Sociopath Community

I have a theory that Euthanasia would cure BPD as the BPD thrives off of baiting suicide constantly but in a society wehre suicide is normalized, this would not even be possible.

LIKE a bpd wakes up, threatens to an-hero. Sometimes multiple times in the single course of a day. Obviously this is a concerning issue to bystanders. Suicide is seen as an act of treason, and conjures guilt and protective signals in those around them. Sometimes it seems as though the goal of the bpd is to push limits as much as possible. This is a beautiful thing. BPD's are gods most blessed and cursed creatures. However, if euthanasia was voluntary and accepted, what outlet would the bpd turn to for excess? Perhaps bpd is even caused by the state's control over the death = shame apparatus. Replace the phone booths and the outhouses with euthanasia booths on the street corners, they wouldnt even have to invent anti-homeless hostile architecture then. 

Lil_Zero-Sum said: 

Often, I have come to observe in my studies over the course of the years that euthanasia is taboo among the common populace. Perceptions of voluntary self-death seem to drift between shallowly considered propagated  beliefs tailored to suit the many delusions of the worshippers of the meat-grinder that is the cycle of life.

 
Among these reasons, we have: remaining alive for the sake of one’s family and friends, workplace drone peer pressure, religious threats, cultural disregard for individual suffering or self interest, having enough soldiers for wartime, yolo, conspiracy theorist propaganda about population control etc.

If voluntary euthanasia was commonplace and accepted, humans would not grieve so much over the loss of ones close to them, or even over strangers as the acceptance of the right to choose to pass away would not be seen as heresy to the selfish requirements of the living. In ancient societies suicide was commonly practiced as a method of redemption for one’s honor which stemmed into Christianity’s clever Machiavellian perversion of this into the inverse—being that it is instead iredeemable to take one’s life—as many earlier sects were dying out due to the rejection of the world and their realization of life entailing inevitable suffering—with suicide being the most logical solution. However the movement could not spread if the followers kept dying and so, suicide became an act against God.

As for war, is living for the sake of dying for the politics of billionaires really a—to phrase it as the gullible virtue ethicists would deem appropriate—noble and honorable cause?

And ludicrously enough, ideas of voluntary euthanasia being genocide to the Caucasian race, or Zionist memetic population control… The human race is a self fulfilling prophecy of Sado-masochistic addiction to recurrent deprivation and alleviation of such, even video games simulate this habitual training as “fun” because it is so thoughtless and surrogately removed from actual deprivation in life itself, acting as exposure therapy for some and dissociation from the reality of life for others, all sharing the same localized personal hardships, each relevant to oneself and blind to the hardships of another but for selfishly rooted personal motives of self-righteous sympathies, just to get through the act of maintaining one’s life. The terminally ill patient accepts and adapts to his pain just as the hardworking athlete who comes in last place at the sports ball tournament adapts to his trauma. The relative suffering of one may measure another where it seems the other should be on the greener side of things because the survival of life depends on competitionThere is no real race when one has become as ash or a pile of bones—in life it is much the same, man goes about his way unconscious to the many taxing agonies within himself, let alone others—gleefully smug to eat hamburgers while another man slowly starves to death or is beaten in an alley, another is dying from cancer with no reasonable accommodations, Ebola takes out an entire villiage, but at least the new episode in the series on the television is satiating enough for adequate distraction from his minor case of athletes foot.

Another counter argument against the right to suicide is that if it were made acceptable, everyone would do it, except for the Jews because they are the ones behind the agenda, so that they may have their "happy” frontiers amongst themselves. Does this theory not give even more credence to Zionist thought that goyim are incapable of agency and self determination?

What are your thoughts on the matter?

 Gardening machines

exist

you first :)

It's possible that eximplifying voluntary illegal euthanasia would fix policies on the right to non-existence. However even more effective would be to continue encouraging an open format in the dialectic. With that being said, methinks that anti-natalism discourse still requires much to discuss that is impossible to eximplify as I have already been born hence I am forced to continue discussing the notion that nothingness cannot be consented to be taken away from a fictitious entity forced into existence and simultaneously can existence not be consented to and that existence is a harm and discussing things like voluntary euthanasia can reduce this harm.

