Sociopath Community

Cawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Cawk said: 

---

Cawk said:

If there was anyone twisted like me here, I'd actually try to be friends with them, and as result, contribute to the site better.

...is this some sort of existential loneliness stemming from when you "realized" that Jim is "just some old cast normie like the rest of 'em"? 

No.

Hm, alright. 

The loneliness angle is new though, you always liked to brag in another's stead. Now that you're this "Big Alfa Dawg" or whatever you realize it's lonely at the top and that no one around here is appreciating what you're doing (beyond some of the subtleties from a few who bothered to try to read into you). 

When Jim was around, he even enabled some of your pettier behavior, and with him gone you still have the same desires with no one to validate it for you.

...

Jim's validation for what I do was never the fuel for it, you've been reading me wrong.

Remember when I told you that I don't rely on 1 on 1 supply?

You rebuke us because you feel rebuked, but you feel it before it's the reality so instead you end up in a strangely defensive self-fulfilling prophecy. 

I'm extremely good at reading people. Don't buy into Alena's story.

With enough users like that, the place wouldn't be "overwhelmed by some asshole that aims to take advantage of those freedoms." as Turncoat described me. 

...yeah, it'd be more overwhelmed, by a group of them instead, all backing each other up and patting each other on the back for making people leave like it was before. 

I mostly try to keep that lot around to see if they'll come around and be normal users. Many of them do, so chances have proven worth giving in the past, but there's a point where to do nothing is no longer an option. 

If there really were more users like me, the normies would likely end up fucking off back to Loona's and the thick skinned ones like me would stay.

What you describe as overwhelming would become the norm. It is just very noticeable currently when there's users who post topics about kittens and then when I post topics.

What you're talking about is something this place has never been

Instead it had prideful, middle aged losers larping, threatening each other, of which nothing ever came out of any instances.

My vision is better. 

So build your own place that more suits your vision instead of ours. 

I'm not going to sit here and say that there's no feelings going on whatsoever, that'd be ridiculous self-denial. I'm all for freedom of expression, but making a mess stops others from having their room to express other than through fighting fire with fire. I want it to work and at points it feels like you're working against me working for you, so I'm bound to have some feelings on the matter. 

I'm definitely not with you, but I expect you to uphold the site principles.

Your views on what those are seem to shift around. I'll be upholding the site principles as I have been, but how you and I see it sometimes clash. 

Turncoat said: 

Cawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Cawk said: 

---

Cawk said:

If there was anyone twisted like me here, I'd actually try to be friends with them, and as result, contribute to the site better.

...is this some sort of existential loneliness stemming from when you "realized" that Jim is "just some old cast normie like the rest of 'em"? 

No.

Hm, alright. 

The loneliness angle is new though, you always liked to brag in another's stead. Now that you're this "Big Alfa Dawg" or whatever you realize it's lonely at the top and that no one around here is appreciating what you're doing (beyond some of the subtleties from a few who bothered to try to read into you). 

When Jim was around, he even enabled some of your pettier behavior, and with him gone you still have the same desires with no one to validate it for you.

...

Jim's validation for what I do was never the fuel for it, you've been reading me wrong.

Remember when I told you that I don't rely on 1 on 1 supply?

I have trouble believing the above. 

You rebuke us because you feel rebuked, but you feel it before it's the reality so instead you end up in a strangely defensive self-fulfilling prophecy. 

I'm extremely good at reading people. Don't buy into Alena's story.

Yeah... this was my own conclusion. 

Paranoid or otherwise anxious people tend to be the better people readers (which is why some abuse victims can acquire it too), but it has the risk of being infected by their own insecurity when it starts to directly relate towards them. The show "Lie to Me" really liked to play with that for drama, showing once skilled readers getting it really wrong because "feelings". 

With enough users like that, the place wouldn't be "overwhelmed by some asshole that aims to take advantage of those freedoms." as Turncoat described me. 

...yeah, it'd be more overwhelmed, by a group of them instead, all backing each other up and patting each other on the back for making people leave like it was before. 

I mostly try to keep that lot around to see if they'll come around and be normal users. Many of them do, so chances have proven worth giving in the past, but there's a point where to do nothing is no longer an option. 

If there really were more users like me, the normies would likely end up fucking off back to Loona's and the thick skinned ones like me would stay.

