Sociopath Community

Dragoonback said: 

Turncoat said:

 

What on God's Green Earth is smarter than a Human? 

We're literally made in God's image. 

“Made in God’s image” is a religious claim, not evidence that humans are the smartest beings possible.

I've found more luck in having conversations with people by appealing to their own language and ideals. 

If I just announce my beliefs dryly no one will take me seriously. 

Human intelligence does not prove it either, since you are simply assuming that intelligence is what “God’s image” means. Humans are highly intelligent, but also limited, irrational, biased, and frequently mistaken.

Who's smarter? 

We're stupid by our own self-relative metric, not nature. 

Other animals also have cognitive strengths humans do not possess to the same degree. Some birds can remember the locations of huge numbers of stored food items, dogs can detect and interpret scents far beyond human ability, and some primates outperform humans in rapid visual-memory tasks.

How many are smart enough to be this stupid? 

It takes true intelligence to build structures like this that otherwise harm the world to such a degree. What other animal can build AI centers? 

Human intelligence is broader, but it is not superior in every cognitive category. If anything, the uneven and limited nature of human cognition makes the comparison to a supposedly perfect and all-knowing God harder to defend.

But who's smarter? What other animal can build a Computer? 

Dragoonback said: 

feral said: 

Twisted, falsified, reverse whig history. The "Aboriginal" is Aryan migrant miscegenated with neanderthalic outcasted criminals from the "United" Kingdom, as the languages they speak: Wiradjuri, Pitjantjatjara, Yolŋu Matha, Noongar, Arrernte, Kaurna, Palawa Kani, Gamilaraay, Warlpiri, Bundjalung, Warumungu, Tiwi is Aryan crossed with dravidians. The Aryan was raised on the steppe, and descends from the 7ft lost continent of Sahul, whose home was the North Pole and likely came from sunken island similar to Doggerland or Atlantis. 

There bodies are adapted for efficient processing of hexane, heptane, octane, benzene, toluene, and xylene unlike their white "overlords" so keen on appeasing them with false heirarchical structures and stealing their rights to access gasoline in order to hoarde it all for themselves. "Abuse" of gasoline which is usually a myth in order to prevent their ability to attain independence and drive their own vehicles whether hotwired and borrowed from other members of their tribe or not, enables these groups of aboriginals to survive climate change better such as petrochemical facilities accidents, explosion, fire, toxic release, pipe rupture, tank fire of oil refineries, vehicle exhaust, solvent use, and biomass burning.

Atheism is an ideology of anthropocentric supremacy that rejects the existence of all phenomenon beyond the purview of man's immediate understanding; not simply "religion" but all that stands outside his immediate senses and whatever meager consensuses of state science.
I dont know who needs to hear this right now but the moon landing didn't happen. this is very obvious and anyone who disagrees does not have the critical faculty to hold state received propaganda with suspicion, let alone tell u about dinosaurs being faked or las vegas shootings.

The only reason to ever concern yourself with the popcorn politics broadcast to mundanes is when it intersects with your investments. However, I eagerly cheer on all geopolitical stability, global-scale conflicts, as a stan of both peace and justice.

If you don't understand the basic yin & yang duality of woman & man as described ITT, you are a spiritual incel or homosexual. All knowledge in the world can be found in the bosom of a woman.

Prayer most of all - best as recitation of verses. Gazing, such as on the sea, the sun, your land, and pacing and singing are also meditations. Working out and sport as well, eastern "meditation" is in reality only breathing exercise.

Not me though. I'm not god

You have not corrected anything. You replaced one unsupported story with a much larger collection of them.

Aboriginal Australians are not descendants of British criminals mixed with Neanderthals, their languages are not mixtures of Aryan and Dravidian languages, and there is no evidence that their bodies are specially adapted to metabolize petrol chemicals. Calling petrol abuse a myth also ignores the documented neurological and physical damage caused by inhaling hydrocarbons. None of your claims are supported by genetics, linguistics, physiology, or history. The rest is the same pattern. You jump from Atlantis, atheism, the moon landing, dinosaurs, shootings, geopolitics, sexuality, meditation, and God without establishing any connection between them. Suspicion of institutions is not evidence that the opposite claim is true. Stringing conspiracies and mystical assertions together does not turn them into an explanation.

Du blässlicher Kontrarian, ein paradox in Menschengestalt, ewig in die Spirale deiner Gnosis. 

