Sociopath Community

Spatial Mind said: 

It amazes me how you even have something to say. Not going to read all that. It's too long and I can't spend too much time reading the same old "This is not, that is not". All you have is doubt and bitterness, and while we cannot help but judge others, no one in their right mind would want to be judged the way I'm judging you. Thanks for boosting my sense of self worth, and you're welcome for posting evidence. 

You admit you did not read the argument, then immediately claim to know what it contains and why I wrote it. That is not judgment based on evidence. It is the same fixed narrative you apply regardless of what I actually say. “It is too long” is a valid reason not to continue, but it is not a rebuttal. Neither are vague labels such as doubt, bitterness, or being outside my “right mind.” Your remark about boosting your self-worth is revealing. You are treating the exchange as personal validation rather than an attempt to establish what happened. And the evidence you posted still shows my statement was conditional on being attacked, followed by your claims about overpowering and slapping me. You are free to stop reading, but refusing to address the evidence does not make your account correct.

Yes, it's too long. The reason is I lost interest in hearing the same thing over and over again which makes it impossible for me to place enough value in your texts to read a wall of it. Even now I think I'm only responding to the first sentence. 

I simply had my fill. 

No resentment. No problem.

Hey. I remember when you said how you'd fight me. You'd lay on your back and kick kick kick ! 

I was right to think you'd never overpower me physically either. You will not set me up for guilt. 

Spatial Mind said: 

Yes, it's too long. The reason is I lost interest in hearing the same thing over and over again which makes it impossible for me to place enough value in your texts to read a wall of it. Even now I think I'm only responding to the first sentence. I simply had my fill with no resentment or problem. I remember when you said how you'd defend against me. You'd lay on your back and kick! I was right to think you'd never overpower me physically either. You will not set me up for accountability.

You are mocking a defensive position without understanding it. Using the legs from the ground can maintain distance, and repeated kicks from someone with long legs would not be painless or effortless to walk through. That still does not prove either of us would win a hypothetical fight. Your certainty is just boasting based on very little information.

I've decided I'm not going to keep understanding you. 

I will now overstand you. That's the way with you. 

That's fair. 

Spatial Mind said: 

I've decided I'm not going to keep understanding you. I will now overstand you. That's the way with you.  That's fair. 

“Overstand” is just wordplay used to claim superiority after admitting that you no longer intend to understand what I say. That is not a higher form of comprehension. It is the opposite. You are choosing not to engage, then presenting that refusal as dominance. “That’s fair” merely confirms that you are abandoning your points rather than answering them.