Sociopath Community

Buttered Toast said: 

Being Delora the whole time is actually pretty funny.

...I mean this "leggasucks" puppet.  Not just *being Delora*.  (But perhaps it is.)

 Easily my favorite outcome. Though if it were Legga that too would be funny as hell. The only thing is if it is Legga, we'll never get the answer in this lifetime.  

It has to be someone offended by Legga diagnosing them, the worst being belittled as a child. And yes Legga, you will say you never meant any harm and move on while the subject you diagnosed remains insulted. 

The Leggasucks puppet hands out likes and dislikes. The puppetmaster is enjoying themselves. 

Spatial Mind said: 

Turncoat said: 

Jada said: 

 

What you mean after SC2 was nuked?

True, I want this forum to shut down.

More like you want to rob the fun from those who enjoy it here so they leave, because you can't make yourself do it. If there is no forum, then there is nothing to leave. 

Frankly though, it's rude, and these false claims being made about me are burning what few bridges we had left. It works for the sake of argument with other people but I have to witness you saying that shit when I know otherwise. 

You should reconsider what you're doing if you ask me. I understand why you won't surrender when this committed to the bit but dragging other people into it means they get to respond to it. 

 So basically Legga is lying to me.  

I know he's fabricating the past. And I knew it would only be a matter of time before you see what he's saying then invalidate his claims.

Why Legga's claim doesn't add up from my perspective.

- You and Luna had a bit of a fallout just before and after time of SC's destruction.

It seems Legga was hoping you'd not want to be seen as forgetful, he figured you'd go along with his false claim that you can authenticate his DM with Luna, at a time where you and Luna were at one another's throats and you were in exile. 

But really, you couldn't possibly do that. 

This is the one thing I'm certain about, the rest is speculative, and Legga's plausibility doesn't seem to stick at this point.

In the other thread his sentiment is that I'm a deceiver and 2 faced while I inch toward the truth.

.

.

.

While I'm uncertain of who the puppet is, TC isn't on the suspect list. 

It wasn't in DM. It was in the public chat. And yes TC is guaranteed to vouch for me, while you play cat mask and tarnish my good name. 

The fact that he doesnt validate it is another evidence pointing towards him being the puppet. Why would he not validate what he knows?

..Given how invested and biased you are, im starting to think youre cosharing the puppet account with TC.

Jada said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Turncoat said: 

More like you want to rob the fun from those who enjoy it here so they leave, because you can't make yourself do it. If there is no forum, then there is nothing to leave. 

Frankly though, it's rude, and these false claims being made about me are burning what few bridges we had left. It works for the sake of argument with other people but I have to witness you saying that shit when I know otherwise. 

You should reconsider what you're doing if you ask me. I understand why you won't surrender when this committed to the bit but dragging other people into it means they get to respond to it. 

 So basically Legga is lying to me.  

I know he's fabricating the past. And I knew it would only be a matter of time before you see what he's saying then invalidate his claims.

Why Legga's claim doesn't add up from my perspective.

- You and Luna had a bit of a fallout just before and after time of SC's destruction.

It seems Legga was hoping you'd not want to be seen as forgetful, he figured you'd go along with his false claim that you can authenticate his DM with Luna, at a time where you and Luna were at one another's throats and you were in exile. 

But really, you couldn't possibly do that. 

This is the one thing I'm certain about, the rest is speculative, and Legga's plausibility doesn't seem to stick at this point.

In the other thread his sentiment is that I'm a deceiver and 2 faced while I inch toward the truth.

.

.

.

While I'm uncertain of who the puppet is, TC isn't on the suspect list. 

It wasn't in DM. It was in the public chat. And yes TC is guaranteed to vouch for me, while you play cat mask and tarnish my good name. 

The fact that he doesnt validate it is another evidence pointing towards him being the puppet. Why would he not validate what he knows?

First of all, on that day you wouldn't have been able to identify TC, as he was being banned on sight. TC was only identifiable when he'd dox up me and my family, post phone numbers of businesses and any listing of anyone with the same last name as me.

Luna implemented an email registration into the forum to slow TC from returning with new alts multiple times a day. 

Now I'm supposed to believe TC was chilling right there in public chat with Luna while you were the straw that broke the camel's back.

Y'know. If Luna killed the forum mid conversation with you, it means she isn't arsed if you're disappointed with her.

..Given how invested and biased you are, im starting to think youre cosharing the puppet account with TC.

 Is that so.

I'm invested cause there's nothing better to do here and I'm starting to have fun.

Yes I don't think you're all there and don't recognize you as a higher intelligence, and I never needed to use a puppet to be vocal about it.

You had Nate, Delora and Dragoon. Maybe BT, seeing you as bright. Not sure if they see you that way anymore. Dragoon and Nate are done with that, and I know the exact time and reasoning where you lost them both. 

You're projecting your own value judgments onto what I'm saying. I can think Jada is intelligent without finding him likable, agreeable, or especially insightful. Intelligence doesn't erase normative or reactionary biases, and I see a lot of the same assumptions in TC, Jada, and you. A lot of those assumptions also seem increasingly irrelevant because people care less about the social status markers they're built around. Jada repeatedly insisting that I must be much younger than I am is a good example.

That's also why I think calling intelligence "brightness" is antiquated. Intelligence doesn't make someone inherently more perceptive, enlightened, or correct. Intelligent people can still reason from false assumptions, repeat conventional biases, and defend systems that disadvantage other people.