What you describe as overwhelming would become the norm. It is just very noticeable currently when there's users who post topics about kittens and then when I post topics.

What you're talking about is something this place has never been

Instead it had prideful, middle aged losers larping, threatening each other, of which nothing ever came out of any instances.

My vision is better. 

So build your own place that more suits your vision instead of ours.

I am.

Cawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Cawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Cawk said: 

---

Cawk said:

If there was anyone twisted like me here, I'd actually try to be friends with them, and as result, contribute to the site better.

...is this some sort of existential loneliness stemming from when you "realized" that Jim is "just some old cast normie like the rest of 'em"? 

No.

Hm, alright. 

The loneliness angle is new though, you always liked to brag in another's stead. Now that you're this "Big Alfa Dawg" or whatever you realize it's lonely at the top and that no one around here is appreciating what you're doing (beyond some of the subtleties from a few who bothered to try to read into you). 

When Jim was around, he even enabled some of your pettier behavior, and with him gone you still have the same desires with no one to validate it for you.

...

Jim's validation for what I do was never the fuel for it, you've been reading me wrong.

Remember when I told you that I don't rely on 1 on 1 supply?

I have trouble believing the above. 

You are literally schizophrenic.

You rebuke us because you feel rebuked, but you feel it before it's the reality so instead you end up in a strangely defensive self-fulfilling prophecy. 

I'm extremely good at reading people. Don't buy into Alena's story.

Yeah... this was my own conclusion. 

Paranoid or otherwise anxious people tend to be the better people readers (which is why some abuse victims can acquire it too), but it has the risk of being infected by their own insecurity when it starts to directly relate towards them. The show "Lie to Me" really liked to play with that for drama, showing once skilled readers getting it really wrong because "feelings". 

What's your point?

The only person I've ever fucked over because I anticipated malice from them is Alena. My paranoia is controlled.

Coming here and not being myself would be a waste of time to me. As nobody here really interests me as person, the only purpose they serve is to hand me over supply.

So build your own place that more suits your vision instead of ours.

I am.

I meant from scratch. 

Doing it here wouldn't be sustainable to you, you'd need to be the admin yourself to make sure that the admin (you) does not abuse it's power or otherwise pander to a userbase you've deemed beneath you. 

Turncoat said: 

Cawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Cawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Cawk said: 

---

Cawk said:

If there was anyone twisted like me here, I'd actually try to be friends with them, and as result, contribute to the site better.

...is this some sort of existential loneliness stemming from when you "realized" that Jim is "just some old cast normie like the rest of 'em"? 

No.

Hm, alright. 

The loneliness angle is new though, you always liked to brag in another's stead. Now that you're this "Big Alfa Dawg" or whatever you realize it's lonely at the top and that no one around here is appreciating what you're doing (beyond some of the subtleties from a few who bothered to try to read into you). 

When Jim was around, he even enabled some of your pettier behavior, and with him gone you still have the same desires with no one to validate it for you.

...

Jim's validation for what I do was never the fuel for it, you've been reading me wrong.

Remember when I told you that I don't rely on 1 on 1 supply?

I have trouble believing the above. 

You are literally schizophrenic.

What's your point? 

You rebuke us because you feel rebuked, but you feel it before it's the reality so instead you end up in a strangely defensive self-fulfilling prophecy. 

I'm extremely good at reading people. Don't buy into Alena's story.

Yeah... this was my own conclusion. 

Paranoid or otherwise anxious people tend to be the better people readers (which is why some abuse victims can acquire it too), but it has the risk of being infected by their own insecurity when it starts to directly relate towards them. The show "Lie to Me" really liked to play with that for drama, showing once skilled readers getting it really wrong because "feelings". 

What's your point?

The only person I've ever fucked over because I anticipated malice from them is Alena. My paranoia is controlled.

Coming here and not being myself would be a waste of time to me. As nobody here really interests me as person, the only purpose they serve is to hand me over supply.

How well do you figure people actually know themselves? 

So build your own place that more suits your vision instead of ours.

I am.

I meant from scratch. 

Doing it here wouldn't be sustainable to you, you'd need to be the admin yourself to make sure that the admin (you) does not abuse it's power or otherwise pander to a userbase you've deemed beneath you. 

 You're afraid people will run back to Luna's.

Cawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Cawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Cawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Cawk said: 

No.

Hm, alright. 

