Sociopath Community

Jada said: 

Case in point then, AI posts are more attractive. 

 The hearing impaired use hearing aids. Sprained ankle, a crutch or two. For those who cannot walk, the wheelchair. The worse our vision, the thicker the glasses. Children learn how to ride with training wheels. 

While Dragoon uses Ai as an aid, for you it's going to be all cosmetics.

Not trying to be a bigot or anything, but you are a different kind of queer. You like an absorber, absorbing that which you envy, like the woman. Now it's the machine. you want that power. You'll be fabulous but stay mindful of who the master is if you want to merge with it in anyway. Not me though. Ai is for work, and when I look back at this point in time, like to see at least something I made. I can read the old forum next to the meatspin, and I'm glad I'm not looking back at Ai talking for me.     

So your point is that Dragoon is mentally disabled and therefore needs AI to substitute for his brain. That's kind of rude.

I thought I was the arrogant one here, looking down on people's intellect.

Honestly, from where Im standing you all look mentally disabled, I barely see any difference.

Jada said: 

Police are an issue based on politics.

Firemen fight fires, which is apolitical but based on civil society funding them.

Physicists are based on education, and I'd hope that'd remain apolitcal.

Criminal Lawyers are corrupt beyond belief, as that's part of their field and they want to win.

Im surprised by how little faith you have in criminal lawyers and police. I think there are good people out there. Whats your view of where the US is headed extrapolate 20 years?

 

Every police Ive ever met has been a decent guy. Same with criminal lawyers, especially the women lawyers, though I imagine its a draining job, too much negativity.

I wonder how much of this is you being in a bad headspace. Ive seen a more optimistic version of you in the past.

 

Yes. We're all collectively poor enough to be that guy these days.

What do you think is the fix? 

I wouldve thought better people being promoted to the upper echelons of society. Despite how much humanity has fucked up I think we got some things right. We're not raping and killing each other every day at least, and we have good hygiene, USA has shit food and a sugar epidemic but nobody is starving.

I think we should fix this poverty thing and global warming though. We totally can, I think its a game theory problem.

 

But then it won't be me, and the audience will notice unless they're totally narcissistic or some shit.

You can train the AI based on your past posts so it mimics your style. 

Honeatly if I switched to AI I doubt anyone would notice. I already speak like a bot, its kind of my thing.

 Disenfranchisement is the most common source of poverty. Take the ozone layer as an invisible immovable framework of Absolute Space™ which is another term for materialization at the gates via creation of artificial unchanging immutable material bodies—ozone layers; Free material interacts within these layers. Conceptualized as unobservable multiplication and dispersion of internal frames across the "planet" which can otherwise be conveyed as a solar dissolution of irradiating solutions mandelbrots into the planet into 2 types of poverty: stagnating mandelbrots and active mandelbrots into interpreting bodies composed as composite "atoms." "Atoms" continually practice stochastic rumspringa in order to maintain bodies of ancient materializations of various civilizations composed of nuclear fusion-fission rumspringa polatirites.  Amoung Amish modern civilizations, beard disenfranchisement practices the act of resulting impoverishment consequentially entailing in rumspringa of the collective into varying zones of fractals as ontological carnivorous compartments corresponding to and organizing between stagnating and active mandlebots of materialism-balancing pragmatics, otherwise known as breakaway dialectical egalitarianism which poses several problems in and of itself entailing generalized notions of concrete building blocks of abstraction connecting systems with Abstract Space.™ This is called the Oppenheimer problem. The stagnant mandlebots of shadows of the victims of Nuclear Holodomors imprinted as shadows directionally emanating from the core of the explosions into exterior facing architectural exit/entrance walls of varying degrees and proximities of decay from the origin of the focal point of the irradiating zone of desolation  as bodies fusing with the architecture as shadowing imprints otherwise known as "mirroring" in sociology. Creating a zone of organizing densities and intensities delienated with faciality as structural paralogism intermingling origin and organization. An example of this is the OPLAN 8010 and SIOP as material abstraction for uranium abstraction updating practices. Chinas underground Great Wall and the Great Fire Wall of China are both active mandlebrot focal points of control. The underground Great Wall is an architectural subterrain project consisting of thousands of miles of deeply buried tunnels, large enough to fit active or stagnating transmission mandlebrots of various bodies of "atoms" sturcturized as carniverous rumspringa collectives of varying levels of technology apparatus organizations through cavernous densities. 

Jada said: 

So your point is that Dragoon is mentally disabled and therefore needs AI to substitute for his brain. That's kind of rude.

Personal opinions won't erase actual results and the truth in the matter.

All the while being a dick Ai makes him better at it.

I thought I was the arrogant one here, looking down on people's intellect.

Honestly, from where Im standing you all look mentally disabled, I barely see any difference.

 I think you're vexed about the general outlook of using Ai to socialize, and of us all you were the one behind on this.

You want to use it, so use it. It might steer you into more appeal like it does with disturbing personas, and you can carry on claiming to be the best and brightest all you want.

As Dragoon would say, that's an ad hominem.

Out of all of us Im arguably the most familiar with AI and have used it the longest. 

I recall saying you should try Grok and you said you use copilot. Someone suggested you use it for work and you were all, oh okay. That could've only happened within the past 3 years.   

Actually it was Claude and Cursor, which you said you have but your students use those.

No I said I used copilot before chatgpt became a thing and it was mostly places like Flatiron Institute and some industries that started using LLMs for more serious work. 

Spatial Mind said: 

spend a great deal of time making the conversation about your character. While Dragoon uses Ai as an aid, for you it's going to be all cosmetics. All the while being a dick Ai makes him better at it.

That’s actually what you’re doing, not me. I’m responding to your pattern of degrading, judging, and personally attacking ("having a meltdown" as you've accused me of) people, then accusing others of doing the same. It may seem repetitive to you, but that's because you refuse to acknowledge your own repetitive way of attacking people again and again until you can make them look as bad as possible.

Pointing out that pattern isn’t “insecurity.” If anything, repeatedly using that word to dismiss criticism sounds like projection. It’s criticism. The same applies when I criticize the logic and consequences of your positions, including what I see as keeping people stuck in Samsara. You make criticism of your arguments into a criticism of you personally, then accuse me of doing exactly that, which is contradictory. You also tend to deny or minimize previous positions when inconvenient, then selectively invoke them when useful, forcing others to reconstruct the context while you control what gets acknowledged. So yeah people probably do feel insecure interacting with you for too long because you are constantly using attrition to feel more secure about yourself but degrading others.

I mean in those same post you are obsessed with talking about my character, calling me a dick and trying to degrade me, that's literally making it about my character while I dissect your logic. 

Jada said:

Case in point then, AI posts are more attractive. So your point is that Dragoon is mentally disabled and therefore needs AI to substitute for his brain. That's kind of rude. I thought I was the arrogant one here, looking down on people's intellect.

I do think however that AI works better for me because I use it with critical thinking to hone posts, even if Spatial wants to phrase in the most degrading way he can while ironically accusing me of making conversations about his character, when almost all I see from him is trying to degrade others and acting like that insecurity is some truth that it's not. AI is derivative so it's not very good for just making more substantive posts. 

Jada said: 

No I said I used copilot before chatgpt became a thing and it was mostly places like Flatiron Institute and some industries that started using LLMs for more serious work. 

 ChatGPT older than Copilot though.

Anything else ?