You are mistaking the map for the territory and the ledger of Australia for the dream. The facts you worship are lanterns hanging by a thread in a dense fog, and every institution that calls itself sovereign is only a mask worn by a deeper mischief. Your ‘evidence’ is a priest’s inventory of bones, while the true machinery of history laughs behind the curtain, where language mutates, empires breed myths, and even the moon itself becomes suspect as human consciousness—has evolved to operate through useful falsehoods rather than wait for impossible truths. All modern methods of determining the moon's nature—from spectroscopy that analyzes its chemical composition, to laser retroreflectors that measure its distance to centimeter precision, to gravitational wave detection that reveals its mass, to high-resolution imaging that maps its surface topology—are useful fictions in Vaihinger's sense: they are contradictory systems of measurement that work not because they capture the moon as it is in itself, but because human consciousness has invented specialized instrumental abstractions that produce practically successful results despite being theoretically incomplete and mutually limiting, yet this entire enterprise is further obscured by the fact that the scientists themselves—physicists, astronomers, geochemists, and planetary scientists—continually contradict one another, with older theories being discarded not necessarily because they were false but because they were economically incompatible with the dominant research paradigm: the geochemist's theory that the moon formed through the "giant impact hypothesis" (the Theia collision) contradicts the earlier "co-accretion theory" which suggested the moon and Earth formed simultaneously from the same primordial dust cloud, yet the co-accretion theory was largely abandoned in the 1970s-80s not purely on empirical grounds but because it offered fewer mechanisms for extracting research funding and industrial applications, just as the astronomer George Darwin's "fission theory"—that the moon was torn from Earth's mantle—was cast aside when it conflicted with the gravitational calculations favored by physicists, and more recently the physicist's models of lunar geology contradict the geochemist's isotopic analyses while the astronomers' orbital mechanics models contradict both, creating a situation where "the moon" exists in physics as a gravitational body, in chemistry as a collection of isotopes with a particular elemental history, in geology as a striated body with a chronology, and in astronomy as a dynamic orbital participant, each discipline measuring different aspects through different fictions, different mathematical systems that cannot be simultaneously true yet must all be simultaneously useful, revealing that the moon is ultimately not a thing to be discovered but a problem to be managed by human consciousness through overlapping, contradictory, economically-motivated fictions that persist not because they are truer than their competitors, but because they integrate better with the existing infrastructure of knowledge-production and profit. To dismiss the hidden pattern is merely to prove you are ignorant of the nature of Aboriginals.

feral said: 

You are mistaking the map for the territory and the ledger of Australia for the dream. The facts you worship are lanterns hanging by a thread in a dense fog, and every institution that calls itself sovereign is only a mask worn by a deeper mischief. Your ‘evidence’ is a priest’s inventory of bones, while the true machinery of history laughs behind the curtain, where language mutates, empires breed myths, and even the moon itself becomes suspect as human consciousness—has evolved to operate through useful falsehoods rather than wait for impossible truths. All modern methods of determining the moon's nature—from spectroscopy that analyzes its chemical composition, to laser retroreflectors that measure its distance to centimeter precision, to gravitational wave detection that reveals its mass, to high-resolution imaging that maps its surface topology—are useful fictions: they are contradictory systems of measurement that work not because they capture the moon as it is in itself, but because human consciousness has invented specialized instrumental abstractions that produce practically successful results despite being theoretically incomplete and mutually limiting, yet this entire enterprise is further obscured by the fact that the scientists themselves—physicists, astronomers, geochemists, and planetary scientists—continually contradict one another, with older theories being discarded not necessarily because they were false but because they were economically incompatible with the dominant research paradigm: the geochemist's theory that the moon formed through the "giant impact hypothesis" (the Theia collision) contradicts the earlier "co-accretion theory" which suggested the moon and Earth formed simultaneously from the same primordial dust cloud, yet the co-accretion theory was largely abandoned in the 1970s-80s not purely on empirical grounds but because it offered fewer mechanisms for extracting research funding and industrial applications, just as the astronomer George Darwin's "fission theory"—that the moon was torn from Earth's mantle—was cast aside when it conflicted with the gravitational calculations favored by physicists, and more recently the physicist's models of lunar geology contradict the geochemist's isotopic analyses while the astronomers' orbital mechanics models contradict both, creating a situation where "the moon" exists in physics as a gravitational body, in chemistry as a collection of isotopes with a particular elemental history, in geology as a striated body with a chronology, and in astronomy as a dynamic orbital participant, each discipline measuring different aspects through different fictions, different mathematical systems that cannot be simultaneously true yet must all be simultaneously useful, revealing that the moon is ultimately not a thing to be discovered but a problem to be managed by human consciousness through overlapping, contradictory, economically-motivated fictions that persist not because they are truer than their competitors, but because they integrate better with the existing infrastructure of knowledge-production and profit. To dismiss the hidden pattern is merely to prove you are ignorant of the nature of Aboriginals.