The loneliness angle is new though, you always liked to brag in another's stead. Now that you're this "Big Alfa Dawg" or whatever you realize it's lonely at the top and that no one around here is appreciating what you're doing (beyond some of the subtleties from a few who bothered to try to read into you). 

When Jim was around, he even enabled some of your pettier behavior, and with him gone you still have the same desires with no one to validate it for you.

...

Jim's validation for what I do was never the fuel for it, you've been reading me wrong.

Remember when I told you that I don't rely on 1 on 1 supply?

I have trouble believing the above. 

You are literally schizophrenic.

What's your point? 

Have a guess.

Schizophrenia is a chronic, severe mental disorder that affects the way a person thinks, acts, expresses emotions, perceives reality, and relates to others. Though schizophrenia isn’t as common as other major mental illnesses, it can be the most chronic and disabling.

You rebuke us because you feel rebuked, but you feel it before it's the reality so instead you end up in a strangely defensive self-fulfilling prophecy. 

I'm extremely good at reading people. Don't buy into Alena's story.

Yeah... this was my own conclusion. 

Paranoid or otherwise anxious people tend to be the better people readers (which is why some abuse victims can acquire it too), but it has the risk of being infected by their own insecurity when it starts to directly relate towards them. The show "Lie to Me" really liked to play with that for drama, showing once skilled readers getting it really wrong because "feelings". 

What's your point?

The only person I've ever fucked over because I anticipated malice from them is Alena. My paranoia is controlled.

Coming here and not being myself would be a waste of time to me. As nobody here really interests me as person, the only purpose they serve is to hand me over supply.

How well do you figure people actually know themselves? 

Are you implying I don't know myself?

So build your own place that more suits your vision instead of ours.

I am.

I meant from scratch. 

Doing it here wouldn't be sustainable to you, you'd need to be the admin yourself to make sure that the admin (you) does not abuse it's power or otherwise pander to a userbase you've deemed beneath you. 

 You're afraid people will run back to Luna's.

Meta won't host a forum just for you, he's made that more than clear today over both sensible and personal reasonings. You trying to make a forum for yourself can't work within these confines, they just can't. 

The only way it would work is if you hosted it, you'd have complete control, you could scour the net for like minds to draw into your little web, and you'd have what you're after. You won't find it here, you'll never have found it here, as that's never who these people were or what they were about, not even back when they were being pretend badasses. 

It just doesn't make sense. Wanting to kill the place over the perceived deaths of it's ideals is something people can fall behind when it's otherwise the case, but wanting to kick everyone out who's not like yourself is highly unsustainable if you aren't the one at the helm inviting like-minded people yourself. 

He won't stop. And y'all are dumb for not ridding 1 member who pushes multiple members away.

Turncoat said:MissCommunication said:

I'm rarely here cos I have no interest in hanging out on a pedo cesspit. It's boring.

You and Ed are seriously dramatic.

I'm not being dramatic. I have no interest in spending time where pedos hang. They don't interest me. You're being dramatic by whining that any enforcement related to common sense and the majority's wishes will destroy SC. It won't.

I say this not because I'm not working on it but because you see a few "ordering a child online" posts and you two get your panties in a twist.

Why do you always try to twist the narrative to suit your agenda? If it was just "a few "ordering child online" posts" then this thread wouldn't exist.

You claim you want discussion but in reality you try to shut it down when people don't share your views. You dismiss people. 

And how exactly are you 'working on it'? By using your master manipulation skills to win cawk over? lol You're not as skilled as you think, TC. 

 

We went through this 2 years ago.

You have invalidated your opinion through excessive generalizing. I get the sentiments behind it and I see the group wanting action, but it must be the right action, not merely action at all, otherwise we might as well just go back to Ed. It's a slippery slope, and it's our responsibility to keep the boat from rocking over as a result of it. 

You attack Ed cos he pisses people off and you think that will grow your favour rather than be honest about what happened. Ed cleaned SC up and users came back. Even Cawk and Jim came back lol. You refuse to accept that because it hurts your ego and counters your views. 

Edit: and I thought we had a no CP policy? You were banned if you post it. Just saying it was on another account is retarded if we know who did it.

If we're going to be that strict about it, then we need to be banning Alena on sight, and for that matter we'll need to keep Jim off of our forum too. He posted a single instance of it on here when he was mad about something, but letting that one offense slide confused him and immediately turned him back into "one of us". 

