Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
10 / 23 posts
0 votes

Who the fuck trusts Meta to host this forum


Posts: 749

Some of you people went out of your way to make Luna crack, and it took you literally years to do it. Was Luna perfect? Certainly not, and it became more and more obvious only alongside your massive efforts to destabilize her. What you didn't ask yourselves when you were waging your shitty war was: do we have a better alternative for SC? Is there anyone BETTER to host us? I'd say it took Meta just a few months to become a dozen times worse than Luna, but I'd lie, since before this forum even existed his ban on Primal betrayed a huge selfishness and lack of understanding of SC spirit.

I had 0 faith in Meta as a host for SC since the beginning, since I saw him for what he was: an unstable, emotional, frustrated individual, with delusions of grandeur and "dictatorship", while at the same time being a cringy doormat and tool for female characters who hold his virgin cock and balls.

He does NOT have what it takes to host SC, which is, first and foremost, a love for the community and a capacity to see its many positives among the disadvantages. Whoever does not do this, is NOT to be trusted as host, something I said from the start. His most recent forum kill hopefully proved to you all what what less evident from the start: this is not a good place for SC, and unless we move from here, it will wither down and die.

I for one am not willing to visit this place anymore. I'd rather go back to Luna's place, or a place hosted by Inquirer or Turncoat. Anything else is not an option for the SC I came to know and like, and if I can't have that SC, I'd rather not have this petty replacement either. I consider staying here on Meta's terms and feeding this forum as a betrayal of what used to be SC at this point, and I refuse to make such a crappy compromise out of lazy convenience and a false lack of "other options". There are always better options, and the Antisocial BoardZone is preferable to anything Meta hosts.

I just want other people to read this shit and be confused whether it's part of the post or not.
Posts: 749
0 votes RE: Who the fuck trusts Met...

https://antisocial.boards.zone/

Personally I intend to be more active there in a few weeks, after I'm done with smth I need to focus on happening this autumn.

I just want other people to read this shit and be confused whether it's part of the post or not.
Posts: 1937
0 votes RE: Who the fuck trusts Met...

no one cares you dramatic little faggot

2:48Spatial Mind The guy was sticking his dick in an infants mouth, it was so fucking disturbing
Posts: 678
2 votes RE: Who the fuck trusts Met...

Does anyone else find it suspicious that Edvard would rather spend his time on a forum that is 60% pedophile? That currently keeps cawk around because banning him is too much of a hassle? 

It disgusts me to no end that Edvard, our once shining glimmering example of Goodness and All That Is Righteous[pls excuse the couple of questionable times he flirted with a 17yo girl and the times hes called full grown women Little Girls as a means to flirt with them.] will now be leaving us for those that prefer to sexualize and rape small children. Maybe we should have seen the signs, after all did he not post children in bathing suits and then proceed to awkwardly sexualize them? Should we really be surprised at this turn of events?

I for one say, shame. 

Shame on us for believing that Edvard truly was against this pedophile plight.

And shame on Edvard for finally falling to his urges. 

May we learn from our mistakes.

Posts: 33384
1 votes RE: Who the fuck trusts Met...


"At least Luna has tits" - Edvard


It's what's here in the meantime, and I'm surprised you'd be against Meta enforcing an approach you were primarily doing otherwise in a similar style. Luna meanwhile recognizes that the pedo content cannot be controlled and has already admitted to it being hopeless with the state her current website is in. 

This is where you could be sitting here gloating about it "being right" to do it "your way" for how to handle "pedo talk", yet you're now on the side of the fence that supports it? 

Do you even know what you want Ed? 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 8/8/2019 7:46:38 PM
Posts: 9413
0 votes RE: Who the fuck trusts Met...

i feel like this is like a huge family fued 

 

and i'm that cool aunt that you run to when your parents are fighting 

 

(aka my forum)

 

Posted Image

Posts: 33384
0 votes RE: Who the fuck trusts Met...

Actually yeah, another note, what was your opinion of Blanc's forum Ed?

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 9413
0 votes RE: Who the fuck trusts Met...

Posted Image

me watching everyone argue when i already proposed a perfectly good solution that was fine 

Posts: 9413
1 votes RE: Who the fuck trusts Met...

Actually yeah, another note, what was your opinion of Blanc's forum Ed?

 the only mistake i made was trusting jim.

Posts: 33384
0 votes RE: Who the fuck trusts Met...
Blanc said: 

Posted Image

me watching everyone argue when i already proposed a perfectly good solution that was fine 

I know it sounds silly, but half of what worked against it was it's aesthetic. 

It had some functions this forum didn't even have that were actually pretty nice. 

the only mistake i made was trusting jim.

Yeah... even Cawk didn't want it down. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 8/8/2019 7:58:55 PM
10 / 23 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.