's futile, they'll just keep making alts" as if that's a valid excuse. Personally, I believe it's an opportunistic move. Perhaps Luna seeks to become the anti-thesis of this forum in regards to major dramatic differences. 

I don't hate Luna, this is just my perspective of what's happening. I'd rather them just stick to the core values that was agreed upon in the server, she never bothered to leave it up to a vote or ask her standing members, no, they were just allowed to exist. I see this as a betrayal of trust. 

Maybe other members were fine with it, but I'm not sure if Xena would be, I think we were both very heavily anti-pedo. It's not that I wouldn't be in a place with Cawk, I'd like him removed, but the point is, one of the first things Luna mentioned was the stance of anti-social board was to be anti-pedo. If you're not going to follow through with your word, don't bother even stating it, it makes it seem as if it's an opportunistic attempt to garner support to challenge your competition. 

As stated, I don't hate Luna, I just dislike the lack of actions taken as of recently. 

 there has been no trolling pedo stuff on Luna's board. she is handling things nicely. people are getting along

except now TC will go post something, hahahaaa