Of course. Blame others while you never do what needs to be done.
Poverty existed before the financial system. For example if a man never hunted or farmed, or was unable to build a shelter and weapons to defend his pack from predators. It's weakness. The weak wouldn't survive.
Today the weak still exists, and they aren't really so useful.
Of course there are other things that can make one poor, like idle hands, but If you're an obnoxious dick it'll be like a calculated mental illness keeping you poor.
Your life could be better if only you'd listen to me.
I am not going to listen to your romanticism disguised that malforms the recognition of determinism into something (stoicism) that suits your imperialistic narrative. The rich literally use the system to enrich themselves further as you deny the existence of said system in favor of a make believe free market that has never really existed and would at best be irrelevant if it did exist at any point, along with being fundamentally different to capitalism that you deceptively equate. You falsely equate wealth with capitalism and communism with poverty vows or some other reactionary notion on these things because your bias is with imperialism. You will be arguing false points forever and continuing to go on narcissistic Dr.Phil style lectures.
And yes, Capitalist charity is part of Capitalist narcissism where human needs are denied so Capitalists can play savior and control other humans while acting "disappointed" that others can't just accept their control.
It's been decided that all creatures must work for a living, or we'll perish.
In the stone ages it was much harder than it is now, where the weak had to pull their own weight in ways that would serve someone more powerful than they were. If not, then the struggle for survival would've been too much while the odds of falling prey to predators increased.
This is why women today are hypergamous in nature. Her survival was dependent on finding a man with balls of steel capable of bringing home the kill. If such a man couldn't supply her with that she'll need to move onto finding someone better.
Today's left wing culture believe stone age women were like wildcats, able to team up and tackle a rhino and look fabulous doing it.
The right wing would suggest the stone age woman were nurturers, and booty prone to being stolen by some alpha male.
In the stone age being weak was poverty. Lacking the skill to make tools and weapons. Unable to hunt or defend yielded 0 rewards which are basically the same things today. Food, shelter, land and tools. Everything else is novelty or found useful.
Every man in the stone age has been weak in a dangerous world from their childhood and were fortunate enough to have Father's who were strong, teaching their sons knowledge and his ways. The Father himself may have taken the Mother/Booty from a weaker man, still happens today.
Today the weak man is still being protected, unlike before, in a land conquered by our species. The weak, are the disabled and the unabled being granted a monthly allowance by laws written and enforced by those in power, and sometimes, the weak despises those in power.
The weak who despise those in power ? Oh yes look at them, contributing nothing but protest and hatred to the genepool, while the system they hate so much, has them better off than our ancestors in the stone age. Way better off.
The weak man wants it all destroyed, and also his race to be obliterated and why ? Weakness.
Weakness isn't really a funny thing, but sometimes the right winged will be amused by it. A right winged reporter gets epic footage of people having meltdowns with no good reasoning other than, "hate that is all".
.
.
.
In the event or a civil war, it's going to be a war of intelligence. We always see someone swing to the right, but not the left. Even government officials. Republicans. Trump, Elon, RFK, Regan, Gabbard. All used to be left wing, they swing to the right because of their values.
The truth is hardcoded. 1+1 = 2. No negotiations, and any other won't function. What works is true and It's tradition at this point.
Conservatism does not at all lead to functionality, it leads to destructive racism and more inbreeding.
Basically, the exact opposite of everything you say is the truth.
Dragoonback is obviously pushing propaganda for the CCP.
I don't need to push propaganda for the ccp when the west is so clearly prolapsed.
Maninist said:What works is true and It's tradition at this point.
Tradition is not the same as truth at all. Tradition is reactionary and tends to hold the truth in contempt as truth tends to violate traditions.
I'm speaking for those who base their traditions on what functions. It's been done for a long time.
A radical leftie would easily lay claim to falsehoods and probably try to make traditional spin offs off of their fabrications, which usually promote dysfunctional practices.
.
.
.
Not that it makes me happy, but there'll come a time when Islam will out populate everyone, because in practice they expand themselves, while here in the west having offspring has become unpopular, uncool and unaffordable, though the local muslims are pulling it off regardless of the financial climate. The Muslims are also hard on gender roles, where the men don't allow women to lead. So the men will have multiple wives and multiple children, while the west is grooming children to be queer.
The last non muslims will be weak and snow flakey and will be wiped out by a majority muslim population and an islamic flag will be planted on the white house and every government on the globe will also bare that flag. There will be no place for the queer, western values will be gone and women around the world will be oppressed. Also, no more peperoni.
That kind of climate is antichrist, where resistance will not be unpunished with something even more horrible on the way. His return.
Sorry I had to preach and while people don't believe some of this, they can see some of it happening.
Of course. Blame others while you never do what needs to be done.
Poverty existed before the financial system. For example if a man never hunted or farmed, or was unable to build a shelter and weapons to defend his pack from predators. It's weakness. The weak wouldn't survive.
Today the weak still exists, and they aren't really so useful.
Of course there are other things that can make one poor, like idle hands, but If you're an obnoxious dick it'll be like a calculated mental illness keeping you poor.
Your life could be better if only you'd listen to me.
with individuals everything is clear. you are poor because you are weak. ok. but what about shit countries, as trump said about these countries? there are many countries, being born in which you will feel like you live in the ass. rich countries suck out useful resources and people, as cheap labor. and these countries will always be poor, because it is necessary for the flourishing of the central countries.
