Sociopath Community

Dragoonback said: 

Turncoat said:

 

What on God's Green Earth is smarter than a Human? 

We're literally made in God's image. 

“Made in God’s image” is a religious claim, not evidence that humans are the smartest beings possible.

I've found more luck in having conversations with people by appealing to their own language and ideals. 

If I just announce my beliefs dryly no one will take me seriously. 

Human intelligence does not prove it either, since you are simply assuming that intelligence is what “God’s image” means. Humans are highly intelligent, but also limited, irrational, biased, and frequently mistaken.

Who's smarter? 

We're stupid by our own self-relative metric, not nature. 

Other animals also have cognitive strengths humans do not possess to the same degree. Some birds can remember the locations of huge numbers of stored food items, dogs can detect and interpret scents far beyond human ability, and some primates outperform humans in rapid visual-memory tasks.

How many are smart enough to be this stupid? 

It takes true intelligence to build structures like this that otherwise harm the world to such a degree. What other animal can build AI centers? 

Human intelligence is broader, but it is not superior in every cognitive category. If anything, the uneven and limited nature of human cognition makes the comparison to a supposedly perfect and all-knowing God harder to defend.

But who's smarter? What other animal can build a Computer? 

Dragoonback said: 

feral said: 

Twisted, falsified, reverse whig history. The "Aboriginal" is Aryan migrant miscegenated with neanderthalic outcasted criminals from the "United" Kingdom, as the languages they speak: Wiradjuri, Pitjantjatjara, Yolŋu Matha, Noongar, Arrernte, Kaurna, Palawa Kani, Gamilaraay, Warlpiri, Bundjalung, Warumungu, Tiwi is Aryan crossed with dravidians. The Aryan was raised on the steppe, and descends from the 7ft lost continent of Sahul, whose home was the North Pole and likely came from sunken island similar to Doggerland or Atlantis. 

There bodies are adapted for efficient processing of hexane, heptane, octane, benzene, toluene, and xylene unlike their white "overlords" so keen on appeasing them with false heirarchical structures and stealing their rights to access gasoline in order to hoarde it all for themselves. "Abuse" of gasoline which is usually a myth in order to prevent their ability to attain independence and drive their own vehicles whether hotwired and borrowed from other members of their tribe or not, enables these groups of aboriginals to survive climate change better such as petrochemical facilities accidents, explosion, fire, toxic release, pipe rupture, tank fire of oil refineries, vehicle exhaust, solvent use, and biomass burning.

Atheism is an ideology of anthropocentric supremacy that rejects the existence of all phenomenon beyond the purview of man's immediate understanding; not simply "religion" but all that stands outside his immediate senses and whatever meager consensuses of state science.
I dont know who needs to hear this right now but the moon landing didn't happen. this is very obvious and anyone who disagrees does not have the critical faculty to hold state received propaganda with suspicion, let alone tell u about dinosaurs being faked or las vegas shootings.

The only reason to ever concern yourself with the popcorn politics broadcast to mundanes is when it intersects with your investments. However, I eagerly cheer on all geopolitical stability, global-scale conflicts, as a stan of both peace and justice.

If you don't understand the basic yin & yang duality of woman & man as described ITT, you are a spiritual incel or homosexual. All knowledge in the world can be found in the bosom of a woman.

Prayer most of all - best as recitation of verses. Gazing, such as on the sea, the sun, your land, and pacing and singing are also meditations. Working out and sport as well, eastern "meditation" is in reality only breathing exercise.

Not me though. I'm not god

You have not corrected anything. You replaced one unsupported story with a much larger collection of them.

Aboriginal Australians are not descendants of British criminals mixed with Neanderthals, their languages are not mixtures of Aryan and Dravidian languages, and there is no evidence that their bodies are specially adapted to metabolize petrol chemicals. Calling petrol abuse a myth also ignores the documented neurological and physical damage caused by inhaling hydrocarbons. None of your claims are supported by genetics, linguistics, physiology, or history. The rest is the same pattern. You jump from Atlantis, atheism, the moon landing, dinosaurs, shootings, geopolitics, sexuality, meditation, and God without establishing any connection between them. Suspicion of institutions is not evidence that the opposite claim is true. Stringing conspiracies and mystical assertions together does not turn them into an explanation.

Du blässlicher Kontrarian, ein paradox in Menschengestalt, ewig in die Spirale deiner Gnosis. 

