Sociopath Community

Dragoonback said: 

Maninist said:

Yes. But it's not out of spite. Okay. Yes I still claim. Never created anything here tbh. Everything I wrote here can be researched. Remember that time when I said you need to have a higher degree of intelligence when dealing with me? Not putting you down, but I'm seeking a forward conversation in the same way a grade one student is no good to a university professor.

Whether it comes from spite is irrelevant. I criticized the reasoning, not your emotional motive. Saying that your claims “can be researched” is also not evidence.

So why don't you look into it yourself while the information is at your fingertips ?

Oh right. You don't really want to know.

.

.

.

My message to Joshua remains the same. There are the people I trigger, and the people I don't. 

Spatial Mind said: 

So why don't you look into it yourself while the information is at your fingertips ? Oh right. You don't really want to know. My message to Joshua remains the same. There are the people I trigger, and the people I don't. 

The burden is on the person making the claim. “You can research it yourself” is not evidence, especially when you have not clearly stated what evidence supposedly supports your conclusion. And whether you “trigger” people is irrelevant. Provoking a reaction does not make your claims true or your reasoning sound.

The Spatial Mind topic from Dex got the most traffic among the Dex topics, he must be doing something right. 

Dragoonback said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

So why don't you look into it yourself while the information is at your fingertips ? Oh right. You don't really want to know. My message to Joshua remains the same. There are the people I trigger, and the people I don't. 

The burden is on the person making the claim. “You can research it yourself” is not evidence, especially when you have not clearly stated what evidence supposedly supports your conclusion. And whether you “trigger” people is irrelevant. Provoking a reaction does not make your claims true or your reasoning sound.

 You're living proof of one claim. Always out to get me.

Also my inherent policy prohibits me from striking first as maintaining moral highground is important. 

Turncoat said: 

The Spatial Mind topic from Dex got the most traffic among the Dex topics, he must be doing something right. 

 It's an illusion. I just decided to entertain the kid for awhile.

Maninist said: 

You're living proof of one claim. Always out to get me.

Also my inherent policy prohibits me from striking first as maintaining moral highground is important. 

This is not mainly about you. I am criticizing the worldview you promote: creating people without consent, imposing need, suffering, labor, vulnerability, and death on them, then calling it good or spiritually meaningful. My criticism would remain even if you were removed from the discussion. Turning it into a story about my motives avoids the actual issue. You are incidental to the argument. I reject the pro-birth, pro-exploitation ideas themselves.

Your claim that you never strike first is false. You have threatened me and repeatedly promoted violence as a way to force compliance. That is not merely defensive conduct. It also reveals how you excuse your aggression: you define yourself as the responder, then classify criticism or disobedience as the first attack. That lets you threaten people while still imagining that you never initiated anything.

Dragoonback said: 

Maninist said: 

You're living proof of one claim. Always out to get me.

Also my inherent policy prohibits me from striking first as maintaining moral highground is important. 

This is not mainly about you. I am criticizing the worldview you promote: creating people without consent, imposing need, suffering, labor, vulnerability, and death on them, then calling it good or spiritually meaningful. My criticism would remain even if you were removed from the discussion. Turning it into a story about my motives avoids the actual issue. You are incidental to the argument. I reject the pro-birth, pro-exploitation ideas themselves.

We were talking, this thread. 

All that other stuff, you should complain in your Spatial Mind's Appeal thread. 

Your claim that you never strike first is false. You have threatened me and repeatedly promoted violence as a way to force compliance.

False. You did say you'd crush me. In turn I'd slap you silly.

I also like to reminded the (white) people to also beat their kids.

That is not merely defensive conduct. It also reveals how you excuse your aggression: you define yourself as the responder, then classify criticism or disobedience as the first attack. That lets you threaten people while still imagining that you never initiated anything.

 This time all I did was say I have many names, and I'm not Satan.

If we go back in history. It's you striking first every time. Then you go apeshit when you get choked out.

Word up.

Spatial Mind said:

We were talking, this thread. All that other stuff, you should complain in your Spatial Mind's Appeal thread. False. You did say you'd crush me. In turn I'd slap you silly. I also like to remind the (white) people to also beat their kids. This time all I did was say I have many names, and I'm not Satan. If we go back in history. It's you striking first every time. Then you go apeshit when you get choked out. Word up.

You stated “never striking first” as a general policy, so your conduct elsewhere is relevant. Telling me to move that criticism to another thread is just a deflection. I said I would crush you after you had already threatened me, so you are reversing the chronology. You also promote beating children while claiming moral high ground. Your policy only works because you redefine criticism or retaliation as the first attack, then excuse your own aggression as defensive.

Dragoonback said: 

Spatial Mind said:

We were talking, this thread. All that other stuff, you should complain in your Spatial Mind's Appeal thread. False. You did say you'd crush me. In turn I'd slap you silly. I also like to remind the (white) people to also beat their kids. This time all I did was say I have many names, and I'm not Satan. If we go back in history. It's you striking first every time. Then you go apeshit when you get choked out. Word up.

You stated “never striking first” as a general policy, so your conduct elsewhere is relevant.

I did multiple times since 2012. Even in 2026.

I'm God fearing.

Telling me to move that criticism to another thread is just a deflection. I said I would crush you after you had already threatened me, so you are reversing the chronology. You also promote beating children while claiming moral high ground. Your policy only works because you redefine criticism or retaliation as the first attack, then excuse your own aggression as defensive.

 Well. You're making it about other things. Trying to justify attacking me. 

Honestly you never had a good reason to.

Maninist said: 

I did multiple times since 2012. Even in 2026. I'm God fearing. You're making it about other things. Trying to justify attacking me. Honestly you never had a good reason to.

Repeating that you have followed this policy since 2012 does not prove it, and being “God fearing” is irrelevant. I was criticizing your ideas, not inventing a personal reason to attack you. You have also initiated hostility and threatened me before.