I volunteer to be killed as tribute is it an onion site?

Lil_Zero-Sum said: 

It's possible that exemplifying voluntary illegal euthanasia would fix policies on the right to non-existence. However even more effective would be to continue encouraging an open format in the dialectic. With that being said, methinks that anti-natalism discourse still requires much to discuss that is impossible to exemplify as I have already been born hence I am forced to continue discussing the notion that nothingness cannot be consented to be taken away from a fictitious entity forced into existence and simultaneously can existence not be consented to and that existence is a harm and discussing things like voluntary euthanasia can reduce this harm.

The difference is that euthanasia is more likely to further encourage societal tools that involve a lack of consent similar to being born. Noticing how even Spatial Mind supports euthanasia (yet he is anti-abortion) should tell you this and what his intentions/motivations are. He is all about systems that lack consent and even mentioned before how he looked down on people who hanged themselves yet is pro-euthanasia through medical means only, basically as long as he feels in control of other people it's fine.

I feel like offering everyone the choice will fix our population problem. 

Turncoat said: 

I feel like offering everyone the choice will fix our population problem. 

 We do not have a population problem. 

Lil_Zero-Sum said: 

Another counter argument against the right to suicide is that if it were made acceptable, everyone would do it, except for the Jews because they are the ones behind the agenda, so that they may have their "happy” frontiers amongst themselves. Does this theory not give even more credence to Zionist thought that goyim are incapable of agency and self determination?

What are your thoughts on the matter?

 Been hearing a lot of bad about the Jews. They seem to create their own misery. Not all Jews of course. Hey all Jewish people, get your shit together and take care of this perception problem you have. Find these bad Jewish actors and correct this issue. I think this all stems from them thinking they are the "chosen people". People just don't like that kind of arrogance.

Did the Jews kill Charlie Kirk?

Dragoonback said: 

Turncoat said: 

I feel like offering everyone the choice will fix our population problem. 

 We do not have a population problem. 

Tell that to The Rainforest. 

Dragoonback said: 

Lil_Zero-Sum said: 

It's possible that exemplifying voluntary illegal euthanasia would fix policies on the right to non-existence. However even more effective would be to continue encouraging an open format in the dialectic. With that being said, methinks that anti-natalism discourse still requires much to discuss that is impossible to exemplify as I have already been born hence I am forced to continue discussing the notion that nothingness cannot be consented to be taken away from a fictitious entity forced into existence and simultaneously can existence not be consented to and that existence is a harm and discussing things like voluntary euthanasia can reduce this harm.

The difference is that euthanasia is more likely to further encourage societal tools that involve a lack of consent similar to being born. Noticing how even Spatial Mind supports euthanasia (yet he is anti-abortion) should tell you this and what his intentions/motivations are. He is all about systems that lack consent and even mentioned before how he looked down on people who hanged themselves yet is pro-euthanasia through medical means only, basically as long as he feels in control of other people it's fine.

 Well, you support abortion yet support the industry in which baby animals are slaughtered. Also if your issue is primarily coming from consent, not reduction of suffering itself, the fetus, like the baby animal in the crowded factory farm huddling amongst the warmest corpse it can find amidst the other corpses in some cases as it slowly succumbs to a meaningless death as the consumer is advertised visions of a farm from paradise and cheap slogans to separate the consumer from the source of the pain which would be intolerable and unmarketable, has no voice to say once it has begun to develop whether or not it wants to be killed and have its stem cells sold to pharmeceutical companies anyway. Rape is obviously a grey area here, as a fully formed adult human has the capacity to suffer more than a fetus in any stage; the resolution may be that the mother will choose abortion. However, the best way to prevent the harm of existence is to not feed the gateway womb to the meatgrinder torture of sentience in the first place.