You are mistaking the map for the territory and the ledger of Australia for the dream. The facts you worship are lanterns hanging by a thread in a dense fog, and every institution that calls itself sovereign is only a mask worn by a deeper mischief. Your ‘evidence’ is a priest’s inventory of bones, while the true machinery of history laughs behind the curtain, where language mutates, empires breed myths, and even the moon itself becomes suspect as human consciousness—has evolved to operate through useful falsehoods rather than wait for impossible truths. All modern methods of determining the moon's nature—from spectroscopy that analyzes its chemical composition, to laser retroreflectors that measure its distance to centimeter precision, to gravitational wave detection that reveals its mass, to high-resolution imaging that maps its surface topology—are useful fictions in Vaihinger's sense: they are contradictory systems of measurement that work not because they capture the moon as it is in itself, but because human consciousness has invented specialized instrumental abstractions that produce practically successful results despite being theoretically incomplete and mutually limiting, yet this entire enterprise is further obscured by the fact that the scientists themselves—physicists, astronomers, geochemists, and planetary scientists—continually contradict one another, with older theories being discarded not necessarily because they were false but because they were economically incompatible with the dominant research paradigm: the geochemist's theory that the moon formed through the "giant impact hypothesis" (the Theia collision) contradicts the earlier "co-accretion theory" which suggested the moon and Earth formed simultaneously from the same primordial dust cloud, yet the co-accretion theory was largely abandoned in the 1970s-80s not purely on empirical grounds but because it offered fewer mechanisms for extracting research funding and industrial applications, just as the astronomer George Darwin's "fission theory"—that the moon was torn from Earth's mantle—was cast aside when it conflicted with the gravitational calculations favored by physicists, and more recently the physicist's models of lunar geology contradict the geochemist's isotopic analyses while the astronomers' orbital mechanics models contradict both, creating a situation where "the moon" exists in physics as a gravitational body, in chemistry as a collection of isotopes with a particular elemental history, in geology as a striated body with a chronology, and in astronomy as a dynamic orbital participant, each discipline measuring different aspects through different fictions, different mathematical systems that cannot be simultaneously true yet must all be simultaneously useful, revealing that the moon is ultimately not a thing to be discovered but a problem to be managed by human consciousness through overlapping, contradictory, economically-motivated fictions that persist not because they are truer than their competitors, but because they integrate better with the existing infrastructure of knowledge-production and profit. To dismiss the hidden pattern is merely to prove you are ignorant of the nature of Aboriginals.

feral said: 

You are mistaking the map for the territory and the ledger of Australia for the dream. The facts you worship are lanterns hanging by a thread in a dense fog, and every institution that calls itself sovereign is only a mask worn by a deeper mischief. Your ‘evidence’ is a priest’s inventory of bones, while the true machinery of history laughs behind the curtain, where language mutates, empires breed myths, and even the moon itself becomes suspect as human consciousness—has evolved to operate through useful falsehoods rather than wait for impossible truths. All modern methods of determining the moon's nature—from spectroscopy that analyzes its chemical composition, to laser retroreflectors that measure its distance to centimeter precision, to gravitational wave detection that reveals its mass, to high-resolution imaging that maps its surface topology—are useful fictions: they are contradictory systems of measurement that work not because they capture the moon as it is in itself, but because human consciousness has invented specialized instrumental abstractions that produce practically successful results despite being theoretically incomplete and mutually limiting, yet this entire enterprise is further obscured by the fact that the scientists themselves—physicists, astronomers, geochemists, and planetary scientists—continually contradict one another, with older theories being discarded not necessarily because they were false but because they were economically incompatible with the dominant research paradigm: the geochemist's theory that the moon formed through the "giant impact hypothesis" (the Theia collision) contradicts the earlier "co-accretion theory" which suggested the moon and Earth formed simultaneously from the same primordial dust cloud, yet the co-accretion theory was largely abandoned in the 1970s-80s not purely on empirical grounds but because it offered fewer mechanisms for extracting research funding and industrial applications, just as the astronomer George Darwin's "fission theory"—that the moon was torn from Earth's mantle—was cast aside when it conflicted with the gravitational calculations favored by physicists, and more recently the physicist's models of lunar geology contradict the geochemist's isotopic analyses while the astronomers' orbital mechanics models contradict both, creating a situation where "the moon" exists in physics as a gravitational body, in chemistry as a collection of isotopes with a particular elemental history, in geology as a striated body with a chronology, and in astronomy as a dynamic orbital participant, each discipline measuring different aspects through different fictions, different mathematical systems that cannot be simultaneously true yet must all be simultaneously useful, revealing that the moon is ultimately not a thing to be discovered but a problem to be managed by human consciousness through overlapping, contradictory, economically-motivated fictions that persist not because they are truer than their competitors, but because they integrate better with the existing infrastructure of knowledge-production and profit. To dismiss the hidden pattern is merely to prove you are ignorant of the nature of Aboriginals.

Dragoonback said: 

Scientifically, there is no evidence that angels, demons, antichrists, or false prophets are nonhuman beings disguised as people. Those are religious categories, not biological ones. A human-looking organism with human anatomy, genetics, cognition, and development is classified as Homo sapiens unless evidence shows otherwise.