I don't know why lena gave cawk her account but she didn't post it. Jim is dead lol so he's moot for now. CP is illegal. How many chances do you think we need to give? 

I was hoping Cawk would come around, and at this point even his current last shot in line with these adjustments many would argue is me being too generous, but the occasional peace-time or lenient moment has many times been how we've converted problems into users. 

You're naive. He became more of a user on old SC when his hands were tied.

Misscommunication said:

I'm not being dramatic. I have no interest in spending time where pedos hang. They don't interest me.

Who's "they"? We've got one, and he's being handled. 

And how exactly are you 'working on it'?

If you actually read the topic, you'd know. 

Turncoat said: 

Cawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Cawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Cawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Cawk said: 

No.

Hm, alright. 

The loneliness angle is new though, you always liked to brag in another's stead. Now that you're this "Big Alfa Dawg" or whatever you realize it's lonely at the top and that no one around here is appreciating what you're doing (beyond some of the subtleties from a few who bothered to try to read into you). 

When Jim was around, he even enabled some of your pettier behavior, and with him gone you still have the same desires with no one to validate it for you.

...

Jim's validation for what I do was never the fuel for it, you've been reading me wrong.

Remember when I told you that I don't rely on 1 on 1 supply?

I have trouble believing the above. 

You are literally schizophrenic.

What's your point? 

Have a guess.

Schizophrenia is a chronic, severe mental disorder that affects the way a person thinks, acts, expresses emotions, perceives reality, and relates to others. Though schizophrenia isn’t as common as other major mental illnesses, it can be the most chronic and disabling.

Would you say my history with trying to understand other people is flawed as well, or does my schizophrenia only extend towards you?

Does this condition also nullify my life experiences in the subject of people that I've otherwise gone at length about? 

I'm apparently functional within my strange habits to be on paper as "Schizoaffective", but from my own understanding I'd still call it like it is: Paranoid Schizophrenia. Schizoaffective is supposed to only enter psychosis when their emotions flare too loudly, while a Schizophrenic is supposed to be nutty from the getgo with less mood swinginess in relation to the psychosis itself. Under-reporting the weirder stuff's probably a factor. 

From within many disorders come strange gifts through their exaggerations. Much of our best talent in history has stemmed from disorders, if not from families that had it in their genetics in general. 

You rebuke us because you feel rebuked, but you feel it before it's the reality so instead you end up in a strangely defensive self-fulfilling prophecy. 

I'm extremely good at reading people. Don't buy into Alena's story.

Yeah... this was my own conclusion. 

Paranoid or otherwise anxious people tend to be the better people readers (which is why some abuse victims can acquire it too), but it has the risk of being infected by their own insecurity when it starts to directly relate towards them. The show "Lie to Me" really liked to play with that for drama, showing once skilled readers getting it really wrong because "feelings". 

What's your point?

The only person I've ever fucked over because I anticipated malice from them is Alena. My paranoia is controlled.

Coming here and not being myself would be a waste of time to me. As nobody here really interests me as person, the only purpose they serve is to hand me over supply.

How well do you figure people actually know themselves? 

Are you implying I don't know myself?

I'd go as far as to say that most people don't, emphasized through tons of time I've wasted researching others ideas on the matter. 

It's not me saying "Cawk, you don't know yourself.", it's closer to "Cawk, who does know themselves?". It's impersonal and I largely see it apply to most people, and how yours plays out appears as I've narrated it to me. 

Turncoat said: 

Misscommunication said:

I'm not being dramatic. I have no interest in spending time where pedos hang. They don't interest me.

Who's "they"? We've got one, and he's being handled. 

Obviously he's not being handled well enough, as this entire thread confirms it.

Cawk in chat said:

10:18 Cawk: the only thing thats dead is my cock
10:18 Cawk: from not having fucked a child recently

At this point, TC, it's just you fighting to keep Cawk's pedo presence here. His stubborness to make this crap a common presence here is too strong to apply in his case, yet again, the "wait and see" approach. Everyone here except you have reached this conclusion.

It is up to GOOD to finally make Cawk's ban official. It is quite rare that so many people in this community agree on something, and strongly enough that they ACTIVELY COMMENT on it. It is only YOU now who struggle against a more forceful way to stop this disgusting behavior that we have to put up with, and YOU are not the community or that important in it to have any veto power.