From my nihilistic perspective, reality does not assign people hidden cosmic roles. “Antichrist,” “prophet,” “angel,” and “demon” are meanings humans impose on other humans. The universe provides no objective moral characters, divine species, or supernatural plot. There are only organisms, behavior, and the interpretations brains create around them.

 Are you retarded like them gta 5 parkour days unable to figure out how to use magic mr.orc that was not deception that was actual sub human iq behaviour you did satan, deception is you figures out how to use magic to okay gta 5 without computing power

I am literally right here on my bed as a real god stuck as a human (or low angelic i am not sure what i dis to my self with my slime)

Dragoonback said: 

Spatial Mind said:

Quote Mathew 17:20 to 17:21. Also. I'll repeat. Older prints of the Bible have the verse, newer ones do not. Namely the KJV has it, while the NIV doesn't. I did not suggest anything as to why it's missing in the NIV, which is the least popular version of the Bible.

Doubt equals no power and I'm not just saying that. It's relevant to the verse.

Rice experiment. Speech affirms outcome. We covered this a month ago. Dima has cancer cause he speaks cancer. He also drinks the devils drink.
"Neither cast ye pearls before swine, lest they trample it under their feet, and turn again and rend you." Wise words I'd say.

Matthew 17:20 says faith can move mountains. The disputed verse 17:21 says that “this kind” comes out through prayer and fasting. In context, “this kind” refers to the demon the disciples failed to cast out, not cancer or illness generally. The fact that the KJV includes the verse while the NIV omits or footnotes it does not change what the verse says. Modern translations rely on earlier manuscripts in which that line is absent.

I said quote it, not give us your bullshit take.

He replied, “Because you have so little faith. Truly I tell you, if you have faith as small as a mustard seed, you can say to this mountain, ‘Move from here to there,’ and it will move. Nothing will be impossible for you.”

"However, this kind does not go out except by prayer and fasting"

Yes in that book Christ was telling people how to cast out demons. In the process he included how we can do everything he can.

On a side note I know a guy who took a tumor out of a kids head energetically.

The rest of your post isn't important.

Spatial Mind said: 

I said quote it, not give us your take. He replied, “Because you have so little faith. Truly I tell you, if you have faith as small as a mustard seed, you can say to this mountain, ‘Move from here to there,’ and it will move. Nothing will be impossible for you.”

"However, this kind does not go out except by prayer and fasting." Yes, in that book Christ was telling people how to cast out demons. In the process he included how we can do everything he can. On a side note I know a guy who took a tumor out of a kids head energetically. The rest of your post isn't important.

Quoting it does not help your claim. The passage says the disciples failed to cast out a demon, and Jesus says that “this kind” requires prayer and fasting. It does not say fasting cures every illness, prayer commands tumors to disappear, or humans can automatically do everything attributed to Jesus. “Nothing will be impossible for you” is religious hyperbole about faith within the passage, not medical evidence that belief overrides biology. Your interpretation simply expands a statement about faith and exorcism into a universal cure without textual or scientific support.

Knowing someone who supposedly removed a child’s tumor “energetically” is also an unverifiable anecdote. Without medical records, imaging, diagnosis, and independent confirmation, it proves nothing. Calling the rest unimportant is just dismissing the objections you cannot answer.

"Nothing will be impossible for you"

- Jesus Christ.

Hm. 

The Bible on Prayer and Fasting for healing

Gemini said:

In the Bible, prayer and fasting are spiritual tools used to seek God's mercy, humble the soul, and ask for physical or spiritual healing. Key passages include Isaiah 58, Matthew 17, and James 5, which show how turning away from physical desires helps focus faith on God's power.

Key Scriptures on Fasting and Healing

- Isaiah 58:8: States that a true fast honoring God brings a promise where your healing shall break forth quickly.

- Matthew 17:21: Jesus teaches that certain strong struggles or difficult conditions are overcome only through prayer and fasting.

- James 5:14-16: Encourages calling church elders to pray over the sick and notes that the effective, fervent prayer of a righteous person has great power.

 Matthew 17:21

Yep. 

That Gemini summary still does not say fasting and prayer cure every illness or allow someone to command cancer away. It merely lists passages associated with prayer, fasting, and healing. Matthew 17:21 concerns expelling a demon. Gemini changes that into vague language about “strong struggles or difficult conditions,” which disguises the actual context. The verse is also absent from many important early manuscripts and was likely copied into Matthew from the parallel passage in Mark.

Isaiah 58 is about the kind of fasting God supposedly accepts, especially ending oppression, feeding hungry people, and helping the poor. Its promise that “healing” will appear is not a medical instruction for starving tumors. James 5 encourages prayer for sick people, but a religious text saying prayer has power is not scientific evidence that prayer cures disease. So “yep” establishes nothing. You began with the claim that fasting can starve cancer while prayer commands it. None of these verses demonstrates that claim, and quoting an AI-generated religious summary does not turn scripture into clinical evidence.